Need help with my writing homework on The Equality Among Religions. Write a 1250 word paper answering; Suzanne wrote, “I had found myself wanting to discard beliefs that wouldn’t please neither Priscilla nor Rayna.”&nbsp.Hereafter it illustrates how Suzanne discard her belief to please others, it was not an interfaith dialogue since she didn’t talk about things that may make others uncomfortable.

Then Ranya, not surprisingly, complained further.&nbsp.Complaints about Ramadan and not being able to fast in it because she was lonely. She only stops whining when she finds an Imam who allows her to carry out beliefs and rituals that have nothing to do with Islam. While Pricilla did believe that God in all of them.

The most Leonard Swindler’s “Dialogue Decalogue” which are important most important for successful interfaith dialogue is the first and Fourth commandment. The first commandment explains how the primary purpose of the discussion is to study, that-is transformation and growth in the insight and appreciation of reality with the performance consequently. Slightly, the actual fact that I learn that my conversation partner believes “this” rather than “that” proportionally changes my attitude toward her. and a change in my attitude is a significant variation in me. We come into the conversation so that we can acquire, change, and develop, not so we can force transformation on the other, as individual despairs to do in debate a hope comprehended in inverse proportion to the frequency and ferocity with which debate is entered into. In addition, since in dialogue each partner comes with the intention of learning and fluctuating herself, one partner in fact will also amend. Therefore the goal of debate, plus greatly more, is accomplished far more effectively by dialogue.&nbsp.The fourth commandment further explains how in interreligious, inter-ideological dialogue we must not compare our ideals with our mates repetition, nevertheless somewhat our mate’s ideals with our partner’s ideals, and our drill with our partner’s practice. In The Faith Club, these two commandments&nbsp.manifested in the Faith Dialog between Suzanne, Rayna, and Pricilla when they were discussing their religious views from different perspectives.

Write a 5 pages paper on offensive-neorealism as the international political theory.

The offensive-neorealist approach is the only realistic approach in explaining international relations and the most appropriate International political theory.Offensive neorealism argues that states are principally concerned with maximizing their power in order to preempt any threat from other states. Mearsheimer offers a discussion on how states “care deeply about the balance of power and compete among themselves either to gain power…or make sure they do not lose power” (77).

As offensive realists argue, the structure of “competition for power” encourages states to maximize their share of world power. This maximization comes in terms of “pursuing hegemony which tends to intensify security competition” (77). This means that states are in a constant struggle to dominate other states since they ensure maximum security by maximizing this power. One of the strengths of offensive neorealism theory is that it has directed its focus on these differentials of power between states.

Offensive neorealism directs its main focus on the analysis of great powers arguing that great powers are the only ones capable of moving first in the international power struggle.Mearsheimer applies the offensive-neorealist approach to explaining the current situation at the international level where China is seen to be increasingly becoming a global power in its own right (88). He further argues that it makes good strategic sense for states such as China and the United States to gain much power and pursue hegemony.

According to offensive neorealists such as Mearsheimer, domination is the only way a state can gain overwhelming power in order to ensure its survival. Offensive neorealists are right to argue that in its rise, China will imitate the USA in its attempt to become a regional hegemon in Asia. In addition, China is likely to “push US military forces out of Asia….in the same way, the USA pushed European states out of the Western&nbsp.hemisphere” (Mearsheimer 89). In conclusion, Mearsheimer argues that such policy goals make good strategic sense.