There is a Rubics:

 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%3
Satisfactory
75.00%4
Good
85.00%5
Excellent
100.00%70.0 %Content 20.0 %Compare the research design of the two studies chosen.Comparison of research designs chosen are missing.Comparison of research designs chosen are vague and inconsistent.Comparison of research designs chosen are present and appropriate.Comparison of research designs chosen are present and makes some connection to research.Comparison of research designs chosen are concise and well-research; makes connections to current research.20.0 %Identify the independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable.Identification of independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable are missing.Identification of independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable are vague and inconsistent.Identification of independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable are present and appropriate.Identification of independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable are present and makes some connection to research.Identification of independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable are thorough and concise; makes connections to current research.15.0 %Identify the main effects and interactions for the factorial designs.Identification for main effects and interactions for factorial designs are missing.Identification for main effects and interactions for factorial designs are vague and inconsistent.Identification for main effects and interactions for factorial designs are present and appropriate.Identification for main effects and interactions for factorial designs are present and makes some connection to research.Identification for main effects and interactions for factorial designs are thorough and concise; makes connections to current research.15.0 %Explain if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment and other limitations noticed.Explanation if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment and other limitations noticed is missing.Explanation if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment and other limitations noticed is vague and inconsistent.Explanation if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment and other limitations noticed is present and appropriate.Explanation if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment and other limitations noticed is present and makes some connection to research.Explanation if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment and other limitations noticed is thorough and well-researched; makes connections to current research.20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 8.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.7.0 %Paragraph Development and TransitionsParagraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

The Essay Part:

 

For this assignment, again, it is beneficial that you keep the topic you would like to research for the capstone proposal in mind. The capstone will require a literature review for your proposal, of which you may use articles obtained during this course.

Select a peer-reviewed, experimental research study that exemplifies a two-group design and a factorial design (use keywords method, results, and discussion in your Boolean search). These studies can be found using tools such as the GCU Library and Google Scholar.

The topic is Recidivism and Rehabilitation in the criminal justice system, with the participants receiving drug and life skill inside jails and prisons.

There must be in text citations along with citations listed on a reference page

Write a 500-750-word paper in which you:

1. Compare the two research designs.
2. Identify the independent variable(s), dependent variable, and any possible extraneous variable.
3. Identify main effects and interactions for the factorial design.
4. Explain if the study has a random sample and/or random assignment. Were there other limitations that were noticed?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

1. Do you think communication is more important to leaders now than it was in Hitler’s and FDR’s time? Explain why you think so or why you disagree. Who is a more current charismatic leader that you know of, and how are they similar to Hitler or FDR in their communication style?

 

2.
Consider the findings from the Ohio State and Michigan studies: Good leadership requires effectiveness on two dimensions – initiating structure, commonly called task orientation, and showing consideration, commonly called employee orientation. Evaluate a leader you know using those two dimensions of good leadership. Describe how well that leader manages both those dimensions. What is the outcome of their strengths or weaknesses in those dimensions?

a. Describe a situation that would call for a more task oriented leader.
b. In what situations would a more employee oriented leader be more successful?

Which orientation do you reflect in your style of leadership? Why do you tend to lean toward that style?

 

ndividual assignment: McFarlane Case, p. 65 (Manning & Curtis): “Part One Video Case, Toying with Success: The McFarlane Companies”

 

3. After reading the case, answer “Questions for Discussion” 1 and 2 SEE ATTACHED, providing evidence for points you make. Then, include a well thought-out and reflective 6 to 10-line personal conclusion.