Choose someone you know in your personal or professional life who has a profile on one of these three social networking services.

/in /by

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the required article by Appel and Kim-Appel (2010) and watch the Episode: 118 – Inside Out: An Introduction to Psychology – The Enduring Self video excerpt, which is accessible through the ProQuest database in the Library.

 

For this discussion, you will build on your experience in the “Personality Theory at Work in Popular Media” discussion from last week by re-examining the major theoretical approaches studied in the class (psychodynamic, behavioral, learning, trait and type, and humanistic) within the realm of social networks. In addition to these five domains, you will also consider the theoretical approaches related to complex models. Your initial post will be presented in a video format. Please see the instructions for this below.

 

To begin, choose a social networking site (this may be Facebook , LinkedIn or Twitter ). Choose someone you know in your personal or professional life who has a profile on one of these three social networking services. It is important in your posts and responses not to disclose identifying information about your subject. You may choose a pseudonym by which to identify your selected subject in this discussion.

 

Choose one of the five domains (psychodynamic, behavioral, learning, trait and type, and humanistic) and create a personality profile based on your current knowledge of your chosen subject using the framework of your selected domain. Then, review the online profile or feed of your subject in your chosen social networking site and create a personality profile based on the information your subject has published on the site using the framework of your selected domain.

 

Compare and contrast the two different personality profiles. Provide an analysis of any differences between the two profiles. Select one of the models with the complex models domain. Explain the reasoning for the differences between the real world and online personality of your subject using your selected model within the complex models domains. Research a minimum of two articles on your chosen model and use these to support your statements. Evaluate and describe the usefulness of complex models as they pertain to this exercise in personality theory.

 

You may create your initial post as a screencast video presentation or a video blog using the software of your choice. Quick-Start Guides are available for Prezi, Screencast-O-Matic, and YouTube for your convenience. Be sure to include all the required material from the instructions above in your presentation or video blog. Once you have created your video, please include the link in your initial post. In your initial post, please include citations for your references and a brief reflection on the differences between creating a written post and having to present the material via video.

 

 Identify rebuttals to counterarguments using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the rebuttals.

/in /by

Assessment Instructions

Preparation

For this assessment, you will choose one of the four following controversial topics from your Taking Sides text and write a position paper of 3–5 content pages (plus title and references pages) that answers the question posed by the title.

  • D’Angelo, R., & Douglas, H. (2017). Taking sides: Clashing views in race and ethnicity (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Available in the courseroom via the VitalSource Bookshelf link.
    • Do we need a common identity? (pages 19–37).
    • Is racial profiling defensible public policy? (pages 117–126).
    • Is the mass incarceration of Blacks and Latinos the new Jim Crow? (pages 222–235).
    • Is gentrification another form of segregation? (pages 236–246).

To further prepare you can choose to:

  • Review Issues Summary [DOCX] to help you select your topic.
  • Review Riverbend City: Arguments, Counterarguments, and Rebuttals. Your answers in the media piece will help you with this assessment.
  • Review the media piece about how to define what constitutes Reliable Evidence.
Instructions

Using the Capella library and other appropriate sources, explore scholarly research on both sides of your selected issue.

Develop your position on the question using the corresponding Taking Sides essay as a foundation.

Organize your paper as follows:

  • Title page.
  • Introduction.
  • Your position and arguments.
  • Evidence to support your arguments (i.e., data and research), including how the evidence supports the arguments.
  • Counterarguments to your position.
  • Rebuttals to those counterarguments.
  • Evidence to support your rebuttals (i.e., data and research), including how the evidence supports the rebuttals.
  • Summary and Conclusion.
  • References.

This APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] is provided for your convenience.

Additional Requirements
  • Remember that the content of your paper must be 3–5 pages in length.
  • In addition to the essay, use a minimum of 5 resources, at least 2 of which are peer-reviewed academic articles.
  • Follow APA style and formatting guidelines throughout.
  • Set your paper in Times New Roman, 12 point.
  • Review the scoring guide before submitting your assessment to ensure that you meet all criteria. Refer to the helpful links in Resources as you complete your assessment.

Consider saving this assessment to your ePortfolio.

Print

Controversial Topic Position Paper Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED Describe a controversial topic and key current issues related to the topic.Does not describe a controversial topic and key current issues related to the topic. Describes a controversial topic, but does not capture key current issues related to the topic. Describes a controversial topic and key current issues related to the topic.Analyzes a controversial topic and key current issues related to the topic. Describe own personal or professional position on a topic supported by psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity.Does not describe own personal or professional position on a topic supported by psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity.Describes own personal or professional position on a topic without support of psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity.Describes own personal or professional position on a topic supported by psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity.Describes own personal or professional position on a topic supported by psychological theories as well as research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity. Identify counterarguments to own position, using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the counterarguments.Does not identify counterarguments to own position, using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the counterarguments.Identifies counterarguments to own position, but does not use psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the counterarguments. Identifies counterarguments to own position, using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the counterarguments.Identifies counterarguments to own position, using psychological theories as well as research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the counterarguments. Identify rebuttals to counterarguments using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the rebuttals.Does not identify rebuttals to counterarguments using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the rebuttals.Identifies rebuttals to counterarguments but does not use psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the rebuttals.Identifies rebuttals to counterarguments using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the rebuttals.Identifies rebuttals to counterarguments using both psychological theories and research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support the rebuttals. Assess the strength of the original position using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support own views.Does not assess the strength of the original position using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support own views.Reasserts but does not assess the strength of the original position using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support own views.Assesses the strength of the original position using psychological theories or research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support own views.Assesses the strength of the original position using psychological theories and research in culture, ethnicity, and diversity to support own views Cite scholarly evidence correctly according to APA guidelines.Does not cite scholarly evidence correctly according to APA guidelines.Cites scholarly evidence with some errors in APA style and format.Cites scholarly evidence correctly according to APA guidelines.Cites scholarly evidence in APA style and format, without error. Write in a manner that is scholarly, clear, and free of grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors.Does not write in a manner that is scholarly, clear, and free of grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors. Writes in a manner that is inconsistently scholarly, clear, and free of grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors. Writes in a manner that is scholarly, clear, and free of grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors.Writes in an exemplary manner that is exceptionally scholarly, clear, and free of grammatical, spelling, and APA formatting errors.

