“The Nature of Crime.” Please respond to the following: To reflect on . . . There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” ~ Ayn Rand “We do not condemn it because it is a crime, but it is a crime because we condemn it.” ~ Émile Durkheim Hello and welcome to Week 1! This week, as we reflect on what is the nature of crime, consider – how does a crime become a crime? Who decides? How do new crimes get created? And when culture and society change, how and when does a crime stop being a crime? As an example: Think about new crimes that exist today that our founding fathers never dreamed of, and then consider crimes that were crimes back then (like having an ice cream soda, or shopping, on Sunday) – but are no longer – or crimes that are on the books today, but maybe should be removed. For example, think of some things that are illegal today that were not 100 years ago – like being able to purchase over-the-counter morphine. Or 13-year-old girls being able to get married without parental consent. On the other side, has anyone heard of people being prosecuted for committing adultery recently? (Other than in the military. Wink ) It happened in NY just a few years ago in 2010: Woman Charged With Adultery to Challenge New York Law https://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/woman-charged-adultery-challenge-york-law/story?id=10857437 And then there are laws that perhaps go to far – at least 13 states require sex offender registration for public urination, according to Human Rights Watch’s comprehensive review of sex offender laws in 2007. So here is your challenge this week (this is what your post should be about): think about the key differences between criminal law and moral law, and how laws have changed over the last 200 or so years in the US. From the e-Activities: the Supplemental Resources, or other on-line research, here is where your research comes into play – provide one (1) specific example where the criminal law system legislated (or is legislating) conduct or morality. Discuss how or why that law was passed or is being considered for passage. In your reply responses to another student, consider Durkheim’s words, “We do not condemn it because it is a crime, but it is a crime because we condemn it.” Regarding the law your fellow student has presented, was it necessary or good for society at that point in time that the law was passed? Was it ever overturned? If not, should it be? Note: an exemplary score will include an original post of at least 150 words, with a well-written response to one or more other students. Full citations are not required in the discussions – the case name, book title or website link is sufficient.

/in /by

“The Nature of Crime.” Please respond to the following:

To reflect on . . .

  • There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”
    ~ Ayn Rand
  • “We do not condemn it because it is a crime, but it is a crime because we condemn it.”
    ~ Émile Durkheim

Hello and welcome to Week 1! This week, as we reflect on what is the nature of crime, consider – how does a crime become a crime? Who decides? How do new crimes get created? And when culture and society change, how and when does a crime stop being a crime? As an example:

  • Think about new crimes that exist today that our founding fathers never dreamed of, and then consider crimes that were crimes back then (like having an ice cream soda, or shopping, on Sunday) – but are no longer – or crimes that are on the books today, but maybe should be removed. For example, think of some things that are illegal today that were not 100 years ago – like being able to purchase over-the-counter morphine. Or 13-year-old girls being able to get married without parental consent.
  • On the other side, has anyone heard of people being prosecuted for committing adultery recently? (Other than in the military. Wink ) It happened in NY just a few years ago in 2010:
    Woman Charged With Adultery to Challenge New York Law
    https://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/woman-charged-adultery-challenge-york-law/story?id=10857437
  • And then there are laws that perhaps go to far – at least 13 states require sex offender registration for public urination, according to Human Rights Watch’s comprehensive review of sex offender laws in 2007.

So here is your challenge this week (this is what your post should be about): think about the key differences between criminal law and moral law, and how laws have changed over the last 200 or so years in the US. From the e-Activities: the Supplemental Resources, or other on-line research, here is where your research comes into play – provide one (1) specific example where the criminal law system legislated (or is legislating) conduct or morality. Discuss how or why that law was passed or is being considered for passage.

In your reply responses to another student, consider Durkheim’s words, “We do not condemn it because it is a crime, but it is a crime because we condemn it.” Regarding the law your fellow student has presented, was it necessary or good for society at that point in time that the law was passed? Was it ever overturned? If not, should it be?

  • Note: an exemplary score will include an original post of at least 150 words, with a well-written response to one or more other students. Full citations are not required in the discussions – the case name, book title or website link is sufficient.

people and organization management in the built environment

/in /by

I need some assistance with these assignment. people and organization management in the built environment Thank you in advance for the help! Change is indeed the one and only constant that exists within organizations. It is imperative to state that change is rampant because it makes things look easier from the long term perspectives. It makes the top management feel glad about their actions after the change philosophy has been defined, executed, and implemented to seek the best possible results for the sake of the organizations.

