Review the posts of other learners and respond to at least two of them. Be cognizant of the problem of obtaining critical historical information in order to differentiate the diagnoses, but assess whether or not the other learners have adequately addressed this issue.

Bipolar Disorders

In your Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (6th Edition) text, critique the strengths and weaknesses of the Bipolar Disorders section, including such factors as its structure and organization, ease of use, and the primary research and methodological considerations that were used to establish the criteria for these disorders.

In particular, assess how you differentiate between Bipolar I Disorder, Bipolar II Disorder, and a Cyclothymic Disorder, and how these came to be viewed as different diagnoses in the development of the DSM. This will entail some research outside of required course materials.

Response Guidelines

Review the posts of other learners and respond to at least two of them. Be cognizant of the problem of obtaining critical historical information in order to differentiate the diagnoses, but assess whether or not the other learners have adequately addressed this issue. Explain and support your position.

DQ 2

 

Principal Diagnoses

Based on the material presented in the Case Study of Bill:

  1. Provide the DSM-5 differential diagnoses for Bill, including a listing of “Other Factors,” and support your decision process with a brief narrative.
  2. Refer to the two ICD-10-CM appendices in your DSM-5 text, pages 839–862 and 877–896 and detail any differences in the diagnosis that you might find if you were to use the ICD-10 to arrive at the diagnosis or diagnoses. (As this is your first look at the comparison between the ICD-10 and the DSM classification systems, you may want to take a little time to understand how these systems relate to each other.)
  3. Explain the etiological factors that you think are relevant in this case along with their reasons, keeping the diathesis-stress model in mind. You will need to do some research to clearly explain and support your reasons for suspecting these etiological factors.
  4. List the three primary issues that need to be addressed in a treatment plan for Bill.

Review the Case Study Response Guide to assist you with this discussion.

Response Guidelines

Review the posts of other learners and respond to at least two of them. Can you add anything to their diagnoses and perspectives on the etiological factors involved in Bill’s symptoms, or to their treatment plan ideas? Explain your comments thoroughly.

Assignment

 

Review the Case Study of Bill. This case study is used for the second discussion as well as for this assignment.

Use the Case Study Response Guide to format your assignment. In Section 4 of the response guide, address each of the following:

  1. What diagnostic possibilities does Bill’s case present?
  2. What have you read in the case history so far that presents these possibilities for you?
  3. What kind of questions you might ask to evaluate each diagnostic possibility? You must consider at least two—but no more than three—diagnostic possibilities and develop a series of questions to interview for each possibility.
  4. What possible answers would lead you toward or away from each of your possibilities?

Note: Your instructor may also use the APA Writing Feedback Rubric to provide additional feedback on your academic writing. The writing feedback rubric does not affect your assignment grade, but its feedback may factor into the grading criteria, if professional communication and writing is a course competency. Evaluate your own work using this rubric. Refer to the Learner Guide for instructions on viewing instructor feedback.

 

Case Study of Bill

Instructions: Read the following case, and then post your answer to the discussion topics. Read two of your colleagues’ responses and provide a critical evaluation of each response.

Once you have completed your discussion posts and responses, follow the directions in u04a1 Case Study of Bill to complete your assignment for this unit.

Bill is a middle-aged, married, Caucasian male who has two grown children. Bill’s father passed away when Bill was in college, and this loss still pains him. He held his father in extremely high regard and at times referred to him as “brilliant,” even though his father did not graduate from high school. His father worked at a skilled trade until he suffered a fatal illness in his late 40s or early 50s. Bill laments the loss of his father and, in particular, the guidance he thought his father could have provided during turbulent times in Bill’s life.

According to the pattern of alcohol use that Bill describes, it is likely that Bill’s father had a serious drinking problem, if he was not actually an alcoholic. Bill’s mother, who is also deceased, is described by Bill as a strong woman and the matriarch of the family. While Bill states that he had much respect for her, it seems that his respect was also tinged with fear of her disapproval. She never accepted or understood why Bill chose the college he did and why he had an interest in an Army career.

