Explain the importance of a substance use disorder counselor having an understanding of tolerance and withdrawal. What potential issues could arise if the counselor did not have this knowledge?

Each Question must be answer BY itself and be about 150-200 words and have a quote in the answer. MUST ALSO PASS TURN IT IN WITH LES THAN 5%

1.1   This week, you studied various theories of addiction and learned about the human body’s reaction to substances. With all the scientific knowledge we now have about addiction, why is there more than one etiology of addiction? Why is it important to have a multidisciplinary approach when addressing addiction? Provide an explanation in your response.

1.2   In preparation for this week’s assignment, review substance use disorders and process addictions. How do process addictions differ from substance use disorders? What are three ways in which the treatment approach will vary from process addition to substance use disorders?

2.1    Explain the importance of a substance use disorder counselor having an understanding of tolerance and withdrawal. What potential issues could arise if the counselor did not have this knowledge? Provide at least one example in your response. Additionally, discuss how a substance use disorder could mimic and/or co-occur with a variety of neurological, medical, and psychological disorders as discussed in the Differential Diagnoses sections of the Substance Use Disorders chapter in the DSM.

2.2    In many states, marijuana is now legal for certain medical purposes. Identify some clinical issues that may now present themselves because of this. What if you have a client who is addicted to alcohol and narcotics, who is also using marijuana to help with chronic pain? How might you address this situation? Discuss the importance of applying crisis management skills.

3.1    Why is it important to integrate coordinated treatments for co-occurring disorders?  Provide at least two examples of the potential financial challenges associated with managing the implementation of treatment.

3.2   What are the different types of psychoeducation and psychotherapeutic clinical group therapies often used in treatment of substance use disorders?  How would the prescreening process for referrals look different for each? If you determined a client needed a referral for an alternative treatment, how would you describe the referral process and complementary treatment alternatives?

4.1    Support groups are separate from clinical therapy groups. Why is it important for substance use disorders counselors to know what happens in non-clinical support groups? How could this knowledge benefit treatment?

4.2   Why is it important to develop an empathetic relationship with a client with a substance use disorder? How would you challenge behaviors and thoughts that are not recovery promoting and how would you provide information to them relating to substance use disorder and treatment?

Your original post, in response to the discussion prompt above, should contain a minimum of 125 words, not including restatement of questions or reference sections

Module 2 Discussion Assignment

Details Chapter 2

The Case of Charles Whitman

Watch the video on Charles Whitman before responding to discussion question.

(Charles Whitman – The Killing of America) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hA4M04prVK8

As a child and young man, Charles Whitman was kind, quiet, and known by all as a “good boy” serving as both an altar boy and an Eagle Scout. As a student at the University of Texas, however, he began to experience severe headaches, assaulted his wife, and became involved in numerous fights. He confided to his psychiatrist that he was fighting the urge toward even more extreme violent behavior. He lost the fight. Climbing to the top of the campus observation tower with a high-powered rifle, he shot wildly at his fellow students, ultimately killing 14 people and wounding more than 20 before the police finally killed him. An autopsy on Whitman’s body revealed a large tumor pressing against his amygdala.

1. Recognizing that this area of the brain is known to regulate aggressive behaviors in animals (the research is less clear for humans), should Whitman be held fully responsible for his actions? Why or why not?

2. If Whitman had lived, would you have been in favor of capital punishment or life imprisonment for his crimes?

3. Imagine that scientists were able to identify specific genes linked to serious criminal behavior and it was possible to remove or redesign these genes. Are you in favor of this type of gene manipulation? Why or why not?

Guidelines

Before you begin, remember to review the class Discussion Board Guidelines.

Your original post, in response to the discussion prompt above, should contain a minimum of 125 words, not including restatement of questions or reference sections. Utilize critical thinking, and support your work with additional resources as applicable.

In addition, read and respond to the posts of two of your peers/classmates. Your response must be 100 words, substantive, and expand the discussion.

