You must address 5  of the attached Dissertations in the prescribed format. As a related exercise, submit an annotated  bibliography of the 5 resources you referred to this week. For each dissertation entry, be sure to include the full APA citation and address the following :

Annotated Bibliography

As  part of your Doctoral Seminar for this set of weeks, you are     participating in a seminar-style discussion about the weekly topics. You must address 5  of the attached Dissertations in the prescribed format. As a related exercise, submit an annotated  bibliography of the 5 resources you referred to this week. For each dissertation entry, be sure to include the full APA citation and address the following :

1. Scope

2. Purpose

3. Philosophical Approach

4. Underlying Assumptions

5. Research

6. Limitations

7. Opportunities for further inquiry

8. Validity of use

General Topic: Sustainability and Community participation

Dissertation Resources:

Ananga, E. O. (2015). The role of community participation in water production and management: Lessons from sustainable aid in Africa international sponsored water schemes in Kisumu, Kenya (Order No. 3733847). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1737850915). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1737850915?accountid=14872

Arata, H. L. (2016). When public participation isn’t enough: Community resilience and the failure of colorblind environmental justice policies (Order No. 10191291). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1859517941). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1859517941?accountid=14872

Mazzurco, A. (2016). Methods to facilitate community participation in humanitarian engineering projects: Laying the foundation for a learning platform (Order No. 10172873). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1833187345). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1833187345?accountid=14872

Godana, G. D. (2014). The rhetoric of community participation: NGOs’ discourses and deliberative practices with communities in Ethiopia (Order No. 3666194). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1640889019). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1640889019?accountid=14872

Barclay, N. (2016). The role of community participation for green stormwater infrastructure development (Order No. 10152046). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1835116804). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1835116804?accountid=14872

  • attachment

Explain which particular free-format self-report measure (e.g., select from projective measures, associative lists,) you would prefer to administer if you were a researcher, and explain why. Would you prefer a different one if you were a participant in the study? Explain.

                                                      Assignment: Self-Report Measures

Self-report measures are widely used for data collection for psychological studies. There are two types of self-report measures: free-format and fixed-format. If you are designing a study involving math anxiety among freshman high school students, you could ask them to freely express their thoughts and feelings about math anxiety and you could record the responses exactly as given. Or, you could present students with a set of questions to measure their levels of math anxiety in which they select their answers from a given list of options. What could be the benefits and challenges in using each of these formats? You need to be able to answer such questions before you decide on a format for your study.

For this Assignment, you compare free-format and fixed-format self-report measures.

To prepare:

  • Review Chapter 4 from the course text.

Stangor, C. (2015). Research methods for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning

The Assignment (1 page):

Respond to the following:

  • Explain which particular free-format self-report measure (e.g., select from projective measures, associative lists,) you would prefer to administer if you were a researcher, and explain why. Would you prefer a different one if you were a participant in the study? Explain.
  • Explain which particular fixed-format self-report measure (e.g. Likert type scale, semantic differential) you would prefer to administer if you were a researcher, and explain why. Would you prefer a different one if you were a participant in the study? Explain.

Note: Support the responses within your Assignment with evidence from the assigned Learning Resources. Provide a reference list for resources you used for this Assignment.

: Write Section 3 of the DAA. Specify a research question related to gpa and final. Articulate the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis.Specify your alpha level.

See the Resources area for links to resources that you will use for this assignment:

You will complete this assignment using the Data Analysis and Application (DAA) Template.

Read the SPSS Data Analysis Report Guidelines for a more complete understanding of the DAA Template and how to format and organize your assignment.

Refer to IBM SPSS Step-By-Step Guide: Correlations for additional information on using SPSS for this assignment.

If necessary, review the Copy/Export Output Instructions to refresh your memory on how to perform these tasks. As with your previous two assignments, your submission should be in narrative format with supporting statistical output (table and graphs) integrated into the narrative in the appropriate places (not all at the end of the document).

You will analyze the following variables in the grades. sav data set: gender gpa total final

Step 1: Write Section 1 of the DAA. Provide the context of the grades. sav data set.

