Review Paper next week, so be sure to incorporate the feedback you receive from your instructor on this assignment into your final paper for next week.

/in /by

I need this assignment by November 22 at 10pm 22:00 EDT

Evaluate the evidence. Create a draft of the findings of the articles you have selected and how they contribute to our knowledge of this problem. Be sure to address each of the following items in your draft:

1.  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each piece.
2.  If the articles talk to each other (that is, if they support or contrast with one another), explain how and why.
3.  What does the evidence tell us?
4.  Is there another possible explanation you can think of?  Based on what you have read, what is your hypothesis?  In other words, what is your explanation for the findings?
5.  How can you refine your question or topic even further, now that you have described the findings?

Your draft should be double-spaced and in 12 point, Times New Roman font with normal one-inch margins, written in APA style, and free of typographical and grammatical errors.  It should include a title page with a running head and a reference page. The body of the paper should be at least 5-6 pages in length. Submit your paper to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.

You will submit your Review Paper next week, so be sure to incorporate the feedback you receive from your instructor on this assignment into your final paper for next week. You may also want to review the following documents that are available in the area of the course:

  • A sample literature review,
  • a PowerPoint document illustrating how to set up your word processor for APA style
  • a “Guide for Writing a Literature Review”

If you have any questions about your paper, contact your instructor by posting in the Questions for the Professor or Problems & Solutions areas of the course.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Review Paper next week, so be sure to incorporate the feedback you receive from your instructor on this assignment into your final paper for next week. appeared first on Coursework Research.

Write a 750–word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that must be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper:

/in /by

Details:

Write a 750–word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that must be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper:

  1. A description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues
  2. Implications of each ethical issue
  3. Ways to avoid the ethical issues in psychological assessments
  4. A discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures
  5. A discussion of how a client’s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice

Include a discussion of how these ethical issues are addressed in “Section E: Evaluation, Assessment, and Interpretation” from the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics located at: http://www.counseling.org/Resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf.

Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the textbook in your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:

2.F.7.i. Use of assessments relevant to academic/educational, career, personal, and social development.

2.F.7.m. Ethical and culturally relevant strategies for selecting, administering, and interpreting assessment and test results.

RUBRIC 

10.0 %Ethical, Multicultural, and Diversity IssuesThe paper does not include a description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.10.0 %Implications of Each Ethical IssueThe paper does not discuss the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper inadequately discusses the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper appropriately discusses the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %How to Avoid Ethical Issues in Psychological AssessmentsThe paper does not include a discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Assessing Behaviors that Stem from Cultures or SubculturesThe paper does not include a discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Impacts of Assessment ChoiceThe paper does not include a discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Ethical Issues as Specified in the ACA Code of EthicsThe paper does not include a discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 3.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 2.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Write a 750–word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that must be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper: appeared first on Coursework Research.

Edu 645 week 6 assignment ( final project – curriculum based

/in /by

Curriculum Based Summative Assessment Design

Using what you’ve learned from Chapters Six and Eight from Lefrançois as well as other resources along the way, develop a curriculum based assessment (CBA) centered on one of your two instructional plans from Weeks Three and Four.

Part 1:  Provide a Pre-Assessment Description (One-to two-pages).
Use these prompts to guide your exploration of what occurred BEFORE the summative assessment.

  1. State measurable and observable objectives (what you wanted students to learn).
  2. Describe how you knew learning occurred prior to summative assessment.
  3. Describe the instructional strategies used to prepare students for the summative assessment (from your previous instructional plan in either Weeks Three or Four).
  4. Explain adjustments you made or should have made to your instruction to ensure mastery of learning objectives.
  5. Describe how the use of technology contributed to student preparation for the summative assessment or how it will be added to and contribute to the summative assessment here.

Part 2: Design an easily accessible summative assessment (Approximately two to three pages) 

  1. Identify the grade level and subject matter and a measurable unit objective(s) and align with the stated standard as prescribed in the original instructional plan from either Week Three or Four and referenced from the Common Core State Standards Initiative. 
  2. Create a minimum of six, no more than ten, problems/questions/tasks for students to complete that include a variety of test item types (selected response, short answer, extended written response, and/or performance).
  3. Label each question with its corresponding: 
  • Objective(s) (if more than one is being assessed)
  • Depth of Knowledge (DOK) levels (Note at least two different cognitive levels must be measured on this assessment.)
  • Define and discuss criteria for scoring extended response and performance items.

    • Part 3: Provide Assessment Reflection (One to two pages).

    1. Define how you determined mastery.
    2. Explain how you will accommodate or modify for the special population previously described in Week Four (two students with specific learning disabilities in reading and math, one ADHD student, and one English language learner).
    3. Describe how you will use the evidence collected. 

    Grading: You will submit a SINGLE document clearly labeled as Parts 1, 2, and 3. APA formatting will be followed, including the required cover and reference pages. You must use a minimum of five scholarly resources, in addition to the course text. Your resources should include a combination of peer-reviewed articles and web-based articles, and they must be cited in-text. You will be held accountable for each required subcomponent per part, viewable on the assignment rubric.

    Writing the Final Project
    The Summative Assessment:

    1. Must be approximately eight double-spaced pages in length, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    2. Must include a title page with the following:
      1. Title of paper
      2. Student’s name
      3. Course name and number
      4. Instructor’s name
      5. Date submitted
    3. Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
    4. Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
    5. Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
    6. Must use at least five scholarly sources, in addition to the course text.
    7. Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
    8. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

    Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

     

    DISCUSSION #3 PSY – Custom Nursing Help

    /in /by

    “Genetics versus Society” Please respond to the following:Give your opinion on whether you believe gender roles associated with each gender (i.e., the stereotypical ways that females and males are “supposed” to behave) are based more on biology or environment. Determine whether you believe the actions of females and males are based more on genetics or the expectations and dictates of society. Provide a rationale for your response
     
    Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.