Bill states that his mother never used alcohol. He describes her as a very critical and judgmental person. His family of origin was devout in their religious beliefs, and this appears to play a significant role in Bill’s life. He is close to his siblings, but they do not talk often, and he feels guilt for not initiating calls to them. His hesitation to call them is due in part to a fear that they will reject him. It is for this reason that he also tries to keep conversations with them at a superficial level. His extended family includes people who have achieved at the highest levels of government and their professions.

Bill graduated from a prestigious college and embarked on a military career, which was his lifelong ambition. A “vindictive” superior officer who gave him poor performance evaluations cut Bill’s career short. It turns out that Bill may have had much more of a role in this than he is aware of or initially admits. He acknowledges a lengthy period of indecision and marginal adherence to military standards at the beginning of his career, but relates that he eventually got over that “down time.” Nonetheless, Bill developed the persona of hero in both military matters and civilian jobs, and to this day, he compares himself with heroic figures from antiquity and sees himself on the verge of doing something great, “if,” he says, “I can ever get over this serious case of the blues I’ve been experiencing for the past months.” He indicates that he has felt this way, “empty, really,” nearly all day every day for at least two to three months. As he says this he appears tearful. He relates that there was no particular incident or event that started him feeling this way. “It just came over me,” he says.

He reports that he has, in fact, lost interest in any kind of work or activities over the last months, and finds joy in literally nothing. He has no energy and reports that others have been asking him why he’s so plodding and slow about everything lately. He has great difficulty getting out of bed in the morning and constantly thinks about suicide. While he feared death as a young man, he now says he would welcome it. He has been on Prozac “and things” for years and questions whether it is working.

Bill is awash in guilt. He feels guilt for things he has done and for things he has not done. He has a disarming smile that belies the pain he feels and keeps people from prying into his life. He has one or two drinks of Jack Daniels, neat, each night. Psychotherapy is difficult with him because of the chronic nature of his problems and his fear of alienating people who are close to him. He seems to genuinely believe that his expectations of other people are fair and reasonable, but he is so disappointed in “everything” that he doesn’t know what there is to live for.

Bill places unrealistic importance on the support available from his nuclear family. Yet, he says he is cautious around them because if he says or does the wrong thing, they might leave him or tell him to leave. He is, he adds, feeling pretty worthless and guilty about ridiculous little things he’s done and said to his family. He knows he has been emotionally “fragile” the last few months; in particular, he has found himself increasingly irritable. He expresses anger at his adult children because they do not appear as devoted to him as he was and still is to his late father. However, Bill keeps this anger to himself for fear of rejection. He has also recently experienced conflict with his wife of many years. It is not possible for her to meet his expectations for support, so he becomes angry with her, but withholds the expression of his anger for fear of alienating her.

Below are the required topics that should be viewed from the perspective of: How is this related to personality? Each topic (article selected) must be clearly connected to personality.

The Research Paper Outline must include a title page, abstract page, content using the required headings, and reference page. The outline itself must include three complete sentences under each heading with in-text citations. The three sentences under each heading should reflect current research regarding each topic as it relates to personality as well as for me to clearly understand the proposed direction of the paper. The required outline must be followed (listed on the next page).

 

 

 

The Reference Page must include six scholarly journal articles (provided, these are the only reference items to be used for this assignment, select six of the 10 to use for this assignment).

 

 

 

Must include in-text citations these are a requirement! Paraphrasing is required; direct quotes are not allowed in the Research Paper Outline. If APA formatted in-text citations are not used for this assignment, a zero will be assigned. Make sure to use proper APA formatted headings.

 

 

 

The sample outline format is attached along with the list of APA references and the journal articles only these may be used for this assignment.

 

 

 

Below are the required topics that should be viewed from the perspective of: How is this related to personality? Each topic (article selected) must be clearly connected to personality.

