Compose a 2750 words assignment on classification of one of the african language phyla. Needs to be plagiarism free! This research will begin with the statement that a Language signifies one’s identity. It gives a sense of unity and bonding to the speakers of one language. Not only is a language a tool for communicating one’s thoughts and ideas, it also enables the other to understand the same. Often, the national language of a region is the best portal of communication and unifying the masses. The importance of language is as good as undefined since nothing is possible without it. Hence the relentless research and developments being done on language and linguistics is appreciable and justified. Each language is different from another. therefore the study of languages is vast and virtually limitless. Language is based on signs and sounds, and it develops when people in a region associate certain sounds and signs to mean something unanimously understood. For personal ease, people may then create certain other symbolic activity relative to the earlier widely understood sign to mean something similar. This way, the parent language is altered and the variations in languages evolve. Even though the variations are adopted from parent language, these may differ to such an extent that they may not be recognizably related to the origin. Regarding language as only a way of communication will, in fact, disregard the numerous benefits and purposes achieved by this. Even though communication remains the core purpose of a language, it also enables one to feel belonged and related to a group or nation. It gives one a sense of unity and purpose.

Your assignment is to prepare and submit a paper on pro-social behavior see details. As a function of better understanding and defining prosocial behavior, this brief analysis will seek to lay out a series of definitions and motivators for the behavior as well as the single largest detractor to the behavior. Lastly, the analysis will seek to embrace the reader with the understand that although the definitions that have herein been relayed are useful in helping to understand the broad applications of such sociological and psychological actualities, the fact remains that in order to come to grips with the more dynamically complex eventualities of these forces, one must bear in mind that both the individual and the situation itself add a level of complexity and nuance that a simple definition cannot seek to convey. Naturally, prosocial behavior itself is not a guarantee within society. One of the reasons that prosocial behavior does not take place to a greater extent than it does already is due to something known as diffusion of responsibility. This unique psychological and sociological construct is built upon the ultimate premise that individuals will oftentimes seek to minimize their exposure to a given situation by pawning responsibility for a given set of events or circumstances onto someone else, refuse action as a function of stature within the given situation, or feel that action is needless due to the fact that any number of other individuals faced with the same set of circumstances could also do the same thing. Ultimately, these different conditions for diffusion of responsibility can all be traced back to the way in which an individual views his/her role within the group or the circumstances in question (Sturmer et al 2005). Although they may easily recognize the right decision and that it should be made, the fact remains that based upon these aforementioned conditions, individuals may oftentimes be hesitant to act in the way that they otherwise would given a different dynamic in either of these conditions. Examples of this type of impediment to prosocial behavior have been detailed within the course readings and are exhibited in any number of daily interactions that the reader might have (Safrilsyah et al 2009). Ultimately, the key understanding the at best helps to define the way that diffusion of responsibility works is that of self interest. The concept of self interest therefore runs in an opposite direction to that of prosocial behavior and diffusion of responsibility can motivate the individual to behave in an even more self-interested way than they otherwise might in any given situation. With regards to the steps for pro-social behavior, this next section will seek to lay out each of these steps and give a level of definition to them. Firstly, the individual most “notice” the need (Piff et al 2010). This of course is an obvious step but perhaps one that requires a perceptive nature on the part of the individual. The second step involves a proper cognition of the event as “correct interpretation” follows. As a function of noticing and correctly interpreting a given situation or event, the individual must then “assume responsibility”. It is at this juncture that prosocial behavior most often breaks down (Latane et al 1968).