for prof maurice only

/in /by

 

Unit Assignments

 

Unit IV Project

 

Perform a critical review of the following NIOSH Publication:

 

Cheung, Z., Feletto, M., Galante, J., & Waters, T. (2007). Ergonomic guidelines for manual material handling (DHHS [NIOSH] Publication No. 2007-131). Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2007-131/pdfs/2007-131.pdf

 

Click here to access a PDF of the NIOSH Publication No. 2007-131.

 

You must specifically summarize and analyze the following information in the indicated NIOSH publication:

 

ï‚· Engineering and administrative improvements

 

ï‚· Proactive action plan

 

ï‚· The three improvement options mentioned in the publication

 

 

 

However, you may also discuss any other topics you find interesting in publication.

 

The project must include, at minimum, the following components:

 

1. Introduction

 

2. Engineering and Administrative Improvements

 

3. Proactive Action Plan

 

4. Improvement Options

 

5. Summary of your own opinions and comments on what you learned from the publication.

 

 

 

Instructions

 

Your answer to this assignment must be three to five pages, double spaced, and 12 point font (separate title page and reference page are not included in the page length). CSU requires that students use APA style for papers and projects. Therefore, the APA rules for formatting, quoting, paraphrasing, citing, and listing of sources are to be followed. A document titled “Citation Guide” is available for you to download in the Learning Resources area of the myCSU Student Portal. It may also be accessed from the Student Resources link on the Course Menu of Blackboard.

 

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post for prof maurice only appeared first on Psychology Homework.

research methods 72

/in /by

Answer each of the questions below. Responses are usually about 100 words. After discussing the subfields you have read about and answering questions 1 and 2, read the abstract and give your impression of the value of this research, what does it say or not say about the type of research.

1. Consider the subfields of psychology and choose one that you did not know about or one that you believe has the greatest effect on society Name it and describe one field in detail.

2. Choose 2 research methods used in psychology and compare the 2 types of research including describing why one would be chosen over the other for particular research goals. Define the advantages and disadvantages of each.

3. Read the abstract and comment on it with what you believe is the values or lack of value to the research and what is the type of research used. Abstract Translate

Abstract

Anxiety affects school achievement, yet it is rarely targeted for intervention in students with emotional or behavioral disorders (EBD). This review of the literature summarizes existing research on (1) the prevalence of anxiety disorders in students with EBD, (2) the academic effects of anxiety disorders, and (3) the school interventions designed to ameliorate them. We offer conclusions regarding the state of educational intervention for these students. The review also highlights the scarcity of studies related to anxiety in students with EBD. Past research has focused primarily on students in general education settings, on prevalence within the general population, and on measuring psychosocial symptoms, rather than on academic achievement. We comment on the relevance of these findings to the field of EBD, and discuss implications for further research. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

—I attached the powerpoint notes related to this discussion to use as a reference.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post research methods 72 appeared first on Essay Writers.

2-3 pages with references please and no plagirazm

/in /by

The United States criminal justice system has a court system that is modulated in different parts. The Supreme Court is the highest authoritative court in the United States, and for cases to arrive at this court, they must pass through a variety of courts and have a legitimate consequence toward the nation.
You also have state, appellate, and local courts that serve jurisdictions where criminal cases are initially held and decided by a jury or a judge. It is vital to understand that certain crimes like fraud can be tried in the criminal sections of the criminal justice system, but there is also a civil justice system where parties seek civil relief for injustices that may or may not result from criminal activities. The civil courts, another set of courts, provide judgments over the civil cases. Judges decide if the plaintiffâ€s claim of harm by the defendant is justified.
Criminal cases are heard in criminal courts where, at the conclusion of the trial, the defendant may receive sentences of incarceration or fines as a result of being convicted at the criminal trial.
In a civil court, a person (plaintiff) pursues a civil action against another person (defendant), which may result from damages resulting from a criminal action of the defendant, an accidental action by the defendant, or a disagreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Please answer the following questions. As you answer each question, you must provide support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers. Academic criminal justice articles or real-life criminal justice findings that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in supporting your answers. Please use APA style for all cited sources, including your References page.

What is the dual-court system?
Why does America have a dual-court system?
Could the drive toward court unification eventually lead to a monolithic court system?
Would such a system be effective?

Judges have specific philosophical rationales and sentencing guidelines when providing a judgment over presented facts.

If you were a judge, what would be your sentencing goals and philosophical rationales? Why?
Can you envision any circumstances that might make your guidelines or sentencing goals change? Why?
Provide an example of a situation that might be extremely difficult to judge that could put you as a judge in a situation to change your sentencing goals or philosophical rationales.

 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post 2-3 pages with references please and no plagirazm appeared first on Psychology Homework.

2-3 pages with references please and no plagirazm

/in /by

The United States criminal justice system has a court system that is modulated in different parts. The Supreme Court is the highest authoritative court in the United States, and for cases to arrive at this court, they must pass through a variety of courts and have a legitimate consequence toward the nation.

You also have state, appellate, and local courts that serve jurisdictions where criminal cases are initially held and decided by a jury or a judge. It is vital to understand that certain crimes like fraud can be tried in the criminal sections of the criminal justice system, but there is also a civil justice system where parties seek civil relief for injustices that may or may not result from criminal activities. The civil courts, another set of courts, provide judgments over the civil cases. Judges decide if the plaintiff’s claim of harm by the defendant is justified.

Criminal cases are heard in criminal courts where, at the conclusion of the trial, the defendant may receive sentences of incarceration or fines as a result of being convicted at the criminal trial.

In a civil court, a person (plaintiff) pursues a civil action against another person (defendant), which may result from damages resulting from a criminal action of the defendant, an accidental action by the defendant, or a disagreement between the plaintiff and the defendant.

Please answer the following questions. As you answer each question, you must provide support or evidence that will enhance and empirically prove your answers. Academic criminal justice articles or real-life criminal justice findings that are not found in journals or other academic sources must be used in supporting your answers. Please use APA style for all cited sources, including your References page.

  • What is the dual-court system?
  • Why does America have a dual-court system?
  • Could the drive toward court unification eventually lead to a monolithic court system?
  • Would such a system be effective?

Judges have specific philosophical rationales and sentencing guidelines when providing a judgment over presented facts.

  • If you were a judge, what would be your sentencing goals and philosophical rationales? Why?
  • Can you envision any circumstances that might make your guidelines or sentencing goals change? Why?
  • Provide an example of a situation that might be extremely difficult to judge that could put you as a judge in a situation to change your sentencing goals or philosophical rationales.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post 2-3 pages with references please and no plagirazm appeared first on Psychology Homework.