 

 

 

  1. Nature versus Nurture
  2. The Unconscious
  3. View of Self
  4. Development
  5. Motivation
  6. Maturation 

 

On the Reference list I have each topic listed under the appropriate reference to be used for that topic section.

 

Identify any sub-questions that require answers in order to address the primary question. What are they?

Earlier in the course, you converted your research topic into an overarching or primary research question. Even the most focused research question may contain within it a series of more fundamental and related questions. Once these are determined, the researcher must then determine the kinds of information necessary to answer it.

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following EPAs and practice behaviors:

  • EPA 2.1.3: Apply critical thinking to inform and communicate professional judgments.
    • PB 2.1.3.A: Distinguish, appraise, and integrate multiple sources of knowledge, including research-based knowledge, and practice wisdom.
      • Related Assignment Criteria:
        • 3. Describe data sources (artifacts, literature, et cetera) relevant to a given research problem.
        • 5. Explain the approach to relevant data interpretation.
  • EPA 2.1.10: Engage, assess, intervene, and evaluate with individuals, families, groups, organizations, and communities.
    • PB 2.1.10(b).A: Collect, organize, and interpret client data.
      • Related Assignment Criteria:
        • 4. Identify contextually appropriate data-collection tools.
        • 5. Explain the approach to relevant data interpretation.
        • 6. Explain the appropriate audience for final data analysis.

Assignment Description

In this assignment, you will identify a series of sub-questions that must be answered in order to find the answer or answers to the primary question. You will also begin to identify the kinds of data you will need, from whom you will gather it, and which methods you will apply to your proposed study. The approach you use “may depend on your topic, purpose, and intended use of the study results, as well as the orientation toward social science that you adopt” (Neuman, 2013, p. 110).

The sub-questions you have identified will help you determine the kinds of data you would need to collect in order to address your research question. Who will be answering these questions: who will your participants be? Is the data quantitative or qualitative in nature—should it be in the form of numbers or words? What methods might you apply to glean the information that you seek? What instruments, measures, or tools would you use in your study?

Also, identify how you would analyze the data that you collect. Will you be conducting statistical analyses of any kind? Or, will you be using coding and categorizing? Will you be using any computer software to assist with the analysis?

Finally, consider the results of the study. Who should know about these results? How will you present them?

Assignment Instructions

For this assignment:

  1. Restate your overarching research question.
  2. Identify any sub-questions that require answers in order to address the primary question. What are they?
  3. What kind of data do you need to address the questions?
    • Who are your proposed study participants?
    • Are you seeking information represented by numbers or words? Stated differently, are you interested in quantitative or qualitative data, or both?
  4. Identify the instruments or tools that you would use to collect data.
  5. What approach to data analysis do you intend to use?
    • Explain why you have selected this approach.
    • Will you use any computer software or programs to assist with the data analysis?
  6. To whom will you present the results of the study and why?
    • How do you propose to present them?
    • What format would be most appropriate to communicate your results to your audience?

Additional Requirements

The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.
  • Length of paper: Minimum of three double-spaced pages.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Due date: Assignment must be submitted to your instructor in the courseroom no later than 11:59 p.m. on Sunday of this week.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Reference

Neuman, W. L. (2012). Basics of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Resources

  • Data Collection and Analysis Scoring Guide.
  • SWK Library Guide.
  • APA Style & Format.
  • Capella Writing Center.
  • Writing Feedback Tool.
  • RAILS.

Provide information about theoretical underpinnings such as empirical/behavioral or constructivist and humanistic orientations of the literature reviewed.

The grading rubric is attached

LSQ: What does psychology literature tell us about relationship between school related anxiety cyber bullying and school bullying how do all connect with each other.