Finally, any content that is paraphrased, summarized or quoted in your discussion post or response must be must be cited using APA format. For more information on APA format, review the OWL Guide: APA General FormatLinks to an external site.

Chapter PowerPoint attached & guidelines

ebook-  https://customer.wileyplus.com/CGI-BIN/lansaweb?procfun+wileyplus2+WP2FN09+funcparms+LMSTOKEN(L1000):383261E2-0AC8-0221-59BD-BF40C72EB47D$$38326077-0AC8-0221-078C-27A8F8DA679E+LMSHASH(L2500):MzgzMjYxRTItMEFDOC0wMjIxLTU5QkQtQkY0MEM3MkVCNDdEQ2Fud

: Write a 150-250-word summary, discussing specific behaviors that lead you to create a risk assessment. Part 3: Write a 500-750-word summary, discussing how you would assess the Eliza. [CACREP 2.F.7.c]

As a counselor, being competent and familiar with risk assessment is essential to the therapeutic process; both in giving a client’s context related to treatment of their psychological symptoms and in helping the clinician prioritize short- and long-term treatment outcomes. This assignment contains three parts, as identified and described below. Please complete each part with a combined essay of 950-1,700 words.

Part 1: Read Eliza’s Case Study: Part Two and describe a scenario from the case study that you believe requires a risk assessment.

Part 2: Write a 150-250-word summary, discussing specific behaviors that lead you to create a risk assessment.

Part 3: Write a 500-750-word summary, discussing how you would assess the Eliza. [CACREP 2.F.7.c]

Include the following in your discussion:

  • Questions you would ask to determine the client’s level of risk.
  • The protocol you would follow based on the client’s answers, including documentation.
  • Include at least three scholarly references in your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

A minimum of  3 scholarly peered reviewed article  must be sited using APA format 500 words for each topic 81 and 82

 

Topic 81

Biases are something we all have, and it is important to be aware of what biases you have in order to monitor them carefully. Biases can be personal or professional in nature and confronting biases can help to overcome them. Discuss some areas on which you hold biases (divorce, domestic violence, death penalty, spanking, etc.)

What are your personal/professional biases? What harm can result from not being aware of them? What standards are violated if they are not acknowledged and addressed?

Topic 82

Dr. Jones has a client who is of a different culture and faith. He is not comfortable dealing with this patient due to past negative feelings from childhood. What are his ethical and legal obligations? Why are these legal and ethical obligations in place?

Explain the intent of each experiment and its key findings. Then, determine how each experiment contributes to your understanding of human behavior. What influence does or could this experiment have on psychology today?

Activity Description

 

Begin by selecting three classic psychology experiments from the provided list below. All of these were conducted prior to the establishment of Institutional Review Boards. Conduct a search for scholarly resources that provide an overview of the experiment and the identified

controversy.

 

Harlow’s Rhesus Monkey Experiments

Johnson’s The Monster Study

Landis’ Facial Expressions Experiment

Money’s David Reimer Experiment

Seligman’s Learned Helplessness Experiment

Sherif’s Robber Cave Experiment

Watson’s Little Albert Experiment

 

Weigh the merits of the three classic psychology experiments that you selected from this list. Briefly, summarize the three experiments.

 

Explain the intent of each experiment and its key findings. Then, determine how each experiment contributes to your understanding of human behavior. What influence does or could this experiment have on psychology today?

 

Drawing on the skill builders for this week, identify at least three major ethical issues that exist in each experiment. Assess whether the experiment could be conducted today as it was originally presented. Explain what changes would be required to ensure that the research would be conducted according to today’s professional standards.

 

Support your paper with reference to five research articles published in peer-reviewed journals or other scholarly sources. You are encouraged to dig a bit deeper to locate seminal articles that are older and critical to your paper. Use your judgment to determine the appropriate resources that best support your paper.