Reading response to Serial , This is a reading response on Serial Episode 1-7, the link of the videos is https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/serial/id917918570?mt=2 (you need to play them on iTunes). There are two files one is the overall instruction for reading responses, the other one is particularly for the serial one, please read it carefully, use rhetorical analysis and quotes (cite appropriately). Please follow the instruction seriously. Reading Response 4 on Serial We are now halfway through the podcast Serial, and we have heard many different arguments using a range of rhetorical strategies. Your reading response 4 will focus on rhetorical analysis. As Lunsford, Ruszkiewicz, and Walters argue, to analyze a text rhetorically means to perform “a close reading of a text to find how and whether it persuades” (91). Chapter 3 of our textbook, Understanding Rhetoric, should be particularly helpful. Your goal is to write a response in which you assess the overall argumentative strategies of any one extended argument in Serial. You can choose a line of argument from any of the significant people in the case, such as Adnan or lay or Aisha or their friends or the police detectives or even the streaker from Leakin Park. Consider the following factors: 1) the use (or lack) of logical reasoning and adequate evidence in support of the main claims, 2) the rhetor’s (a rhetor is anyone who uses oral and / or written rhetoric) presentation of (or failure to present) themselves as credible and fair-minded as seen through the their tone and style and through a willingness to consider alternative points of view, and 3) the argument’s invocation (or failure to invoke) the audience’s emotions and values. * Again, like before, do not organize your response based on the itemized list above. The goal of the list is to help you brainstorm a strong response, but it is not meant to limit or organize your thoughts. You should respond holistically based on what works best for your own line of thought. Details: Base your analysis / assessment on specific examples from the texts Use a mixture of quotation and paraphrase Make sure you indicate who you are quoting or paraphrasing in the body of your sentence To cite your direct quotes and paraphrases, list the Episode name and minute in parentheses, like this . . . end of the quote” (“Leakin Park” 17:59) Aim for a ratio of 2:1, two sentences of analysis for every one sentence of quotation or paraphrase Like your other reading responses, use MLA format and word count – custom papers

/in /by

Reading response to Serial
,
This is a reading response on Serial Episode 1-7, the link of the videos is https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/serial/id917918570?mt=2 (you need to play them on iTunes). There are two files one is the overall instruction for reading responses, the other one is particularly for the serial one, please read it carefully, use rhetorical analysis and quotes (cite appropriately). Please follow the instruction seriously.
Reading Response 4 on Serial
We are now halfway through the podcast Serial, and we have heard many different
arguments using a range of rhetorical strategies. Your reading response 4 will focus on
rhetorical analysis. As Lunsford, Ruszkiewicz, and Walters argue, to analyze a text
rhetorically means to perform “a close reading of a text to find how and whether it
persuades” (91). Chapter 3 of our textbook, Understanding Rhetoric, should be particularly
helpful.
Your goal is to write a response in which you assess the overall argumentative strategies of
any one extended argument in Serial. You can choose a line of argument from any of the
significant people in the case, such as Adnan or lay or Aisha or their friends or the police
detectives or even the streaker from Leakin Park.
Consider the following factors: 1) the use (or lack) of logical reasoning and adequate
evidence in support of the main claims, 2) the rhetor’s (a rhetor is anyone who uses oral
and / or written rhetoric) presentation of (or failure to present) themselves as credible and
fair-minded as seen through the their tone and style and through a willingness to consider
alternative points of view, and 3) the argument’s invocation (or failure to invoke) the
audience’s emotions and values. * Again, like before, do not organize your response based
on the itemized list above. The goal of the list is to help you brainstorm a strong response,
but it is not meant to limit or organize your thoughts. You should respond holistically based
on what works best for your own line of thought.
Details:
Base your analysis / assessment on specific examples from the texts
Use a mixture of quotation and paraphrase
Make sure you indicate who you are quoting or paraphrasing in the body of your
sentence
To cite your direct quotes and paraphrases, list the Episode name and minute in
parentheses, like this . . . end of the quote” (“Leakin Park” 17:59)
Aim for a ratio of 2:1, two sentences of analysis for every one sentence of quotation
or paraphrase
Like your other reading responses, use MLA format and word count

