Choose 2 ethical issues in Consultation and 2 ethical issues in Supervision (in Neukrug textbook), and discuss each of them in the context of the relationship between counselor and consultant, and counselor and supervisor.

/in /by
 Topic: Issues in Professional Consultation and Supervision.
Three double spaced APA formatted pages are required (not including your title page and reference pages).
use textbook: The World of the Counselor by E. Neukrug (2016) 5th edition chapter 8 as well as the ACA Code of Ethics for this assignment.  No abstract is needed for this assignment but you must include an introductory paragraph and a summary paragraph.  Learning to write professionally involves parsimony, or using as few words to say what you want to say as possible.
Assignment will be submitted through safe assign so therefore please be careful with citing.
PLEASE BE SURE TO USE TEXTBOOK
The following are the things you must include in your paper:
1.   Define the role of consultation in professional counseling.  Define the role of supervision in professional counseling.
2.   Compare and contrast supervision and consultation – what are the differences as well as the similarities?
3.   Choose 2 ethical issues in Consultation and 2 ethical issues in Supervision (in Neukrug textbook), and discuss each of them in the context of the relationship between counselor and consultant, and counselor and supervisor.   Try to see yourself in these relationships in the future.
4.   How do you see technology influencing and impacting the supervision process and relationship?
5.  What are your thoughts about what you have read regarding the legal liabilities in consultation and supervision?  What concerns does this information stir in you?

Demonstrate an understanding of intelligence (IQ) and multiple  intelligences (MIs) by comparing and contrasting the differing variables  associated with each.

/in /by

Learner Needs: Multiple Intelligences

 

Prior to engaging in this discussion please read Chapter 7: Evolving Frameworks, in your e-book, watch the Theory of Multiple Intelligences (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. video, read the article “Multiple Intelligences” (2011), and review the Instructor Guidance.

Traditionally, someone who is intelligent is defined as an individual  who can solve problems, use logic to answer questions, and think  critically. However, psychologist Howard Gardner has created a much  broader definition of intelligence called multiple intelligences, which  is more focused on our areas of learning preferences. For this  discussion, please complete the following:

  • Demonstrate an understanding of intelligence (IQ) and multiple  intelligences (MIs) by comparing and contrasting the differing variables  associated with each.
  • Thinking critically about these foundational differences, comment on  how Gardner’s ideas about learning preferences might change the way we  assess a person’s strengths and weaknesses.
  • Click the following link and take the MI assessment (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Review your results.
    • Do you agree with the assessment? How can what you have learned about yourself help support your learning performance?  List at least two behaviors you could change or traits you could  develop in your own behaviors, and explain how they support your  assessment results.

Describe, in some detail, the stage of life according to the theory. (For example, in Erikson’s psychosocial development theory, a child who is four years old is in the stage of initiative versus guilt.)

/in /by

Apply developmental theory in a 4–5 page case notes document to explain how human behavior and thoughts affect mental health and well-being.

Psychology professionals, such as caseworkers and therapists, often think in terms of human development when assessing problems that individuals, couples, or families bring to them. A caseworker, therapist, or other psychology professional may take notes to document the situation and his or her interpretation and recommendations.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Apply foundational theories in psychology to current issues in the field of psychology.
    • Describe a life stage, based on a developmental theory.
    • Apply developmental theories to a case.
    • Summarize developmental theories.
  • Competency 3: Apply research findings from scholarly literature to current issues in the field of psychology.
    • Apply findings from scholarly research to a case.
  • Competency 4: Examine how human thoughts and behaviors can impact mental health and well-being.
    • Explain how a client’s thoughts and behaviors are impacting his or her well-being.
  • Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
    • Write coherently to support a central idea with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics, as expected of a psychology professional.
    • Use current APA format and style.

Instructions

Select a case from the Case Studies file in the Resources. Select two developmental theories that would apply to the concerns of the person in the case you selected. Search the library for at least two scholarly (peer-reviewed) articles that provide research that would support your analysis. Write comprehensive case notes for the case, based on your research.

Use the following section headings to organize your case notes:

Overview
  • Give a brief overview of the case in your own words. Explain how the client’s thoughts and behaviors are impacting his or her well-being.
  • Provide an overview of the two theories you have selected to apply to the case.
    • First Theory: Describe your first theory.
      • Describe the stage of life for you scenario, based on this theory.
      • Detail how your first theory helps explain your case.
    • Second Theory: Describe your second theory.
      • Describe the stage of life for you scenario, based on this theory.
      • Detail how your second theory helps explain your case.
Stage of Life
  • Describe the stage or stages of the theory that are most applicable to the person’s current stage of life.
    • Describe, in some detail, the stage of life according to the theory. (For example, in Erikson’s psychosocial development theory, a child who is four years old is in the stage of initiative versus guilt.)
  • Describe how the research from the articles applies to the person in the case you selected.
  • Apply your two theories to describe how they help us to better understand this particular person at this point in his or her life, based on how concerns are impacting his or her well-being.
Intervention or Recommendation
  • Recommend a research-based intervention.
  • Provide support from the scholarly literature for your assertion.
    • First Article: Describe the findings.
      • Describe how they apply to your case.
    • Second Article: Describe the findings.
      • Describe how they apply to your case.

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

  • Written Communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting.
  • References: At least 2 scholarly, peer-reviewed articles.
  • Length: 4–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the references page.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point, double-spaced.

Analyze how validity in psychometrics, as you explored in Unit 4, is different from a validity scale in a test of personality. Describe this difference in terms of their definitions. Provide at least two examples of validity scales.

/in /by

In this unit, you are introduced to personality tests and issues with their development and use. One particular area of debate involves the inclusion of validity scales in tests of personality. While many concerns may exist, the use of such scales appears to be increasing and they continue to be utilized and interpreted.

For this discussion:

  • Analyze how validity in psychometrics, as you explored in Unit 4, is different from a validity scale in a test of personality. Describe this difference in terms of their definitions. Provide at least two examples of validity scales.
  • Integrate and cite the AERA standards from Chapter 10, “Psychological Testing and Assessment,” of your Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing text that directly address validity scales. Provide your interpretation of the standards and the use of validity scales. Do the standards permit, reject, or provide guidance on integrating such scales in a report? In your own words, state how one should, or should not, proceed with validity scales.
  • Cite at least one advantage and one disadvantage regarding the use of validity scales. The test authors provide several pros and cons of using validity scales in personality assessment. Based on your readings, including preparation for this discussion, what is your position on this issue; that is, using and interpreting validity scales on a measure of personality?

When you post this discussion, change your subject line to Use, or Don’t Use.