Evaluate well-established treatments for the diagnosis, and describe the likelihood of success or possible outcomes for each treatment.

/in /by

7 Full Well-Written Pages (Due 10/17/2018 NO LATER) ATTACHMENTS ADDED    NO PLAGIARISM.. 

For this assignment, students will investigate and propose a psychiatric diagnosis based on the case study from the Gorenstein and Comer (2015) textbook Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology, chosen in the Week One “Initial Call” discussion. This paper will include an in-depth overview of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, treatment options for the diagnosis, and a sound rationale that explains why this diagnosis was made. Note that the diagnosis may include more than one psychiatric disorder.

The paper must present a thorough overview of each disorder within the diagnosis. Assume the audience has no prior knowledge of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, and provide relevant and easy to understand explanations of each for the readers. When writing the paper, it is critical to convey all the necessary information in a straightforward manner using non-technical language. (Reference the Professional Voice and Writing (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. resource provided by the Ashford Writing Center for assistance.) Support the analysis with at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last ten years in addition to the course text.

The Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper must include the following:

  • Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation using professional terminology. Identify symptoms and behaviors exhibited by the patient in the chosen case study.
  • Match the identified symptoms to potential disorders in a diagnostic manual.
  • Propose a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms and the criteria listed for the disorder(s) in the diagnostic manual.
  • Analyze and explain how the patient meets criteria for the disorder(s) according to the patient’s symptoms and the criteria outlined in the diagnostic manual.
  • Justify the use of the chosen diagnostic manual (i.e., Why was this manual chosen over others?).
  • Summarize general views of the diagnosis from multiple theoretical orientations and historical perspectives. Include a discussion on comorbidity if the diagnosis includes more than one disorder.
  • Evaluate symptoms within the context of an appropriate theoretical orientation for this diagnosis.
  • Use at least two peer-reviewed articles to assess the validity of this diagnosis, and describe who is most likely to have the diagnosis with regard to age, gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. Provide a brief evaluation of the scientific merit of these peer-reviewed sources in the validity assessment.
  • Summarize the risk factors (i.e., biological, psychological, and/or social) for the diagnosis. If one of the categories is not relevant, address this within the summary.
  • Compare evidence-based and non-evidence-based treatment options for the diagnosis.
  • Evaluate well-established treatments for the diagnosis, and describe the likelihood of success or possible outcomes for each treatment.
  • Create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed references published within the last ten years to inform the diagnosis and treatment recommendations. In the annotated bibliography, write a two- to three-sentence evaluation of the scientific merit of each of these references. For additional assistance with this portion of the assignment, access the Ashford Writing Center’s Sample Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Must be 8 to 15 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last 10 years in addition to the course text.
  • Must include a separate annotated bibliography page.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart”

/in /by

Post 1

A wide-range of beliefs have been proposed throughout the centuries for what cognitions and behavior are  considered “normal” or “abnormal” with clear dividing lines as to why they subsist (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2016). Today, however, no true boundary line exists; rather, abnormality is viewed on a continuum with an assortment of issues considered to be underlying the symptoms (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2016). According to Nolen-Hoeksema (2016), the modern understanding of abnormality is shaped by an interaction between four factors consisting of a person’s thoughts, feelings and behaviors: dysfunction, distress, deviance, and dangerous. Dysfunction refers to the person’s inability to function or perform in daily routines. Distress refers to the deep concern or stress a person’s conduct has on him or herself and others (e.g., chronic lying, stealing, etc.). Deviance—influenced by cultural norms—refers to occurrences like hearing voices when alone. Finally, dangerous feelings and conduct refer to that which are potentially harmful to the person, such as suicidal ideations. Together, the “four Ds” constitute what the mental health field defines as “behavior or feelings [that are] abnormal or maladaptive” (Nolen-Hoeksema, 2016, p. 6).

Today, some mental health professionals today, like Basset and Baker (2015), believe a multi-disciplinary approach that takes into account culturally-accepted values for what is normal or abnormal leads to balanced considerations in the field, which I agree with to a point. Nevertheless, a Christian’s understanding for what is normal or abnormal in conduct or cognition should ultimately come from a biblical perspective. For example, fasting causes distress to the body and seems abnormal or counter-intuitive in today’s society, but it is a scriptural practice sanctioned by God in both the Old and New Testament (Matthew 6:16-18, Luke 4:2-4, Esther 4:16, Daniel 10:3). Another example is that today it is culturally acceptable to be sexually active outside marriage, yet the Bible clearly refers to adultery and fornication as deviant behaviors and sin (Exodus 20:14, 1 Corinthians 6:1-20). Jesus was notorious for going against the culturally accepted norms of His day (e.g., the treatment of foreigners or women). However, He also frequently added to a biblical command, “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart” (Matthew 5:27-28, English Standard Version, emphasis added). In John, Jesus highlighted another counter-cultural concept, “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another” (13:34, ESV, emphasis added). Therefore, our directives as Christians should ultimately come from the Word of God more than what is accepted as normal or abnormal by culture or science.

Finally, Jesus set a biblical standard how to care for a person that has behavior or cognitions that are defined biblically as dysfunctional, distressing, deviant, and/or dangerous. Primarily, He did not reject such people—even those caught in sinful acts—but  rather looked past the person’s actions to the heart of the matter (Proverbs 16:2, 1 Samuel 16:7, Hebrews 4:12). Therefore, to be most effective as Christian professionals in the mental health field, we must follow His example and learn how to best assist those exhibiting the “four Ds” (by any definition) with sincere love, compassion, and empathy. Although this is not always easy, it is a worthy directive to follow.

