performance management 7217651 2

/in /by

This assignment consists of two (2) parts: a project schedule, and a written response. You must submit both parts as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the part of the assignment it is written for.

 

Part A: Project Schedule
(Submit as one [1] Microsoft Project file)

  1. Create a multilevel work breakdown structure (WBS) and detailed project schedule based upon the information from Appendix 13.2. 

Part B: Written Response
(Submit as a Microsoft Word file)

Write a one to two (1-2) page response in which you:

  1. Summarize the project’s performance in terms of schedule and costs.
  2. Recommend corrective actions (at least two [2] total) to improve the project’s performance. 
  3. Give your opinion on what you foresee as the greatest risk to the project.
  4. Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
    • Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post performance management 7217651 2 appeared first on Essay Writers.

BUS 3150 Stanford University Fund of Human Resource Management Discussions

/in /by

Question Description

Please answer the questions at the end of the chapter. Find a recent (last 3-6 months) article relating to a topic covered in the chapter and write a brief summary, explicitly relating the article to the topic (so I don’t have to guess at the relationship). Please provide a reference for the article. word limit:250-300.

Question:

Discussion Starter,

What barriers to career advancement do women and minorities face?

 

“Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!”

The post BUS 3150 Stanford University Fund of Human Resource Management Discussions appeared first on Coursework Geeks.

Change Theory vs. Motivational Interviewing

/in /by

Change Theory vs. Motivational Interviewing
The post Change Theory vs. Motivational Interviewing first appeared on | Nursing Homework Help Service.

budget-assignment-management-homework-help

/in /by

Refer to the City of Granston Case 11-3 at the end of Chapter 11. Using the ‘Current Year Q-3’ data found in Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3, create a project supply and materials budget based on the information in the case. Your budget must include a one page explanation on the importance of a materials supply budget and the impact of the budget on the supply organization.

City of Granston*

On November 25, Ted Barton, the new purchasing manager at the City of Granston in Canada, was considering a contract extension for two years for the supply of mineral aggregates (rock, sand, and gravel). The contract had to be signed within a week.

CITY OF GRANSTON

The City of Granston had an annual budget of $700 million and employed 9,000 people. There had been a steady population increase over the past two decades. The purchasing department consisted of three support staff, six buyers, and a manager. City budgets were usually adjusted annually to cover the cost of inflation.

THE AGGREGATE INDUSTRY

The city purchased about $3 million worth of aggregates for road construction and repairs and construction projects. The local mineral aggregate sector consisted of three major extracting and processing companies—Lamoulin, Richmond, and Atlantic—and several smaller ones. Lamoulin and Atlantic owned the two dominant concrete production facilities.

The local aggregate industry was near capacity with major construction projects underway and increased demand in export markets.

AGGREGATE PURCHASING

A request for quotation had been issued in 2000 for a three-year agreement for the supply of aggregates, with prices firm for the first three years. If the parties agreed, a two-year option was available, with prices being subject to inflation.

Lamoulin and Richmond were the only two bidders and each received about half of the total contract with each bidder quoting for separate components of the total aggregates contract (see Exhibit 1).

Page 311

EXHIBIT 1 A Selection of Mineral Aggregates Supplied by Lamoulin and Richmond

Prices include delivery and are in $Cdn based on annual estimated requirements.

* Lamoulin

** Richmond

On November 25, both Lamoulin and Richmond sent notice that they were willing to extend the current three-year contract to five years. Both wanted an increase of 2 percent to cover the increased cost of doing business. The suppliers were referring to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) clause in the agreement for price reviews. This clause allowed the supplier an annual price increase based on the change in the CPI. According to the city engineers’ department, both suppliers had performed reasonably well during the past three years. Because of a significant slump in the local construction industry, both suppliers had voluntarily lowered their prices by about 3 percent after year one of the contract.

However, in the past few months the local economy had shown signs of revival.

TED BARTON

Ted Barton had become purchasing manager for the City of Granston after having worked in private industry as a supply manager for several decades. He had been selected because the city’s administrators wished to integrate supply better into the overall decision processes and to help search for better value for the taxpayer’s dollars. Shortly after arriving on his new job, Ted Barton hired a part-time professional to help him develop better metrics for the city’s supply function. One of the metrics that concerned Ted was the city’s price performance. Thus, he developed a representative basket of 128 city requirements for which the amount used appeared to vary little from year to year. For this basket he asked his assistant to develop a price index, going back three years, starting with a base of 100.0 (see Exhibit 2).

Ted’s assistant also developed a list of key cost indicators based on published indices from a variety of sources (see Exhibit 3).

THE DECISION

Ted Barton wondered whether any of the metrics he had recently developed were relevant for his decision on whether to extend the current mineral aggregates contract.

Since a significant number of existing city contracts were also of the multiyear, extendable type, he believed his actions on the aggregate contract might have a bearing on how to deal with other requirements. Having only one week left, he wondered what action to take.

EXHIBIT 2 City of Granston Price Index for a 128-Item Basket of City Requirements

Page 312

EXHIBIT 3 Selected List of Key Cost Indicators

(Johnson, 07/2010, pp. 310-312)

Johnson, P. F., Leenders, M., Flynn, A. (07/2010). Purchasing and Supply Management, 14th Edition [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/1259960811

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post budget-assignment-management-homework-help appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.