Distinguish between Medicare and Medicaid as cutting reimbursements to hospitals with hospital-acquired conditions.

/in /by

Distinguish between Medicare and Medicaid as cutting reimbursements to hospitals with hospital-acquired conditions.

Medicare and Medicaid are cutting reimbursements to hospitals with hospital-acquired conditions. Need an article from a newspaper, magazine or professional journal.

Distinguish between Medicare and Medicaid as cutting reimbursements to hospitals with hospital-acquired conditions.
Medicare and Medicaid are cutting reimbursements to hospitals with hospital-acquired conditions. Need an article from a newspaper, magazine or professional journal.

 

smilesmile. .

get-your-custom-paper




The post Distinguish between Medicare and Medicaid as cutting reimbursements to hospitals with hospital-acquired conditions. appeared first on nursingessayswriters.com.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Distinguish between Medicare and Medicaid as cutting reimbursements to hospitals with hospital-acquired conditions. appeared first on Nursing Writers Hub.

global value chain considerations

/in /by

Introduction: To ensure you earn maximum points, your professionally written postings should provide substantive depth that demonstrates your proficiency to address topics and advance the Discussion at a graduate school level. Your postings should represent your own experience and the knowledge you have gained through learning, by communicating clearly through the written word. Correct use of grammar, spelling, descriptive explanations, and logical flow of thought are important in all assignments. (Note: Discussion responses are submitted to Turnitin to confirm originality and correct citation of references). Post a main response plus at least two additional conversational responses in the Discussion forum. There must be postings on or before Saturday and on three different days during the unit week.

Topic: Global Value Chain Considerations

The Discussion is designed for you to practice the decision-making process when considering globalization of a value chain.

Directions

  • Choose and describe a company operating solely in the United States that might be ready to expand globally. Explain what type of global expansion is being considered (your choice).
  • Assume you are the CEO and the ultimate decision-maker of this local company. You are confident your current value chain is solid but you are concerned at what the impact on your value chain might be if you expand to another country/other countries. What might need to be changed or modified in your company’s value chain prior to the expansion?
  • Examine how globalization could impact the current value chain. In the examination, include the following:
    • The response should use first person perspective.
    • Compose a response of at least four paragraphs of 4–5 sentences per paragraph. Apply no more than one APA formatted reference and citation per paragraph.
    • Support your response’s content with at least two applied and cited references from a Library article and also from your textbook. Apply and cite no more than one cited and referenced sentence per paragraph. Internet sources are not accepted for this Unit 4 Discussion. Use APA in-text citation within the response and list the applied reference(s) at the end of the response using APA formatting. APA formatting resources are available in the Academic Tools area titled, “APA Style Central.”
    • Proofread your response, run spell check and grammar check, and proofread again. Post your polished response in the Unit 4 Discussion.

     

    Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
    Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

    NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

    The post global value chain considerations appeared first on Essay Writers.

    reputation management

    /in /by

    please write your case study (i.e., summary) focusing on reputation management or issues management.  this assignment required 1,000 words minimum, and it’s due on Feb 25 at 10 AM.Look for a companythat needs itsreputation restoredbecause of performance or behavior or the loss of its intrinsic identity. (NOT a company that is experiencing a reputation crisis!) Then apply the principles and processes outlined in the reputation chapter — to rebuild the reputation.

     

    Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
    Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

    NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

    The post reputation management appeared first on Top Premier Essays.

    statistics/probability

    /in /by

    Jackson County judges try thousands of cases per year. In an overwhelming majority of the cases disposed, the verdict stands as rendered. However, some cases are appealed, and of those appealed, some of the cases are reversed. Jackie Chan of The Star Tribune conducted a study of cases handled by Jackson County judges over a three-year period. In the Excel file, Judges, linked at the bottom of the page, are the results for the 182,908 cases handled (disposed) by 40 judges in Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Court, and Municipal Court.

