Do you feel that one argument makes a much stronger case than the other and why?

/in /by

Week 5 – Final Paper
Analyzing Reasoning on Both Sides
This final writing assignment allows you to present an analysis of the best reasoning on each side of your issue. In the process, you will get to demonstrate some of the key skills you have learned during this course. In particular, you will demonstrate the ability to create high-quality arguments on both sides of an issue, to support your reasoning with scholarly sources, and to provide a fair analysis of the strength of the reasoning on each side. For an example of how to complete this paper, take a look at the paper.
Your paper must include the following sections, clearly labeled:
· Introduction
o Introduce readers to your topic; include a brief preview of what you will accomplish in this paper. (approximately 150 words)
· First Argument
o Present the best argument on one side of the issue. (approximately 150 words)
§ Express your argument in standard form, with the premises listed one by one above the conclusion.
· Defense for First Argument 
o Support the first argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You may also choose to clarify the meaning of key premises and to explain how your reasoning supports the conclusion (approximately 250 words).
· Opposing Argument 
o Present the best argument on the other side of the issue (approximately 150 words).
§ Express your argument in standard form.
· Defense of Opposing Argument 
o Support the opposing argument as well as you can, using academic sources to demonstrate the truth of key premises. You are welcome as well to clarify the meaning of premises and/or to explain the reasoning further (approximately 250 words).
· Analysis of the Reasoning (approximately 350 words)
o Evaluate the quality of each argument, addressing whether key premises are true and whether the conclusion logically follows from them.
o Analyze arguments for any fallacies committed or for any biases that may influence either side. Do you feel that one argument makes a much stronger case than the other and why? (There is no need to “take sides,” only to assess the quality of the arguments.)
o Support your analysis with scholarly sources.
· Conclusion (approximately 150 words)
o Provide a brief conclusion and summary of your issue and how it can best be addressed by critical thinker.
The Analyzing Reasoning on Both Sides paper
· Must be 1,000 to 2,000 words in length (not including title and references pages), double-spaced, and formatted according to APA style as outlined.
· Must include a separate title page with the following:
o Title of paper
o Student’s name
o Course name and number
o Instructor’s name
o Date submitted
o
· Must use at least three scholarly sources in addition to the course text. The
o table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
o The tutorial will offer further assistance with including supporting information and reasoning.
· Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s
· Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style. See the resource in the Ashford Writing Center for specifications. Can also assist with searching for articles.

Crisis communication plan outline.

/in /by

The plan can be for an organization of your choice. This is an outline for a crisis communication plan and not a crisis plan. (You will use this outline to complete a plan in Unit VII.) The plan outline should, at a minimum, include the following items: The introduction should engage the reader in the crisis communication plan and clearly present a summary of the main points. Explain the purpose, scope and goal of the plan. Include assumptions or assumed situations, which is a result of assessing risk for your organization. De​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​fine expected audiences—both internal and external. Include a communication strategy. Include a concept of operations for communications. Discuss the human dynamics and communications aspects of the blame game and the resolution stages you plan to implement in your crisis communication plan. Assign tasks to key leaders and staff. Provide resource management details. Include planned scripts, which can be placed in an appendix. Research sources to link your plan’s elements to theories, and support your ideas. You must include a minimum of two sources, at least one source from the CSU Online Lib​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​rary.

Sample Solution

The post Crisis communication plan outline. appeared first on nursing writers.

The post Crisis communication plan outline. appeared first on nursing writers.

Qualitative & Quantitative- Research proposal

/in /by

In this outline (full paragraphs not required) you will decide on and develop details about two methods (qualitative and quantitative) that you will propose to use in your research proposal. To complete this assignment you will need to discuss these methods in depth.

In this assignment you will continue to develop the underlying ideas of your research proposal, with a focus on a detailed description of the data collection methods.

This assignment does not need to be in full paragraphs–bullet points are acceptable.

1. Summarize the topic of your research and your hypotheses or research questions. Explain why you think the hypothesis is true or what you think the answer to the question will be and why.

2. Describe what type of research methods you would use in the proposed research. [In this course, you already have this answer pre-selected for you in quantitative and qualitative methods, but you can be more specific regarding how this will be administered].

3. Justify this choice with quotations from Patten, Fink or another expert.

4. Explain in your own words WHY you have chosen these methods [yes, your professor forced you; but this is to discuss how each method will strengthen your research].

5. According to the book and class discussion what are some of the key choices you have to make concerning your use of the chosen methods?

6. At this point in your planning, what decisions have you made about those choices?

7. According to the book, what are some ethical issues that each of these methods raises?

8. How will you address these potential ethical issues in your design?

Attached are previous assignments related to this topic
View less

The Data Mining Best Practices paper

/in /by

In this assignment, you will analyze current data mining practices and evaluate the pros and cons of data mining. Provide one example of a company that has successfully practiced data mining and discuss why they were successful. Then, research a company that experienced a failed data mining practice. What data mining best practices could they have implemented to avoid this failure?

In your paper,

  • Discuss the industry standards for data mining best practices.
  • Identify pitfalls in data mining, including practices that should be avoided.
  • Provide an example of company that has successfully practiced data mining. What steps and precautions did they take to ensure the success of their data mining endeavor? How did they keep customer data safe?
  • In a second example, research a company that experienced a failed data mining experience. What pitfalls did the organization fall into? What would you have done differently?

The Data Mining Best Practices paper