submit a 1500 words paper on the topic Korean History. In Korean history, this period is also known as the “Time of Japanese Forced Occupation.” Let us discuss the various economic changes that Korea underwent when ruled by Japan.

/in /by

Hi, need to submit a 1500 words paper on the topic Korean History. In Korean history, this period is also known as the “Time of Japanese Forced Occupation.” Let us discuss the various economic changes that Korea underwent when ruled by Japan.

Colonialism is defined as the process of exploitation of a weaker country by a stronger country. In other words, it is a process by which stronger nations take control over weaker nations by establishing their power and exploiting the resources of the weaker nations in order to strengthen their economy.

Capitalism is a social system which exists in all the countries of the world. Capitalism involves distributing and producing goods that are owned by a small minority of people. Under capitalism, the private owners who are rich in economic status flourish more and more by utilizing the manpower of the poor workers working under them.

The term colony comes from the Latin word colon us, which means farmer. This term reminds the practice of colonialism that involved the transfer of population to a new geographic area where the newcomers lived as the settlers with the permanent mind while solving the allegiance of the politics of their country. Colonialism is thus a practice or power which involves the control of one county by another country.

Colonialism here refers to the act of Japanese people settling in Korea. At the initial stages, many Japanese came to Korea to farm and to fish the beautiful waters. Later on, they started to fix the crop prices. The high crop prices and taxes forced the Korean residents, especially farmers to relocate to Manchuria, a place in Japan. Many Koreans were made to work as laborers in Japanese soil.

The big business enterprise and semi-governmental organizations in Japan began to establish a monopoly on the mining, industry, and commerce. The progress in energy, transportation and communication systems, agriculture, commercial distribution, and monetary control was the benefit of the Japanese.

research paper on skyfall: masculine ideologies. Needs to be 8 pages. Please no plagiarism. Keywords: Skyfall, Masculinity, Ideologies, James Bond Skyfall: Masculine Ideologies “Bond. James Bond”.

/in /by

Need an research paper on skyfall: masculine ideologies. Needs to be 8 pages. Please no plagiarism. Keywords: Skyfall, Masculinity, Ideologies, James Bond Skyfall: Masculine Ideologies “Bond. James Bond”. This is probably one of the most classic lines delivered in an action movie. What separates this movie from other action films is the classy male lead character of the film. James Bond is an evidence of the influence of traditional masculine ideology on film. Over the years, James Bond movies have been filmed and shown all over the world, and the same ideology has been portrayed. With the advent of globalization, social change in the ideology of masculinity also emerged. Masculinity in the modern era conveyed a man as peaceful and more expressive in contrast to the traditional ideology of being patriarchal. Skyfall is another James Bond movie, created in the period of globalization. Does it conform to the modern masculinity ideologies? Is there a shift in the ideologies as an adaptation of the trend towards globalization? This paper aims to determine the form of masculine ideology in the film Skyfall, as an influence of globalization on the character. Summary of the Film The action film SkyFall revolves around the male lead character James Bond, who works for the MI6, a British Intelligence Agency. As a spy, famously known as Agent 007, he was assigned different missions and given the privilege of the innovations in ammunitions. When one of his missions got compromised, he got into a chase and a colleague had the mistake of shooting him rather than the enemy. He fell from the train and plunged into the river, then washed off to a falls. Hearing the sound of the running water from Agent 007’s headset, the people at the MI6 headquarters, including his handler Agent M, all presumed that he was dead. For a period of time, he did not show up, even when an obituary was circulated. He remained underground, faking his death, because he held a grudge against M for giving the order to the other agent to take the shot whether or not it would hit the enemy or Agent 007 during the chase (Mendes, 2012). After some time, the MI6 headquarters was suddenly attacked mysteriously, and Agent M was assumed to be the target. The unknown villain was able to hack into the MI6’s security and even breached Agent M’s laptop. To make matters worse, the encrypted data in the stolen hard drive was decoded and the spies who were undercover in the different terrorist groups were slowly being revealed to the public, leading to their torture and death. The situation of the MI6 did not escape the media’s attention, and Agent M was in trouble. Agent 007 saw what was happening and decided to go back to MI6 (Mendes, 2012). When he returned for duty, Agent 007 was subjected for debriefing and physical tests. He was evaluated to be fit to report back to the field, and started his pursuit for the villain who infiltrated the MI6 and was also after M. He was sent to China where he met Silva, the man responsible for the chaos in MI6. He was a former agent of the MI6, and M was also his handler. Silva tried to brainwash Agent 007 to joining him take down the MI6, but Agent 007 refused and instead, he was able to catch Silva. But the capture was also part of Silva’s plan. Agent 007 later on was able to figure out that Silva wanted to kill M as a revenge for his past ordeals. Knowing the plan, Agent 007 tried to set a trap for Silva and brought M to his childhood home in Scotland.