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Reading response to Serial , This is a reading response on Serial Episode 1-7, the link of the videos is https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/serial/id917918570?mt=2 (you need to play them on iTunes). There are two files one is the overall instruction for reading responses, the other one is particularly for the serial one, please read it carefully, use rhetorical analysis and quotes (cite appropriately). Please follow the instruction seriously. Reading Response 4 on Serial We are now halfway through the podcast Serial, and we have heard many different arguments using a range of rhetorical strategies. Your reading response 4 will focus on rhetorical analysis. As Lunsford, Ruszkiewicz, and Walters argue, to analyze a text rhetorically means to perform “a close reading of a text to find how and whether it persuades” (91). Chapter 3 of our textbook, Understanding Rhetoric, should be particularly helpful. Your goal is to write a response in which you assess the overall argumentative strategies of any one extended argument in Serial. You can choose a line of argument from any of the significant people in the case, such as Adnan or lay or Aisha or their friends or the police detectives or even the streaker from Leakin Park. Consider the following factors: 1) the use (or lack) of logical reasoning and adequate evidence in support of the main claims, 2) the rhetor’s (a rhetor is anyone who uses oral and / or written rhetoric) presentation of (or failure to present) themselves as credible and fair-minded as seen through the their tone and style and through a willingness to consider alternative points of view, and 3) the argument’s invocation (or failure to invoke) the audience’s emotions and values. * Again, like before, do not organize your response based on the itemized list above. The goal of the list is to help you brainstorm a strong response, but it is not meant to limit or organize your thoughts. You should respond holistically based on what works best for your own line of thought. Details: Base your analysis / assessment on specific examples from the texts Use a mixture of quotation and paraphrase Make sure you indicate who you are quoting or paraphrasing in the body of your sentence To cite your direct quotes and paraphrases, list the Episode name and minute in parentheses, like this . . . end of the quote” (“Leakin Park” 17:59) Aim for a ratio of 2:1, two sentences of analysis for every one sentence of quotation or paraphrase Like your other reading responses, use MLA format and word count – custom papers appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

week 5.1 NR 532

/in /by

  1. This paper will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and organization based on the required components.
  2. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”
  3. Submit to the appropriate assignment area by 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday of the week due. Any questions about this paper may be discussed in the weekly Q & A Discussion topic.
  4. The length of the paper is to be approximately three pages, excluding the title page and reference list.
  5. APA format (6th edition) is required in this assignment, including a title page and reference page. Use APA level 1 headings for the organizational structure of this assignment. Remember that the introduction does not carry a heading that labels it as a level heading in APA format. The first part of your paper is assumed to be the introduction. See APA manual for details. See resource under the course Library Guide, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers.” Use the suggested format and headings to organize your assignment.
    1. Include introduction (do not label as a heading in APA format)
    2. Steps Related to Legal/Regulatory Issue
    3. State-Board Recovery Program
    4. Strategies
    5. Supporting Evidence
    6. Conclusion

Preparing the paper

As the nurse executive of a healthcare organization, it was reported to you that one of your nurses may be chemically impaired (legal/regulatory issue) and has allegedly been taking drugs from the unit. This nurse also had two recent medication errors in the past week. Discuss the steps you would take to validate this allegation and how you would proceed after the allegation was confirmed to be true.

  1. Clearly introduce your legal/regulatory issue in the introduction paragraph; including a sentence that states the purpose of your paper.
  2. Clearly articulate the steps you would take as the nurse leader to investigate the allegation of this legal/regulatory issue as stated above and how to proceed when the allegation is confirmed to be true.
  3. Investigate/research and discuss if your state board of nursing offers some type of recovery program for chemically-impaired nurses (a strategy). If they do not offer a program in your state, discuss a proposed recovery program for chemically-impaired nurses that you would like to have implemented for your state.

