ボーイング 777-300ER 中国国際航空(エア・チャイナ) 特別塗装 「Smiling China」 B-2035 1/200 ※プラ製 2015年4月24日発売 hogan Wings/ホーガンウイングス飛行機/模型/完成品 [37777300A]：航空機模型Ｔｏｐ

/in /by

今すぐ購入

Hogan Wings 店頭受取対応商品

【飛行機】【旅客機】【模型】【hogan wings】【ボーイング】スナップモデル機体本体に主翼・尾翼・垂直尾翼・ギアをそれぞれ差し込む樹脂製タイプのモデルです。・ディスプレイスタンド付属※モデルサイズ全長: 約36.9cm全幅: 約30.5cm●参考実機サイズ (B777-300)全長: 73.86m全幅: 60.93m

おすすめ商品

￥24,750

￥17,960

￥11,970

￥10,730

￥9,560

￥10,940

関連製品

￥10,850￥25,520

￥19,360￥24,200

￥19,360￥24,200

￥52,800￥105,600

￥26,490￥35,320

￥10,800￥14,120

￥12,490￥14,700

￥11,020￥12,960

Final Paper

/in /by

This is a continuation of Order #124670 Body Draft. Please revise Instructor Comments – Order 124670.docx. 

 

Refer to also Final Paper Instructions.pdf, Sample Body Paragraph.pdf, and Outside Source of Depression.pdf to help you complete the final paper.

 

Writing Instructions

1. First, address my comments on the 600+ words that constitute the body of your paper. Please make sure that you pay special attention to any comments relating to citations and apply them throughout the paper. 

 

2. Add your introduction (Make sure you read the Final Instructions.pdf. I have very specific instructions for this introduction.)

 

3. Add a conclusion. (Make sure you read the Final Instructions.pdf.)

 

4. Add the works cited page using the guidelines in the Final Instructions.pdf.

 

5. Add a title and put everything in MLA format.

 

6. Read aloud, revise, read revise. Double-check your citations. Make sure your works cited page is there. Proofread.

 

Rubric

The “A” essay is exceptional. Assignment requirements are met and supported by a strong thesis. Body paragraphs begin with topic sentences that support the thesis. They provide logical reasoning and specific evidence to support the topic sentences thoroughly. They are well organized. Sentences are clear and use an appropriate tone. The paper begins with an interesting and useful introduction and ends with an interesting and useful conclusion. Errors are rare. If the essay is a research paper, citations are correct. For higher “A”s, the paper has something special in terms of originality, style, or voice.

eng215 persuasive paper 1

/in /by

Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists  
Due Week 5  

Using your thesis statement and research, present the problem that needs to be addressed with your proposed solution. Note: Your solution, advantages, and challenges, will be in Parts 2 and 3.

Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

  1. Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion). 
  2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (Revised from Assignment 2)
  3. Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
  4. Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
  5. Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.). and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
  6. Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
  7. Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution. 
  8. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
  9. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper.
  10. Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. 

Note: Submit your assignment to the designated plagiarism program so that you can make revisions before submitting your paper to your professor. 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement. 
  • Recognize the use of summary, paraphrasing, and quotation to communicate the main points of a text.
  • Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, logos in writing samples and for incorporation into essays or presentations.
  • Prepare a research project that supports an argument with structure and format appropriate to the genre.
  • Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
  • Incorporate relevant, properly documented sources to substantiate ideas.
  • Write clearly and concisely about selected topics using proper writing mechanics.  
  • Use technology and information resources to research selected issues for this course.

Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion).

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely provided an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience.

Insufficiently provided an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience.

Partially provided an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience.

Satisfactorily provided an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience.

Thoroughly provided an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience.

2. Included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (Revised from Assignment 2)
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph, revised from Assignment 2.

Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph, revised from Assignment 2.

 Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph, revised from Assignment 2.

Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph, revised from Assignment 2.

Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph, revised from Assignment 2.

3. Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Weight:5%

Did not submit or incompletely described, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the history and status of the issue paragraphs and did not submit or incompletely provided an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed.

Insufficiently described, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the history and status of the issue and insufficiently provided an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed.

Partially described, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the history and status of the issue and partially provided an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed..

Satisfactorily described, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the history and status of the issue and satisfactorily provided an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed.

