Need help with my writing homework on The Strength and Weakness of Talk Radio as a Forum for Political Debate. Write a 1250 word paper answering; The UK has BBC Radio 4, BBC Radio Five Live, and talkSPORT which follow a talk radio format. BBC London uses the same format as well for quite a few of its programs. Independent Local Radio stations which came up after the removal of BBC’s monopoly in 1970 accept talk radio as the norm for the majority of their projects.

The radio itself has had ups and downs in terms of popularity with the public but in the present day and age, it is one of the fastest-growing forms of mass communication (Hendy, 2000). It is a source for understanding the popular culture of a region and a method to judge the penetration of certain ideas. For example, in the US there are more than 1,200 talk radio shows every day and the number of people reached by the shows goes into the tens of millions. Social scientists have gone as far as to say that it is as a medium more important than the internet since the use of the telephone it can allow for extremely cheap access to the opinions of others and the reception of many different ideas from a wide spectrum of society (Scannell, 1991).

Talk radio in particular is important as a medium for political debate since it allows people to get their say in. Of course, the words of an individual may not represent the consensus of a whole society but the debate caused by those words might be important for the whole world (Scannell, 1991). As opposed to simply watching a political debate on television where the opinions of a few experts are given, or even reading the newspaper where the opinions of only one person are received, talk radio allows anyone who has to drive to be a participant in a political dialog to be a contributor (Scannell, 1996).

In terms of the things which talk radio focuses on, it is a clear winner when compared to syndicated shows or the coverage of events on television. Issues that may be left alone by television due to a wide-ranging audience with conservative sensibilities are often covered with a lot of discussion and detail with talk radio (Hendy, 2000).

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an article on The Waikato River and the Maori. It needs to be at least 2500 words. In places where there have been settlements by colonizers, the original inhabitants of that area have had recourse to objects of nature to maintain a sense of fixedness and continuity as well. The Waikato River represents for the Maori people of New Zealand an entity that does not change in spite of the repeated encroachments in other areas of their culture by the forces of colonial modernity. In this regard, it is important to analyze the nature of the importance of legislation that has come up in the past in relation to the use of natural objects and in particular, water bodies. They hold special significance for people of the Maori tribes as they were the source of life for these tribes for a very long time. It provided the water for agriculture and at the same time, also provided the Waikato tribes with the fish that they needed for their survival.

Having played such an important part in the lives of these tribes of New Zealand, it is easy to understand the insecurities that were experienced by people at the time when large parts of the land adjoining the Waikato River were sold to people who had come to New Zealand with the intention of colonizing the land. The matter became one of social and tribal prestige and hence is closely connected with the sense of loss of identity that these people faced at a point of time in history (The Waikato River and its Catchment, 2012).

An analysis of the importance of the Waikato River in modern times for the tribes that have been using its resources for a very long time needs to be analyzed through the recent legislation that has been made in this respect. The Resource Management Act of the state of New Zealand sought to reduce the activities of construction that were considered to be harmful to the ecology of the area. This is indeed a commendable achievement since, in most countries, protests and action for the dispossessed&nbsp.have been stalled or decimated by lobbies of businessmen and other interests that have more, supposedly, to offer a modern state.