delirium in nursing

/in /by

You must access the following article to answer the questions:

Baker, N., Taggart, H., Nivens, A. & Tillman, P. (2015). Delirium: Why are nurses confused? MedSurg Nursing, 24(1), 15-22.

  • Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from one of the study/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.
  • Discuss how the author’s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.
  • Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.

Discussion Board Rubric 9_19
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswers the initial graded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.
16.0 pts

Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.

 14.0 pts

Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.

 12.0 pts

Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.

 0.0 pts

Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).

16.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited. ( APA format not required)
12.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support your discussion from: assigned readings OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source. Sources are credited.

 10.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support discussion from: assigned readings OR online lesson. Sources are credited.

 9.0 pts

Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.

 0.0 pts

Does not integrate any evidence.

12.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEngages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.
14.0 pts

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

 12.0 pts

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

 10.0 pts

Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.

 0.0 pts

No response post to another student or instructor.

14.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicates in a professional manner.
8.0 pts

Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

 7.0 pts

Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

 6.0 pts

Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

 0.0 pts

Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

8.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePARTICIPATION: Response to initial question:Responds to initial discussion question(s) by
Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
0.0 pts

0 points deducted

Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

 0.0 pts

5 points deducted

Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

0.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePARTICIPATION Total posts:Participates in the discussion at least three times on at least two different days.
0.0 pts

0 points deducted

Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.

 0.0 pts

5 points deducted

Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.

0.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post delirium in nursing appeared first on Essay Writers.

assignment conflict

/in /by

Conflict is everywhere and it is impossible to avoid conflicting viewpoints. However, not all conflict is bad, nor is it inherently negative. How conflict is handled makes all the difference. It is through proper identification and understanding of the conflict that allows for effective resolutions, some of which may yield positive outcomes. The purpose of this assignment is to examine the different types of conflict, how to understand and embrace the positive aspects of the conflict, and how to successfully navigate conflict to positive resolution.

To complete this assignment:

  • Select and complete one conflict resolution assessment tool from the list provided above or search online for a free conflict resolution assessment of your choice.
  • Based on the results, write a 2 to 3-page reflection paper, summarizing your approach to conflicts, show whether you agree or disagree with the results, and finally provide a past conflict example demonstrating how you used the particular conflict resolution method/approach indicated in the assessment results.
  • Be sure to provide a link to the source of your conflict resolution assessment tool in the reference section of your paper.
  • Your Assignment must be written in standard edited English per the APA guidelines.
  • Be sure to support your work with at least two high-quality references, including at least one from peer-reviewed journals accessed through the Herzing University Library or other sources.
  • Your Assignment should show an effective application of triangulation of content and resources in your conclusion and recommendations.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post assignment conflict appeared first on Quality Nursing Writers.

Evaluate the case, and respond to each question that follows the case using both theory and practical managerial thinking – custom papers

/in /by

Southwest Airlines, beginning on page 412 of the course textbook
Your APA formatted Case Study should be a minimum of 500 words (not including the title and references pages). You are required to use a minimum of three peer-reviewed, academic sources that are no more than five years old (one of which may be your textbook). All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations.
Course eTextbook
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2012). Marketing management [VitalSource Bookshelf version] (14th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781323291016

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Evaluate the case, and respond to each question that follows the case using both theory and practical managerial thinking – custom papers appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

supply chain management walmart – Essay Writers

/in /by

(a) Explain the operating environment of the organisation. In your opinion, identify one
(1) uncertainty that can potentially cause severe disruptions in its the supply chain
processes. Name the organisation that you have selected and include examples and/or
figures, if applicable, to justify your views.
(Your write-up for this part should not exceed 1,000 words.)

-Name & Background of organization: → e.g The organization we have chosen is Walmart
-Operating environment:
-One uncertainty identified: —>key word: cause severe disruptions in its supply chain processes & justify your views with examples, figures
Guideline –>‘Uncertainty may take the form of high variability in demand, process or supply, which in turn creates problems in planning, scheduling and control.’ (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/043f/02d995bfc37425b0b898e37920ee31477bd8.pdf)
-The potential disruptions: → keyword: justify your views with examples, figures
guideline–>
category: Disruption
Risk Drivers: Natural Disaster, war, terrorism, labor disputes, supplier bankruptcy

-Conclusion
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.