    The purpose of the newspaper’s study was to evaluate the performance of the judges. The newspaper wanted to know which judges were doing a good job and which ones were making too many mistakes. You are to assist in the data analysis by using your knowledge of probability and conditional probability to help with the ranking of each of the judges, as well as each court.

    Managerial Report
    Prepare a report (see below) with your ranking of the judges based on the probabilities and conditional probabilities, as well as the analysis of each court. Include the following seven (7) items in table format to support your ranking. Be sure to use five (5) decimal places for your probabilities in the table, as some of them will be quite small.

    The probability of cases being appealed in each of the three different courts.

    The probability of cases being reversed in each of the three different courts.

    The probability of cases being reversed given an appeal in each of the three different courts.

    The probability of a case being appealed for each judge.

    The probability of a case being reversed for each judge.

    The probability of reversal, given an appeal for each judge.

    Rank the judges within each court for each of the probabilities in 4 – 6. In other words, only rank the judges in the Common Pleas court against the other judges in the Common Pleas court. perfrom the same analysis for the other two courts. Then, within each court, find the sum of the ranks and get an overall ranking for each judge. Evaluate and discuss the meaning of your results. Use tables, charts, graphs, or visual dashboards to support your findings.

    Your report must contain the following:

    A title page in APA style.

    An introduction that summarizes the problem.

    The body of the paper should answer the questions posed in the problem by communicating the results of your analysis. Include results of calculations, as well as charts and graphs, where appropriate.

    A conclusion paragraph that addresses your findings and what you have determined from the data and your analysis.

    Submit your Excel file in addition to your report.

    Court Judge Disposed Appealed Reversed P(Appeal) Rank by P(A) P(Reversal) Rank by P(R) P(R|A) Rank by P(R|A) Sum of Ranks Overall Rank
    Common Pleas Peter Tom 3252 211 9                
      Angela M. Mazzarelli 4523 23 5                
      Richard T. Andrias 5231 61 8                
      David Friedman 3215 33 4                
      John W. Sweeny Jr. 3452 145 2                
      Rolando T. Acosta 3431 64 8                
      David B. Saxe 1236 46 3                
      Karla Moskowitz 3211 74 5                
      Dianne T. Renwick 1257 123 2                
      Leland G. DeGrasse 1537 53 7                
      Helen E. Freedman 1054 216 3                
      Rosalyn H. Richter 2176 36 22                
      Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 1567 43 31                
      Paul G. Feinman 2164 262 53                
      Judith J. Gische 2686 197 12                
      Darcel D. Clark 3953 175 25                
      Total                      
                             
    Domestic Relations John A. Lahtinen 8362 43 3                
      Leslie E. Stein 6572 21 6                
      William E. McCarthy 9321 8 3                
      Edward O. Spain 6244 34 5                
      Total                      
                             
    Municipal Elizabeth A. Garry 3542 31 6                
      John C. Egan Jr. 3285 23 34                
      Peter Tom 8757 38 7                
      Angela M. Mazzarelli 3463 7 3                
      Richard T. Andrias 7424 45 1                
      David Friedman 9345 32 3                
      John W. Sweeny Jr. 7533 84 5                
      Rolando T. Acosta 5764 43 7                
      David B. Saxe 5822 3 3                
      Karla Moskowitz 3631 7 5                
      Dianne T. Renwick 5645 5 0                
      Leland G. DeGrasse 6434 34 3                
      Helen E. Freedman 3453 8 2                
      Rosalyn H. Richter 3521 45 6                
      Sallie Manzanet-Daniels 6757 52 7                
      Paul G. Feinman 1273 4 3                
      Judith J. Gische 6753 9 1                
      Darcel D. Clark 9825 6 3                
      Luis A. Gonzalez 3421 12 2                
      Leslie E. Stein 2816 12 3                
      Total                      
                             
               

     

     

    “Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

    The post statistics/probability appeared first on Psychology Homework.