Review the Learning Resources related to conformity and obedience and consider how they would apply to this Discussion.

/in /by

The intent of social psychology research has been and still is to explain how circumstances are more a power determinant of individual behavior than our own intuitions lead us to believe. Research on obedience and compliance is focused less on explaining why obedience can be a good thing—which it can—and more on explaining why people obey/comply with demands when they would likely prefer not to or when the demands compel them to do bad things (e.g., the classic Milgram and Stanford Prison studies).

Many are familiar with the experience of being tasked by someone in authority (e.g., a teacher, work supervisor, athletic coach) to do something of questionable value and which may be counterproductive. The demand itself appears to be arbitrary and may serve only to establish the authority of the person making it.

For this Discussion, you will share social conformity situations that you have experienced and apply social psychology theory to explain your actions in those situations.

To Prepare

  • Review the Learning Resources related to conformity and obedience and consider how they would apply to this Discussion.
  • Consider a time when you have experienced when compliance with a task was required, even when you believed that time could have been better spent doing something more productive. The task may have come from a teacher, supervisor, coach, or other authority figure.
  • If you complied with the order, reflect on why. If you did not, reflect on why you did not comply.

Post an example of a time when you complied with an authority person’s demand, despite thinking it was not a good use of your time. Please explain why you did. Then, give an example of a time when you refused to comply; explain why. Your post must be informed by social psychology theory and research.  Analyze effect of self-fulfilling prophecies on education, careers, and relationships

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the social psychology theory and research. In addition to the Learning Resources, search the Walden Library and/or Internet for peer-reviewed articles to support your post and responses. Use proper APA format and citations, including those in the Learning Resources.

Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions.

/in /by

Introduction
In this session, you have been considering moral-ethical dilemmas you yourself faced or that you know of that you either resolved or failed to resolve, but hopefully learned from. You may never have given much thought to ethical theory nor what ethical premises/paradigms you have unconsciously held.

You will be focusing on this case for this assignment:

Jane Doe is a nursing student at University X. Jane is in week eight of a course entitled: “Introduction to Ethics”.

For the week one discussion, Jane copied work done by her friend John Doe in the same class two months ago (with a different professor). John told Jane it was okay to use his work as John’s professor never checked any work in the class using Turnitin.com. John claimed to have earned an A on the work also.

In week two, Jane went to StudentPapering.com and paid ten dollars for a week two essay done by a student (not John Doe) who took the same course four months ago. StudentPapering promises that all its archived work is of excellent quality and cannot be detected as copied. Jane then uploaded an exact copy of the work for the week two assignment.

In week three, Jane paid a worker at PaperingStudent.com ten dollars to write for Jane a brand new essay after Jane shared with the worker the essay assignment instructions.

In week four, Jane relied on her knowledge of Esperanto. She felt pressed for time and found an article by a professor from Esperanto on the week four topic. She translated Esperanto into English using Moogle Translate, and the translated text served as her week four paper.

In week five, Jane was running late again. Jane purposely uploaded a blank paper hoping that she would later claim it was an innocent mistake and not be assessed a late penalty. In a previous course on History, she had done the same (with an earlier paper from the History class rather than simply a blank) and had not seen any late penalty assessed.

In week six, Jane took work she did in a nursing course from a year ago and submitted that for her discussion posting in her current class. She simply copied and pasted the work she had labored intensively on a year ago (even though University X forbids this practice as ‘self-plagiarism’). Jane was confident her Nursing instructor never checked that work using Turnitin.com or another method.

In week seven, Jane copied and pasted work found on website.com for the paper. Jane did not use any quotation marks or other documentation to show the text was not by Jane.

Since Jane’s Ethics professor did not check papers and posting for any issues by using Turnitin.com or another method, the professor graded all of Jane’s work unaware of Jane’s actions throughout the weeks of the class. Jane feels her actions are morally justified both because her economic situation requires her to work too much to devote time to school (although other students are well-off enough to have such time) and her religion forbids cheating, but Jane ignores her religion’s teachings.

Instructions
Now that you have had an opportunity to explore ethics formally, create a reflective assessment of your learning experience and the collaborations you engaged in throughout this session. You will submit both of the following:

  • A written reflection
  • An oral presentation using a PowerPoint narrated slide show.

For the written reflection, address Jane Doe’s and respond to the following:

  • Articulate again your moral theory from week eight discussion (You can revise it if you wish). What two ethical theories best apply to it? Why those two?
  • Apply to Jane Doe’s case your personal moral philosophy as developed in week eight discussion and now. Use it to determine if what Jane Doe did was ethical or unethical per your own moral philosophy.
  • Consider if some of these examples are more grave instances of ethical transgressions than others. Explain.
  • Propose a course of social action and a solution by using the ethics of egoism, utilitarianism, the “veil of ignorance” method, deontological principles, and/or a theory of justice to deal with students like  Jane. Consider social values such as those concerning ways of life while appraising the interests of diverse populations (for instance, those of differing religions and economic status).

For the oral presentation, briefly summarize your feelings about taking a course in Ethics and explore your process of transformation in this course.

  • Discuss your experiences of the course, your beginnings, and where you are now. Consider your interaction in discussions.
  • Should health care workers be required to take a course in Ethics? Why or why not