Within this paper, the focus would be kept on the built environment as change is witnessed at different levels so as to apprise all and sundry regarding the issues and concerns that the middle management and the lower staff have from time to time. It will also study the basis of change as a general proposition and then go on to find alternate routes in order to discern how change has been seen over the years in diverse industries and how it will be constantly viewed in the coming times as well. With that, a proper understanding of the change principles will be sought which shall tackle the nuances related to how people see change as a catalyst towards creating something big and gigantic within organizations. The role of the employees and the top management is also crucial towards forming such opinions and they will rightfully be given an opportunity to have their viewpoints expressed.&nbsp.

To begin the discussion at hand, it is quintessential to know where change can be incorporated within an organization. What this basically does is to tell the people at large how change is being seen and where its maximum uses and benefits can be drawn. It also tells the audience that change is the only element that shall remain constant at the best of times and must not be disallowed under any situation whatsoever. It only helps the processes become more focused and rationalized, allowing the people involved within it at different levels a greater mileage than ever before. However, not many businesses understand this principle as it should be (Berkowitz, 1993).&nbsp.&nbsp.

Compose a 1250 words assignment on the case of banjo jones and his blog.

/in /by

Compose a 1250 words assignment on the case of banjo jones and his blog. Needs to be plagiarism free! A second important fact of this case is that the writer of the web blog, Steve Olafson, was a journalist working for the Houston Chronicle. This is important because Mr. Olafson was a very talented writer that brought to the public very great information. He was able to provide powerful insights and opinions which other normal blogs lacked since many webmasters did not have the education and years of experienced Steve possessed. Many politicians, business owners and other publishing houses wanted to know the identity of Bango Jones. A third key fact of the case was that Mr. Olafson was fired by the Houston Chronicle for expressing his opinions on the internet. The newspaper violated Steve’s freedom of speech, which is very ironic since newspapers are in business because of freedom of speech protections.

A missing fact in this case is whether the claim that Steve used the blog to constantly attack politicians and institutions such as Dennis restaurant were true. The majority of the material of the website was column writing in which Steve’s prefer topics were stories about neighborhood kids, baseball and other sport coverage (Orlowski, 2002). Another important missing fact is the ultimate consequence of Steve actions. Did he ever serve jail time for his alleged bridge of confidentiality? The answer is no, Steve served jailed time around that time for an unrelated matter concerning protection of a source from the Eastern Post, a decision which was later overturned by the judge (Orlowski, 2002). A third missing fact is if Steve Olafson and the Houston Chronicles became enemies. They did not become enemies.

Compose a 2500 words assignment on the effects on depression using natural herbs.

/in /by

Compose a 2500 words assignment on the effects on depression using natural herbs. Needs to be plagiarism free!

The researchers measured the concentration of the follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol (E-2) and luteinizing hormone prior to and after administering the herbal formula to the women. After four months of treatment, the Depression Scale scores in both sets of samples declined substantially (p 0.05) with very minimal variation between them. However, the concentration of follicle-stimulating hormone declined significantly, triggering a commensurate rise in estradiol levels in both sets even as more changes were recorded among members of the control group.

The researchers registered no side-effect of administering the drug in either group in the course of the treatment. As such, they concluded that Chinese herbal medicine (GNL) is effective in controlling symptoms of Perimenopausal depression. They recommended more research on the topic, especially on expanding the use of the medicine among a wider segment of the population.Similarly, in a 2013 research, Arkowitz and Lilienfeld sought to investigate how therapies are disproportionately popular in the United States.

Their research was based on 2008 figures released by the National Center for Health Statistics, indicated that an estimated one-fifth of American people had consumed herbal medicinal formula between 2007 and 2008. They also cited the findings of Harvard Medical School establishing that the use of herbal medicine for the control of psychological and health problems had increased almost four times during the last decade of the 20th century. Arkowitz and Lilienfeld attributed the mad rush for the herbal formula to a) expensive prescription medicines. b) the increased risk of side effects of synthetic on a significant percentage of the population, and. c) and rejuvenated interest in natural, herbal cures.

In addition, many people mistakenly believe that natural stuff is generally safer than artificial medications. However, irrespective of the public&nbsp.psychological flaws, the researchers narrowed down their focus on the effectiveness of St. John’s wort in treating depression.&nbsp.