Create a 12 pages page paper that discusses descartes existence.

/in /by

Create a 12 pages page paper that discusses descartes existence. One of the conversations he started is the nature of human existence, which he suggests originates from God. This, of course, suggests Descartes had some sense of proof that God existed. Both of these concepts can be found toward the end of his Meditation III, published in his book Discourse on Method in 1637. By following his thought process in which he proves that he exists, it is possible to understand fully what Descartes meant when he provided his three proofs that he exists as well as his proof that God exists.

Understanding that Descartes approached the world from an analytical, logically-based viewpoint is essential in understanding his thought process in proving his existence and origins. Instead of simply accepting the forms of reasoning he’d been taught, Descartes believed “that all natural science must be capable of being unified under mathematics, and that the world must be of such a nature as to admit of mathematical treatment” (Vincent 2003). However, instead of dividing thought from all other academic disciplines as his contemporaries had always done, Descartes worked to bring science and philosophy together with similar measures of ‘proofs’ and credibility. “Unsatisfied with scholastic philosophy and troubled by skepticism of the sort expounded by Montaigne, Descartes soon conceived a comprehensive plan for applying mathematical methods in order to achieve perfect certainty in human knowledge” (Kemerling 2002). In approaching philosophy in this way, it is evident that Descartes also attempted to deny the existence of God as a religious and largely human emotional crutch. “Therefore Descartes proposes a method of thought incorporating the rigor of mathematics but based on intuitive truths about what is real, basic knowledge which could not be wrong (like the axioms of geometry). &nbsp.He calls into question everything that he thinks he has learned through his senses but rests his whole system on the one truth that he cannot doubt, namely, the reality of his own mind and the radical difference between the mental and the physical aspects of the world” (Brians 1998).

write an article on Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & Others. It needs to be at least 2000 words.

/in /by

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & Others. It needs to be at least 2000 words. The actual case to be determined by the Supreme Court was not whether the plaintiffs should be paid the equal pay claims they were seeking from the Birmingham City Council. rather, it was purely a case of jurisdiction. In the case that was presented before the high court, former employees of Birmingham the City Council were demanding to be paid equal employment claims after realizing that some of their ex-colleagues had been compensated for the same by the council (Old Square Chambers, 2012). However, while the claims that the former employees were raising could be genuine and valid, the legal issue that arises in the case is that by the time they realized that their ex-colleagues had been compensated for the equal pay claims, it was already too late since 6 months had expired. The law pertaining to this situation provides that a claimant has 6 months to present their employment claims to the Employment Tribunal from the date of the wrongdoing by the employer, after which such claims would not be admissible to the Tribunal (Honeyball, 2012, p. 47). However, the same law provides that the claimants have up to 6 years to present any claim to the civil courts, from the date of a wrongful act. Therefore, finding that their claim could not be admitted by the Employment Tribunal, the claimants presented the case before a civil court. In return, the Birmingham City Council filed a response to the court seeking to have the case struck out of the civil court, on the basis that such a case was better dealt with by the Employment Tribunal, as opposed to the civil court (Old Square Chambers, 2012). The high court upheld that the case could be heard by the civil court since its circumstances did not qualify the exceptional circumstances against which a case could be struck out of the civil court and be referred to the Employment Tribunal. The defendant, in this case, the Birmingham City Council, filed an appeal regarding the high court decision, which was also rejected by the Court of Appeal, which held the same ruling that the Supreme Court had given. It is upon the rejection of the appeal by the Court of Appeal that Birmingham the City Council filed the case for determination by the Supreme Court, so that the Supreme Court could determine whether the case could be struck out of the civil court and referred back to the Employment Tribunal (Honeyball, 2012, p. 47). Facts of the Case The case Birmingham City Council v Abdulla & Others [2012] is a case falling under the employment law, specifically under the Equality Act 2010, which provides that both the male and female workers shall be compensated the same for the services they deliver to an employer, which requires similar efforts and for which similar qualifications are required (Barnard & Hepple, 2004, p. 22). According to this act, if a woman’s contract is based on no less favorable terms compared to those of men, and the woman does the same roles and she is in the same employment, terms of equality should be applied for both men and women (Hepple, 2011, p. 54). However previously, the employer, in this case, the Birmingham City Council, had not compensated both women and men equally for their contracts for which they delivered their services to the council.&nbsp.