Include a definition of the specified variables and corresponding scales of measurement.Indicate the type of correlation for each XY pair (Pearson’s r, Spearman’s r, point-biserial r, et cetera).Specify the sample size of the data set.

Step 2: Write Section 2 of the DAA. Test the assumptions of correlation for gpa and final. Paste the SPSS histogram output for each variable and discuss your visual interpretations. Paste SPSS descriptive output showing skewness and kurtosis values and interpret them. Paste SPSS scatter plot output with “gpa” set to the horizontal axis and “final” set to the vertical axis. Conduct a visual inspection of the scatter plot to analyze other assumptions of correlation. Summarize whether or not the assumptions of correlation are met.

Step 3: Write Section 3 of the DAA. Specify a research question related to gpa and final. Articulate the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis.Specify your alpha level.

Step 4: Write Section 4 of the DAA. Paste the SPSS output of the intercorrelation matrix for all specified variables.

First, report the lowest magnitude correlation in the intercorrelation matrix, including degrees of freedom, correlation coefficient, p value, and effect size.

Interpret the effect size. Specify whether or not to reject the null hypothesis for this correlation. Second, report the highest magnitude correlation in the intercorrelation matrix, including degrees of freedom, correlation coefficient, p value, and effect size.

Interpret the effect size. Specify whether or not to reject the null hypothesis for this correlation.

Third, report the correlation between gpa and final, including degrees of freedom, correlation coefficient, p value, and effect size. Interpret the effect size. Analyze the correlation in terms of the null hypothesis.

Step 5: Write Section 5 of the DAA. Discuss the implications of this correlation as it relates to the research question. Conclude with an analysis of the strengths and limitations of correlational analysis.

Describe and recommend a course of action to avoid these areas.

Discussion Question 1

Beyond Informed Consent

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the Fisher (2009) article, “Replacing ‘Who is the Client?’ With a Different Ethical Question” and the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct: Including 2010 Amendments (Links to an external site.) paying special attention to standard 3.11.

Informed consent is an important ethical component of research and practice. It is not, however, always sufficient or appropriate for consulting, program evaluation, job effectiveness assessment, or other psychological services delivered to or through organizations because it does not always address all the necessary elements of a given situation. These facts do not negate our responsibility as psychology professionals to inform clients and those who may be impacted by our services. In the discussion you will address these issues through the following case study.

You are an industrial organizational (I/O) psychologist and have been hired to evaluate a company’s “Work From Home” policy to see if it has increased company production. In addition to a review of the employee records, the evaluation needs to include interviews with supervisors and employees on the value and limits of the policy. Since informed consent as typically considered in clinical, counseling, and research settings will not be sufficient in this instance, you will need to inform all supervisors and employees about your services.

In your initial post, briefly analyze and define who the client is in this case study. Assess your professional role as the I/O psychologist and your responsibility to the client as defined. Apply the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (Links to an external site.) to this scenario, specifically addressing what information should be provided to all supervisors and employees. Explain how you would disseminate this information and ensure understanding amongst all stakeholders. Elaborate on how you would establish trust with the employees, protect employee identities, and ensure the results are used in an ethical manner.

Discussion Question 2

Ethical Pitfalls for Psychology Professionals

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the Grenyer & Lewis (2012) “Prevalence, Prediction, and Prevention of Psychologist Misconduct” article and the APA Services’ Professional Health and Well-being for Psychologists (Links to an external site.)Tips from Practitioners on Finding Work-Life Balance (Links to an external site.), and Tips for Self-Care (Links to an external site.) online articles.

Select two complaints presented in the Grenyer & Lewis article (see Table 1) and explain the ramifications of these violations applying the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (Links to an external site.) to each situation. Assess the role of the APA in assisting psychology professionals in the identification of potential areas of misconduct. Describe and recommend a course of action to avoid these areas. Evaluate the contemporary role of psychology professionals and elaborate on the relationship between self-care and the issue of maintaining ethical principles and professional standards. Identify one or two self-care tips, tools, or suggested courses of action provided on the APA’s Self-care resources for psychologists (Links to an external site.) website that might address the issues which lead to the chosen complaints.