What did Werner mean by “microgenesis” and “microgenetic mobility?” Give examples. Discuss some valuable aspects of these concepts.

1. Early social smiles are elicited:

A.Primarily by faces, so long as they look human.
B.About equally by faces and high-pitched voices.
C.Primarily by faces in the frontal position.
D.Primarily by the principal and secondary attachment figures.

 

2.Ainsworth describes insecure-avoidant children as:

A.Avoiding new situations whenever possible.
B.Avoiding strangers at all costs, but clinging to the mother.
C.Consistently independent in both the home and the Strange Situation.
D.Reacting defensively to the threat of maternal unresponsiveness.

 

3.Montessori materials with “control of error:”

A.Enable children to detect their own errors.
B.Keep errors to a minimum.
C.Stimulate thinking by presenting carefully controlled errors.
D.Guide children toward mastery in gradual steps.

 

4.In Montessori’s view, the teacher should be:

A.An authority to whom the child can turn for sound advice.
B.Mainly out of the picture.
C.Sociable and creative.
D.Affectionate but not smothering.

 

5.The text criticizes Werner for:

A.Being unclear on the discontinuity issue.
B.Not taking clear stands.
C.Overvaluing children’s experience.
D.Being too phenomenological.

6.In Kohlberg’s just community approach:

A.Moral dialogue and moral atmosphere frequently advance moral thinking two or more stages.
B.High school students are frequently friendlier to one another, but their moral thinking remains about the same.
C.There is little relationship between moral thought and moral behavior.
D.The moral thinking of high school students advances somewhat, primarily from stage 2 to 3.

 

7.Briefly contrast the views of Locke and Rousseau on how children develop.

 

8. Two part question:

a) What do ethologists, such as Lorenz, mean by imprinting on a parent-figure?
b) What observations led Bowlby to suggest that imprinting occurs in human infants? That is, what parallels between human infants and other species did he point to?

 

9.”For children to learn, we must praise their correct responses and correct their mistakes.” Would Montessori agree? Explain.

 

10.What did Werner mean by “microgenesis” and “microgenetic mobility?” Give examples. Discuss some valuable aspects of these concepts.

 

11.Piaget’s critics charge that he made development appear too slow. Discuss this criticism with respect to either: a) object permanence, b) conservation training, or c) Kamii’s teaching methods. Then, describe the Piagetian approach.

 

12. Compare conventional and postconventional morality in Kohlberg’s theory.

Explain under what conditions they may not be acceptable and under what conditions, if any, they may be appropriate.

Is the Measure of Consistency a State of Mind?

In your unit readings from the Psychological Testing and Assessment text, you read about three sources of error variance that occur in testing and assessment. These include test construction, test administration, and test scoring and interpretation. Additionally, other sources of error may be suspect. You were also introduced to reliability coefficients, which provide information about these sources of error variance on a test (see Table 5-4).

The following reliability coefficients were obtained from studies on a new test, THING, purporting to measure a new construct (that is, Something). Alternate forms of the test were also developed and examined in subsequent studies published in the peer-reviewed journals. The alternate test forms were titled THING 1 and THING 2. (Remember to refer back to your Psychological Testing and Assessment text for information about using and interpreting a coefficient of reliability.)

  • Internal consistency reliability coefficient = .92
  • Alternate forms reliability coefficient = .82
  • Test-retest reliability coefficient = .50

In your post:

  • Describe what these scores mean.
  • Interpret these results individually in terms of the information they provide on sources of error variance.
  • Synthesize all of these interpretations into a final evaluation about this test’s utility or usefulness.
  • Explain whether these data are acceptable.
  • Explain under what conditions they may not be acceptable and under what conditions, if any, they may be appropriate.

Compare at least one evidence-based and one non-evidence-based treatment option for the diagnosis. Research a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources to support your choices.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, please read Chapter 1: Differential Diagnosis Step by Step in DSM-5: Handbook of Differential Diagnosis and review the same case study you used to write your Weeks One and Two discussion forums and Week Three Assignment.
For this assignment, you will create a differential diagnosis for the patient in your chosen case. This assignment continues the work you started in the Weeks One and Two discussion forums and the Week Three assignment. Be sure to follow the instructions in Chapter 1: Differential Diagnosis Step by Step when creating your differential diagnosis. Your assignment must include the following:

· Recommend a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms, presenting problems, and history.

· Assess the validity of your diagnosis using a sociocultural perspective.

· Compare at least one evidence-based and one non-evidence-based treatment option for the diagnosis. Research a minimum of two peer-reviewed sources to support your choices.

· Propose and provide an explanation for a minimum of two historical perspectives and two theoretical orientations that are inappropriate alternates for the conceptualizations in this case.

The Making a Differential Diagnosis assignment

· Must be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

· Must include a separate title page with the following:

o Title of paper

o Student’s name

o Course name and number

o Instructor’s name

o Date submitted

· Must use at least two peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.

· Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

· Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Please be sure that your comments to peers are substantive; in other words, do not simply write “I agree”; if you agree, go on to expand your comments and add your own insights.

Fromm’s concept of the syndrome of decay included three personality disorders: (1) necrophilia, or love of death; (2) malignant narcissism, or extreme self- interest; and (3) incestuous symbiosis, or a passionate devotion to one’s mother or a mother substitute. For example, Fromm identified Adolf Hitler as the most conspicuous example of a person with the syndrome of decay. If Fromm’s concepts are valid, we should see the syndrome of decay traits in contemporary personalities.
Your task is to search for recent examples of well-known people with the syndrome of decay; pay special attention to malignant narcissism and incestuous symbiosis. For each example you find, full explain and defend your analysis.
Please post your findings. In addition, pose one follow-up question to the class and respond to the questions of at least TWO of your classmates.
Erich Fromm

 
General Discussion Reminders:
You are required to post your initial answers by Friday at midnight; your comments on the postings of your classmates are due on Sunday at midnight. Please be sure that your comments to peers are substantive; in other words, do not simply write “I agree”; if you agree, go on to expand your comments and add your own insights.
I will use the following grading rubric to score your discussion postings:

 

    • 1 – 3 points – Provided only minimal response with no elaboration OR failed to complete follow-up postings.

 

    • 4 – 7 points – Provided basic response and follow-up postings. All postings are clear and relevant, but need to be elaborated in more detail.

 

  • 8 – 10 points – Provided detailed, complete responses and follow-up postings. All responses are elaborated and clear.