Hi, need to submit a 1250 words paper on the topic Law of Evidence: The Right to Silence. The House of Lords in R v Webber of 2004 that pursuant to Section 34 facts may include any fact that is an issue at the trial and tendered by the defendant in his or her defence. Moreover, facts will include any explanation or fact that the defendant would have logically raised at an earlier stage of the criminal proceedings. According to the ruling in R v Ali, the only recourse a defendant may have is to either deny culpability at the police station or to prepare a statement setting out his or her defence so as to preserve the right to raise the defence at trial. The right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 of the ECHR demands, however, that prosecutors bear the burden of proof. It was ruled in R v Condron that directions to the jury must be given with caution emphasizing the right to silence. The Judicial Studies Board established 6 points intended to ensure that adverse inferences contained in section 34 do not contradict Article 6. The 6 points correspond with the 6 requirements for adverse inferences as laid doing in R v Argent and are: There must be proceedings. Failure to mention a fact must predate the charge or when being charged. The omission must have occurred while being questioned under caution. The questions must have related to determining who committed the offence. The omitted fact must be one subsequently used in defence at the trial. The omitted fact must be one that accused was logically expected to mention. The courts have tried to set limits to what amounts like a new fact and to preserve the defendant’s right to remain silent. For example in R v McGarry, the defendant was charged with causing grievous bodily harm. In a written statement taken by the police, the defendant claimed that he acted in self-defence and did not answer police questions. At his trial, the defendant testified to facts substantiating and building on his claim of self-defence. The trial judge said that he was not inviting the jury to draw an adverse inference since D had not raised a new fact but did state that it was up to the jury to determine whether or not they wished to draw an adverse inference.&nbsp.

 

I need help creating a thesis and an outline on Equine Assisted Psycotherapy: Horses Helping Humans Holistically with the Treatment of Addicitions. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. This study will further describe what really is equine-assisted psychotherapy (EAP) and discuss the processes and methodology conducted during the therapy. Furthermore, the researcher will also evaluate how well the program contributed to those who subscribe to the therapy and how can it be further improve to a more effective tool for therapists.

This essay declares that a lot of people nowadays experience different kind of mental depression or obsession that result to temporary halt on their everyday lives. However, scientific medicines cannot solely cure everything that a person is experiencing most especially when it is psychological illness. Thus, doctors such as therapy and counseling are conducting a lot of alternative procedures. This research aims to describe and further discuss the new emerging therapy that involves the use of horses. Hence, this research can be of help to the further understanding of EAP and giving the readers new option in terms of therapy treatment. This research intends to describe how EAP works and measure its effectivity in terms of the success of those who undergone the said therapy for the purpose of educating people on this new innovation in the field of medicine. In general, this research aims to describe Equine-assisted Psychotherapy and its contribution in the field of medicine. A considerable variety of possible mechanisms of action have been proposed.