Thoroughly described, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs the history and status of the issue and thoroughly provided an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed.

4. Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Weight:10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs,  the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and did not submit or incompletely provided support for your claims.

Insufficiently explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and insufficiently provided support for your claims.

Partially explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and partially provided support for your claims.

Satisfactorily explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and satisfactorily provided support for your claims.

Thoroughly explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and thoroughly provided support for your claims.

5. Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Weight:10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and did not submit or incompletely provided support for your claims.

Insufficiently explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and insufficiently provided support for your claims.

Partially explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and partially provided support for your claims.

Satisfactorily explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and satisfactorily provided support for your claims.

Thoroughly explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and thoroughly provided support for your claims.

6. Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Weight:10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and did not submit or incompletely provided support for your claims.

Insufficiently explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and insufficiently provided support for your claims.

Partially explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and partially provided support for your claims.

Satisfactorily explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and satisfactorily provided support for your claims.

Thoroughly explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and thoroughly provided support for your claims.

7. Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.

Weight:10%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.

Insufficiently provided a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.

Partially provided a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.

Satisfactorily provided a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.

Thoroughly provided a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution.

8. Develop a coherently structured paper with transitional words, phrases, and sentences. an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely

developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Insufficiently developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Partially developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Satisfactorily developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Thoroughly developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

9. Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references.

Weight: 10%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

10. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 25%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post eng215 persuasive paper 1 appeared first on Nursing Writers Hub.

Philosophy unit 4 IP

/in /by

For this paper, you will write a dialogue between you and an imaginary Socrates. You will debate the question of free will versus determinism. Remember that the Socratic Method involves asking a series of questions to clarify key words and ideas. In your dialogue, the imaginary Socrates should be asking clarifying questions, and you will be answering them. Please refer to the excerpt from Plato’s Meno as an example (below). This paper should be 4–6 pages.

Your dialogue should address the following questions:

  • What is the definition of determinism?
  • What is the definition of free will?
  • Do you agree that every event has an explanatory cause?
  • How do you define event?
  • How do you define explanatory cause?
  • Do you agree that every human choice or event has an explanatory cause?
  • How do you define human choice? How do you definite human event? Are they different?
  • Do you agree that to have an explanatory cause is to not be free?
  • How do you define free?
  • Do you think that free will and determinism can coexist in any way?
  • Is it possible to have external determinism and internal free will?

To have cohesion and reach solid conclusions, your imaginary Socrates will probably ask you more questions than the ones listed above. Be sure to include all of the above ideas in your dialogue.

Your dialogue should also include all of the following:

  • Use of the Socratic Method to form all conclusions (this will be achieved by the question and answer dialogue between you and the imaginary Socrates)
  • Clear and concise language, using proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation
  • Correct definitions of free will and determinism
  • Logical explanations and valid reasoning for each conclusion
  • Clear answers to each question with a definite stance or position
    • You must reach a conclusive answer to each question
  • 4–6 pages in length

The following is an excerpt from Plato’s Meno (Soccio, 1995):

 

Socrates: …Do not all men…desire the good?
Meno: I think not.
Socrates: There are some who desire evil?
Meno: Yes.
Socrates: Do you mean that they think the evils which they desire, to be good; or do they know that they are evil and yet desire them?
Meno: Both, I think.
Socrates: And do you really imagine, Meno, that a man knows evils to be evils and desires them notwithstanding?
Meno: Certainly I do.
Socrates: And desire is [for] possession?
Meno: Yes, [for] possession…
Socrates: Well, and do those who, as they say, desire evils, and think that evils are hurtful to the possessor of them, know that they will be hurt by them?
Meno: They must know it.
Socrates: And must they not suppose that those who are hurt are miserable in proportion to the hurt which is inflicted upon them?
Meno: How can it be otherwise?
Socrates: But are not the miserable ill-fated?
Meno: Yes, indeed.
Socrates: And does any one desire to be miserable and ill-fated?
Meno: I should say not, Socrates.
Socrates: But if there is no one who desires to be miserable, there is no one, Meno, who desires evil; for what is misery but the desire and possession of evil?
Meno: That appears to be the truth, Socrates, and I admit that nobody desires evil.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post Philosophy unit 4 IP appeared first on Psychology Homework.