assignment 1983 – Custom Nursing Help

/in /by

Answer Each Questions:
1. List and briefly describe the three major determinants of desired service levels.
2. List and briefly describe the five dimensions U.S. customers use to determine service quality.
3. List and briefly describe the four core dimension consumers use to evaluate Web sites.
4. List and briefly describe three sources of customer expectations that are market-controlled factors.
5. List and briefly the two types of future expectations research.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

write a response of at least one short paragraph per question respond to two other posts

/in /by

Write a response of at least one short paragraph per question. Respond to two other posts.

1. Why is it important to “plant a naysayer” in your text? How should you best address counter-arguments in your writing?

2. Why do you think it is important to answer the “so what?” and “who cares?” questions a reader might have? How does thinking about these questions help you as a writer to frame your work?

The text is called
They Say / I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing. It can be purchased here:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0393912752…

page 78-99

This is other student work I want you to respond one or two sentence

1) Planting a “naysayer” in the text shows that as an opinionated reader shows that you are ahead of what the reader is expecting. The reader reads with the intent of being persuaded by the opinion or insight of the writer but speaking about both the for and against your recurring argument answers the readers subconscious curiosity of what you have to say about the opposition. The best way to go about it in my opinion is to say how the exact opposite of the persuasion in the form of what critics and other academics would say. Then show how their opinions are not ideal.

2) It’s very important to answer the “so what” and “who cares?” because this shows the reader you are aware of the situations and views surrounding this topic. That is how you give it relevancy and actually appeal to both the right crowd of readers and at the right timing. Doing this also can give you purpose in your writing and then you are not writing just to be heard but to actually spark thought, engage the reader, and promote perspective. If the “who cares?” are answered well by the writer, the reader will start to believe that he does care.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post write a response of at least one short paragraph per question respond to two other posts appeared first on Essay Writers.

essay of rhetorical analysis

/in /by

Instructions for Essay 1: Rhetorical Analysis / Reader Response

You have already written two brief rhetorical analyses in this unit. For your major essay, you will write another rhetorical analysis, this time combined with a response or rebuttal.

Format: MLA paper format and documentation.

Sources: at least one source (the essay you are analyzing). Use of additional sources is encouraged but not required.

Length: Three pages, approx 800 – 1000 words

Due Date: Refer to the assignment calendar for this course.

First, read/view the texts that I have provided for you in the folder “Texts for Essay #1” located just below these instructions. Choose one of these texts to be the subject of your analysis and response. You will notice that there are a variety of texts to choose from, including videos and hybrid written/spoken multimedia texts.

Approach your rhetorical analysis much like you have with the previous assignments in this unit. Identify elements such as audience, purpose and context as a means of understanding how the text communicates its main idea (also known as a thesis). Also identify and provide examples of the types of appeals used by the author, pathos, logos, ethos, etc.

The new element for this assignment is that you will be responding to the main idea or thesis of the text that you are analyzing. In other words, once you have established what the text’s thesis is and how it communicates that thesis, you will then need to add your own voice, ideas and opinions to the mix. Think of it as joining a conversation. Do you think the author of the original text is mistaken? Has he/she failed to consider some important point? Or do you agree with the author? Perhaps you can provide additional reasons, examples and evidence to support the thesis. Sometimes you can both agree and disagree with the author, but if you do so, be sure to clearly identify which portions you agree with and which you disagree with.

An outline of your essay might look like this:

Introduction

Identify the text, the author and the subject matter. Make sure your reader knows what you will be talking about in your analysis.

Rhetorical analysis

Analyze the rhetorical situation (audience, purpose, context, visual or spatial elements, auditory elements, etc.) Explain how these elements, along with the author’s use of logos, pathos, and ethos are used to persuade or convince the audience and evaluate the effectiveness of these elements. This section might be several paragraphs long.

Response

Respond to the author’s thesis by agreeing/disagreeing. Add your own ideas opinions and examples.

Conclusion

Wrap up the essay by restating your conclusions and position on the topic.

There are three individual due dates associated with this essay. Look at the assignment calendar and you will see them listed as:

Essay 1 – Post Working Draft

Essay 1 – Compete Peer Review

Essay 1- Submit Final Drafts

For the due date associated with “Post Working Draft” you will post a complete draft of your essay to the appropriate forum in the Peer Review Board. How and where to do this are explained in the Guidelines for Peer Review, located near the end of Unit 2. By the second due date, Complete Peer Review, you will need to complete two reviews of drafts submitted by your classmates. Again, instructions for how to do this are located in the guidelines. After the peer review process is complete, you will submit your final draft on the date indicated as “Submit Final Draft.”

The final draft of your essay will be submitted via the link provided at the end of Unit 2

And link of artical is https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/20/opinion/no-way-…topic is no way to elect president

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post essay of rhetorical analysis appeared first on Essay Writers.

Clinical Field Experience C : Social Studies Mini-Lesson Plan

/in /by

Details:Allocate at least 4 hours in the field to support this field experience.Part 1: Mini-Lesson PlanPrior to going into your clinical field experience classroom this   week, use the data received from the pre-assessment to complete the   “Social Studies Mini-Lesson Plan” template. This   mini-lesson plan will be administered to the selected group of   students to support instruction to meet the selected standards. The   “Social Studies Mini-Lesson Plan” includes:Social Studies standard, arts standard, and grade levelLearning objective(s)Instructional Strategy100-150 word description of a learning activity that     successfully integrates social studies and the artsFormative assessmentPart 2: Mini-Lesson ImplementationAfter completing the “Social Studies Mini-Lesson Plan,”   share it with your mentor teacher for feedback. Provided permission,   teach the mini-lesson plan to the small group of selected students.   During your lesson, ensure you are answering questions from your   students, asking questions that support critical thinking and   problem-solving, and observing to see if each student understands the   content (this might require formative assessments before, during, and   after the lesson to determine understanding).Part 3: ReflectionIn 250-500 words, reflect on the process of using pre-assessment   data to develop a lesson plan, and on your experiences teaching the   lesson (if applicable).Include:How you used the data to develop the instruction, selected     strategies, and differentiation strategies to meet learning   needs.Other accommodations that would have supported the   learning.How integrating other content areas might engage   students.How this lesson could support short-term and     long-term instructional planning.How you will use your     findings in your future professional practice.Submit your reflection and “Social Studies Mini-Lesson   Plan” as one deliverable.APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning   the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Related