Contact a state representative who may have an interest in this topic area and share their comments on this issue in an addendum (not included as part of the three page limit). Include your correspondence eg. Emails in your addendum, as well. This will demonstrate you contacted a state representative, in the event you do not receive a response.

4. Clearly articulate your specific strategies to improve costs and improve the quality of healthcare at your organization related to the legal/regulatory issue stated above. How do your strategies relate to the Person-Centred Nursing Leadership Framework by McCormack and McCance (2017); specifically the contextual domain?

5. Include of a minimum of three sources of scholarly, empirical evidence that supports your strategies to improve costs and quality of healthcare.

6. Provide concluding statements that should summarize your overall assignment content.

7. The paper should be no longer than three pages, excluding title and reference page(s).

8. Title and reference page(s) must be in APA format (6th edition).

9. Use 12 Times New Roman font and one-inch margins on all sides of the paper.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post week 5.1 NR 532 appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

Family history project part 1

/in /by

 

Refer to the Family History Project Instructions and complete Part 1.
Note: When submitting the genogram to the instructor, make sure the genogram is in a PDF format. The system will not accept the Genogram file. If this is not an option, take a screen shot of the genogram and paste it into a Word document to submit to the instructor.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

This assignment meets the following NASAC Standards:

95) Understand the characteristics and dynamics of families, couples, and intimate dyads affected by addiction.

98) Help members of the family, couple, or intimate dyed understand the interaction between their system and addiction.

104) Describe how addiction affects families and significant/concerned others.

ps please follow the attachment

Cultural Differences as Barriers to Success

/in /by

Please ONLY use 3 or more internet sources (NOT JOURNALS) as references for this briefing. The paper needs to be formatted as follows:

Introduction

Analysis

Summary

References

The Merger & Acquisition team hired a team of external consultants to assist with identification of cultural issues which could result in barriers to the successful acquisition of Island Banking Services by Padgett-Beale. The consultants conducted interviews with Padgett-Beale executives and senior staff. They also used a standardized survey to measure attitudes and beliefs about culture and conflict management styles at Padgett-Beale. A survey of islanders was conducted as well. The results from both surveys have not yet been validated but, the early results show substantial similarities to existing national culture survey results for U.S. populations and residents of Fiji. You can learn more about the national culture surveys here: https://www.hofstede-insights.com/models/national-culture/ and here https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/fiji,the-usa/

An additional survey was conducted among Padgett-Beale managers who will transfer to PBI-FS and island residents who have applied for jobs at PBI-FS. This survey focused primarily on the influence of context upon inter-cultural communications. This survey found that Padgett-Beale’s corporate communications culture was “low context” while the job applicants expected a “high context” culture. For definitions and examples see http://www.culture-at-work.com/highlow.html

After reviewing the consultants’ reports, the M&A team has decided to focus on differences in two factors which could present immediate barriers to success: (a) communications context and (b) power-distance.

Cultural Dimension    Padgett Beale Managers & Employees    PBI-FS Job Applicants (Islanders)
Communications Context    Low Context    High Context
Power-Distance    Medium Power Distance    High Power Distance
To answer questions and allay concerns, you’ve been asked to prepare a briefing about these factors to be given at the next senior leadership meeting. For that briefing you must research and answer the following questions:

1. What is “communications context” and how could it influence expectations of managers and employees and their relationships with each other at PBI-FS?

2. What is “power-distance” and how could it influence expectations of managers and employees and their relationships with each other at PBI-FS?

3. How might differences in communications context (low/high) and power-distance contribute to conflicts within the new organization (PBI-FS), e.g. between transferred PBI personnel and newly hired islanders?

4. What best practices should managers and executives follow when conflicts arise between the company (Padgett-Beale) and its new subsidiary (PBI-FS)?

Organize your talking points around the four sets of questions. Then write your responses as a 7 paragraph briefing paper (you may use some bullet points but the majority of the content should be organized as paragraphs). This paper will be sent to the VP’s and other senior leaders to read prior to the senior leadership meeting.