Post 2

Abnormality can denote a state where an individual behavior is contrary to the accepted norms of behavior, thought, or emotion (Zuern & Ashley, 2012). Norms can range from socially accepted norms to inability of a person to function adequately. In essence, from a biblical perspective, abnormality can be associated with anything that goes contrary to biblical teachings. For example, in Genesis 3: 1-13, upon temptation Adam and Eve chose to rebel. Their act of rebelling is an example of abnormal behavior. As such, the difference between normal and abnormal results from variations in thoughts, emotions, and behaviors (Nolen-Hoeksema’s, 2017). This means that Adam and Eve’s choice of rebelling is a display of abnormal behavior.

However, biblical conceptions of normal and abnormal behavior tend to differ from those in my culture. For instance, the act of rebelling may not be necessarily seen as an abnormal behavior but as a consequence of a stage such as adolescence or simply a reaction to an action. The underlying reason is that modern judgments of abnormality are influenced by the interplay of the four D’s: dysfunction, distress, deviance, and dangerousness (Nolen-Hoeksema’s, 2017).  In effect, amidst such a difference, biblical teachings can inform a person’s concept of what is considered normal, and this can be achieved by following the laid down rules such as the Ten Commandments.   Bottom of Form

Requirements for response back to post:

-Required word count 150 words

-Reply is thoughtful and demonstrates higher level thinking which adds value to the discussion

-Bible verse required is cited in text in correct APA format with no errors.

-Outside source required is cited in text and listed at the end of the post in correct APA format with no errors.

-Course textbook is cited, chp 1-2.(listed below and attached)

Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan (2016). Abnormal Psychology. (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Publishers. ISBN # 978-1-259-57813-7

Based upon your comparison, draw at least one conclusion about the psychology, characteristics, and behaviors of female and male offenders.

/in /by

The 2013 FBI Uniform Crime Report, Crime in the United States, 2012 (n.d.), indicates that females accounted for about 26.2% of arrestees for 2012. The mid-year 2010 Bureau of Justice Statistics (Minton, 2011) report also indicates that 12.3% of incarcerated offenders were female. While these numbers are rather small compared to male offenders’ rates, there has been a significant increase in these percentages in recent years. Some criminologists argue that accompanying this increase is a fundamental change in the nature and the extent of female offending, while others suggest that there is no fundamental change in female offending but, rather, a shift in society’s perception of particular crimes associated with female offenders. Vigorous prosecution of petty crimes, for example, may be at the root of the increase in numbers of female offenders in recent years. This leaves open the possibility that female offenders have, like males, been engaging in criminal behavior, but only recently held accountable at a comparable rate.

Although there is much debate on both sides of the argument about whether there is a significant difference in male and female criminal behavior, how society views gender roles certainly affects how female offenders are perceived. While there appears to be no definitive answer as to whether male and female offenders are significantly different, the question is far from moot, as the potential difference affects how crime prevention and treatment programs are crafted and whether differences that influence criminal behavior may be addressed.

For this Assignment review the article, “Understanding the Female Offender,” and consider the primary causes of female offending. Then, review the online summary, “Women and Girls in the Criminal Justice System,” focusing on the risk factors associated with criminal behavior of female offenders. Also consider how crime prevention and treatment may differ for male and female offenders.

Assignment (1–2 pages):

  • Briefly describe characteristics associated with female and male offenders.
  • Compare (similarities and differences) of female and male offenders.
  • Based upon your comparison, draw at least one conclusion about the psychology, characteristics, and behaviors of female and male offenders.

Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list only for those resources not included in the resources for this course.

Describe the prevention methods that you would implement if domestic violence is not occurring, although you suspect that it could be.

/in /by

Write about neurotransmitters in a 12 years old.it is accessible to a 12-year old (a middle school student). Envisage that the student is wondering about what is going on in his or her body in terms of love chemicals (friendship love, romantic love, passionate love). Leave out any age-inappropriate information.

Advice: When you complete the “Write for Children” assignment, remember that you are (in theory) writing for middle school children. These are young people about to enter puberty and the teen years (some may already have entered puberty). Try to recall when you were in middle school. Or if you were not in middle school (because you were home schooled or attended a school that went through eighth grade), try to remember what you were like back then. Then write to that person. What does that person want to know about love and the chemicals that are starting to run wild in their bodies? Speak their language. This is the one exception to “write at the college level.” In this assignment you should be writing as if you were writing a children’s book, or as if you were a biology or psychology teacher in middle school. Think like the kids.

You are conducting an initial family counseling session with the Robertsons. The family includes Dan Robertson (the father), Marie Robertson (the mother), and Peter Robinson (the 10-year-old son). The family has been referred to you for counseling. Dan is an alcoholic as well as a drug addict. His substance abuse has contributed to many family problems. You notice in the session that the only person talking is Dan. You also notice that when you encourage Peter and Marie to speak, they look at Dan prior to responding. Dan often interrupts and speaks for them.

Answer the following questions in 400-600 words:

  • Can you identify any possible signs of domestic violence from this initial session?
  • What subjective and objective measures would you take to identify whether domestic violence is occurring?
  • Describe the prevention methods that you would implement if domestic violence is not occurring, although you suspect that it could be.
  • Describe the interventions that you would implement if you confirm that domestic violence is occurring.

400-600 works