Age Group-13-14

Connections of school bullying and Cyberbullying narrow it down to three aspects. Choose Gender

  • Literature Review Draft
    Preparation
    In addition to the other helpful links provided in Resources, we recommend you use an organizing tool from the Capella University Library Services and Tools page, such as the Scholarly Research Log, to help you track the theories, methods, and findings of the articles you have read.
    Note: Be sure to post your draft of the literature review in the Unit 4 discussion and incorporate feedback from your instructor and peers before submitting this assignment.
    Instructions
    For this assignment, submit the current draft of your literature review for instructor feedback and grading. Using your literature search question (LSQ), the annotated bibliography, and the abstracted outline to support your review, identify themes that emerge from your analysis of what we know so far about your topic. Use these themes to describe how your research builds on prior knowledge.
    For instance, if your LSQ is What does the literature in psychology tell us about the utility of treating mild depression in adults with a combination of synchronous and asynchronous labyrinth walking and cognitive behavioral therapy? you might discuss literature that covers the themes of exercise and depression, cognitive behavioral therapy and depression, walking meditation and depression, mindfulness and depression, and so on. Do not organize the paper by referencing each article sequentially; your task is to synthesize concepts pertinent to the LSQ from the articles selected for this review.
    Plan to identify articles and research that:

    • Describe chosen area of research and provide rationale for choice.
    • Describe significance of chosen topic:
      • Explain and justify the implications of the new knowledge for stakeholders, including community members and those who serve the population.
    • Summarize sources applicable to the history of chosen topic:
      • Discuss historical context and dominant themes in the evolution of the topic; connect common themes and present counteropinions.
      • Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, and Clark Moustakas.
    • Summarize sources applicable to the theoretical background of the chosen topic:
      • Provide information about theoretical underpinnings such as empirical/behavioral or constructivist and humanistic orientations of the literature reviewed.
      • Consider theory in light of seminal works by theorists such as Urie Bronfenbrenner, Sigmund Freud, B.F. Skinner, Carol Gilligan, Jean Piaget, Erving Goffman, and Clark Moustakas.
    • Summarize sources applicable to best practices for engaging in research:
      • Describe data-collection strategies, research procedures, and approaches for conducting and reporting research.
    • Summarize sources that add significance and relevance to the knowledge base of psychology:
      • Indicate how the chosen sources help investigators identify topics that are well understood and other topics that represent gaps in the knowledge base and the need for further study.
      • Create a scenario that illustrates the need for new research.
    • Articulate guidelines of the profession applicable to ethical conduct in research practice:
      • Demonstrate ethical conduct associated with the protection of research subject vulnerabilities such as the need for data privacy.
    • Identify practices and research guidelines that address respect for individual differences and diversity:
      • Address individual variation and diversity within and across groups. For example, when writing about marriage and family therapy, acknowledge research choices that exclude or include subgroups such as gay and lesbian families or families of particular racial, ethnic, or cultural compositions.
    • Adhere to APA style and formatting guidelines, including concise and well-organized writing:
      • Organize paper to enhance the message and supporting points; writing should reflect the quality and expertise expected for academic work.
      • Organize and summarize sources thematically.
    • Your task is to present current considerations important to investigators and to indicate ramifications for stakeholders who rely on the current knowledge base. Use illustrative examples to explain and highlight key concepts. Good reviewers share evidence-based assessments of the current state of knowledge with their audiences.
      This assignment is one component of the integrated project. You are expected to refine this literature review before submitting the final project.
      Additional Requirements
    • Formatting:
      • Organize your assignment as follows:
        • Title page.
        • Chapter headings (should start on new page).
        • Subheadings.
    • Font: New Times Roman, 12 point, double-spaced.
    • APA: Use APA format and style throughout, including citations.
    • Review the assignment scoring guide to ensure that you meet all criteria.
      Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.
      Resources
    • Literature Review Draft Scoring Guide.
    • Capella Library: More Services and Tools.
    • Capella University Library.
    • Capella Writing Center.
    • Writing Feedback Tool.
    • APA Style and Format.
    • Principles and Procedures for Writing a Literature Review [PDF].
  • Toggle DrawerUpdates and HandoutsPeriodically, information will be posted in this space for the good of the class.