Strategic recommendations 510-12 | Operations Management homework help

/in /by

 

Managing the multi-business corporation to meet high performance expectations is problematic. Publicly traded companies are pressured to return favorable quarterly results and as corporations grow larger and more complex, it becomes harder to manage such corporations effectively. General Electric (GE) was once one of the most admired corporations in the world. Today, GE is facing a much-reduced outlook. For this week’s assignment, read the case study found in your textbook (Case 20): Restructuring General Electric.

Remember, a case study is a puzzle to be solved, so before reading and answering the specific case and study questions, develop your proposed solution by following these five steps:

  1. Read the case study to identify the key issues and underlying issues. These issues are the principles and concepts of the course area which apply to the situation described in the case study.
  2. Record the facts from the case study which are relevant to the principles and concepts of the course area issues. The case may have extraneous information not relevant to the current course area. Your ability to differentiate between relevant and irrelevant information is an important aspect of case analysis, as it will inform the focus of your answers.
  3. Describe in some detail the actions that would address or correct the situation.
  4. Consider how you would support your solution with examples from experience or current real-life examples or cases from textbooks.
  5. Complete this initial analysis and then read the discussion questions. Typically, you will already have the answers to the questions but with a broader consideration. At this point, you can add the details and/or analytical tools required to solve the case.

Case Study Questions:

  1. Why was GE considered to be such an exemplary organization? (Discuss GE’s management systems and performance.)
  2. Discuss the nature of GE’s corporate portfolio under Welch and Imelt. Did the nature of GE’s portfolio under Welch and Imelt provide superior results?
  3. If GE’s portfolio mix gave superior results, why was it necessary to restructure the portfolio?
  4. Why is GE’s performance no longer superior? What are the reasons for the collapse in GE’s financial performance during 2016-2018?
  5. What should be done to return GE to higher levels of performance? Does GE need to refocus? Which businesses or products would you recommend abandoning or divesting, if any? Does GE need to make additional acquisitions to supplement existing GE assets?

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Be 8 pages in length, which does not include the title page or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
  • Use APA style guidelines.
  • Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more.
  • 100 % free plagiarism 

Anti-intellectualism in American Life

/in /by

I have just a couple of quick notes regarding this. First, the introduction should be a complete introductionat least one full paragraph and probably about two-thirds of a page to one full page.
The outline should be as detailed as possible so that I can understand the reasoning for your ideas as well as their structure.

See attached

The post Anti-intellectualism in American Life appeared first on nursing writers.

ap outline peer review

/in /by

This is my partner’s essay;

– The problem: The segregation of families that lie within a minority background remains at a high in the early 2000s due to the lack of enforcement by the law.

– The solution(s): The suggestion of having areas of preventing ghettoization and resegregation and certain other policy approaches are included.

– Thesis: The Mt. Laurel plan from New Jersey, although several states have a similar plan to this, supported by the Harvard Civil Rights Project, is the best policy to have because it made it easier for developers to sue and win in cases of zoning regulations, shows the need for tenant outreach and counseling, as well as having integration goals in these highly segregated suburbias.

– 1st Body Paragraph:

– Framework: Coverage

– Topic Sentence: The Mt. Laurel plan, if can be adopted throughout many areas of segregation, can have most areas “required” to have an even distribution of low and moderate housing based on the assessment of the whole state.

– 2nd Body Paragraph:

– Framework: Causation

– Topic Sentence: if this policy is set in motion, we can see the areas where the need for tenant outreach and counseling must be pushed harder in certain areas than others.

– Opposition:

– This policy can have a disadvantage is a participating municipality might require extra zoning to produce housing and that the policy can be pushed to be seen as judicial activism.

– This policy should still be accepted because is seems like the most ideal way to regulate red-lining and create fair housing opportunities because it forces an even distribution of both low and moderate income families in a single neighborhood.

– Framework: cost/benefit and feasibility

– Questions:

– Should my AP be focused on only one policy and discuss 3 of the 5 frameworks on that one policy? ~or~

– Should it be about 2-3 policies and compare frameworks for all the policies (not including the opposition）

Here are the instructions:

Use your partner’s three questions to drive your responses, and address the following as you go:

Step 1: Read your partner’s three questions. Then, with these in mind, read the outline all the way through. Engage with the text earnestly so that you can respond as an active representative of the generous, genuine audience for your peer’s work.

Step 2: Respond to the following prompts:

  • Describe the problem you see your peer author focusing on. What rhetorical strategies does the author use to make the problem feel urgent and important?
  • Identify the solution statement(s) in your peer’s paper.
  • Of the five argument criteria (causality, coverage, cost/benefit, feasibility, comparison), which ones have your partner chosen to focus on?
  • Do the sources seem to support the argument criteria?
  • Think about organization. Do your partner’s criteria seem interchangeable (in other words, could you move them into a different order without changing much)? Or do they seem contingent on each other (or in other words, do they build into what looks like it will be a cohesive argument)?
  • At this stage, how do you think the the solution be implemented, according to your peer author? What are the costs of the solution (monetary and non-monetary)?
  • Is it clear to you that the solution’s benefits will outweigh the costs?
  • How does the author know the solution will work? (Does (s)he describe analogous contexts wherein a similar solution has worked? Does (s)he link the solution to the root causes of the problem? Does (s)he discuss the coverage area of the solution, and is it sufficiently large to make a difference to the problem? Does (s)he describe the metrics for success (how we will know that the solution is working)? Does (s)he compare his/her solution to other possible solutions and explain why that solution is better than the others?
  • How does your author address counterarguments? Do(es) the counterargument(s) seem realistic, earnest, and plausible? Is the opposition well-represented? Does the author effectively “deal” with the counterarguments presented by acknowledging, rebutting, or resolving the concerns?)

<a href="https://canvas.eee.uci.edu/courses/17092/modules/items/502443" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Advocacy Project Outline ” aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>

Step 3: Address your partner’s three specific questions.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post ap outline peer review appeared first on Essay Writers.