Health Care Reform

/in /by

A synthesis essay is all about combinations and connections between your ideas and your source material. While writing this type of essay, you can remain focused on many different factors and ideas at once with the use of an annotated bibliography. Synthesis essays typically require the writer to incorporate many different types of reading and writing skills: critical reading, reading response, analysis, and argumentation.
Actually, analysis of a topic is a key point in the entire synthesis essay writing process. You need to develop a research question that is not too narrow nor too broad. You must use the information that you gathered during your research to make an inference. You make an inference by building connections and comparisons among your source material. Your inference (or thesis) should be a logical conclusion based on the source material you put together during your research.
While theyre different types of synthesis, I want an argumentative synthesis essay. You should be attempting to prove your main claim is correct through using various effective persuasive methods. Argumentative synthesis essay writing involves using facts, statistics, in-text citations, quotes, and other techniques used to support a specific view/claim.
A synthesis essay is all about combinations and connections between your ideas and your source material. In other words, its a written conversation/discourse of the source material you have compiled on your topic. This paper MUST go beyond a mere summarizing of source material. You have to make decisions and assessments of your source material. Below are the requirements of this particular assignment:
Your paper must have a title which is indicative of the topic. Examples:
o Women, Born and Bound: The Perils of Female Passing in a Patriarchal Society
o Resourceful Rage: Janes Quest for Independence in Charlotte Bronts Jane Eyre
o For He Contained Within Him a Largeness Of Spirit: The Duality of Billys Spirit, The
Hope for Humanity in Cormac McCarthys Border Trilogy
You MUST have a thesis statement.
You MUST have a counter-argument.
Your paper should integrate 5 works of scholarly criticism (journal articles, books, and book chapters) to provide support for your reading of the issue.
Your paper must be 1800-2000 words and be accompanied by a Works Cited page.

In ms word. p 7-41

/in /by

Grande Stores is a large discount catalog department store chain. The company has recently expanded from 6 to 43 stores by borrowing from several large financial institutions and from a public offering of common stock. A recent investigation has disclosed that Grande materially overstated net income. Theis was accomplished by understating accounts payable and recording fictitious supplier credits that further reduced accounts payable. An SEC investigation was critical of the evidence gathered by Grande’s audit firm, Montgomery & Ross, in testing accounts payable and the supplier credits.
The following is a description of some of the fictitious supplier credits and unrecorded amounts in accounts payable, as well as the audit procedures.
1. Neo: too much
2. typing. I’m sure
3. you have a copy
4. of 1 thru 4.
Required:
Identify deficiencies in the sufficiency and appropriateness of the evidence gathered in the audit of accounts payable of Grande Stores.

Mobility vcbc post work | Nursing homework help

/in /by

 

205/225 Concept Notebook Rubric
205/225 Concept Notebook RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelated Concept

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 2 concepts, related to the client with a detailed explanation of each related concept and how the related concept is impacted by the main concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented at least 1 concept, 1 concept is related to the client, or only minimal explanation of each related concept and how the related concept is impacted by the main concept, or incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no related concept, did not relate the concept to the client, no explanation of each related concept and how the related concept is impacted by the main concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExemplar

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 3 Exemplars, related to the client and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented 1-2 Exemplars, 1-2 concepts are related to the client, or incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no Exemplars , did not relate the concept to the client and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssessment

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 3 assessments used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and are all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each assessment and why one would do that assessment relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented 1-2 assessments used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of why one would do that assessment relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no assessments used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of why one would do that assessment relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLab & Diagnostic

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 3 lab or diagnostic test used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each lab/test and why one would do that lab/test relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented 1-2 lab or diagnostic test used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept, 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of each lab/test and why one would do that lab/test relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no lab or diagnostic test used to find and rule out alterations with the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of each lab/test and why one would do that lab/test relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterventions

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 3 nursing interventions needed to care for clients with alterations to the main concept and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each intervention and why one would perform the interventions relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented 1-2 nursing interventions needed to care for clients with alterations to the main concept, 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of each intervention and why one would perform the interventions relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no nursing interventions needed to care for clients with alterations to the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of each intervention and why one would perform the interventions relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMedications

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 3 medications administered to clients to treat or prevent alterations to the main concept and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each medication and why one would administer the medication relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented 1-2medications administered to clients to treat or prevent alterations to the main concept, 1-2 relate to the client, minimal explanation of each medication and why one would administer the medication relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no medications administered to clients to treat or prevent alterations to the main concept and did not relate to the client, no explanation of each medication and why one would administer the medication relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePotential Complications

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 2 potential problems that could occur if alterations to the main concept are not addressed/treated and all related to the client, a detailed explanation of each complication and how it could occur relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented 1 potential problem that could occur if alterations to the main concept are not addressed/treated, 1 concept is related to the client, minimal explanation of each complication and how it could occur relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no potential problems that could occur if alterations to the main concept are not addressed/treated, did not relate the concept to the client, no explanation of each complication and how it could occur relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollaborative Care

1 ptsSatisfactory
Documented at least 1 department/ancillary staff that may be needed to treat clients who have or are at risk for alterations with the main concept and is related to the client, a detailed explanation of each how that department/ancillary staff could assist the client relating to the concept, and correct APA in-text citations (if used).
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Documented at least 1 department/ancillary staff that may be needed to treat clients who have or are at risk for alterations with the main concept and is related to the client, minimal explanation of each how that department/ancillary staff could assist the client relating to the concept, and incorrect APA in-text citations (if used).
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
Documented no department/ancillary staff that may be needed to treat clients who have or are at risk for alterations with the main concept, did not relate the concept to the client, no explanation of each how that department/ancillary staff could assist the client relating to the concept, and no APA in-text citations (if used).1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling and Grammar

1 ptsSatisfactory
0- 2 mistakes in spelling or grammar.
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
3 -4 mistakes in spelling or grammar.
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
5 or more mistakes in spelling or grammar.1 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesCorrect APA references.

1 ptsSatisfactory
Correct APA references.
0.5 ptsNeeds Improvement
Incorrect APA references.
0 ptsUnsatisfactory
No APA references.1 pts
Total Points: 10

PreviousNext

Kotters 8-Step Change Model Chart

/in /by

Using the Organizational Change Chart, outline information about the experience and organization following Kotters 8-Step to Change Model as a guiding line.

Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model
    Step One: Create Urgency.
    Step Two: Form a Powerful Coalition.
    Step Three: Create a Vision for Change.
    Step Four: Communicate the Vision.
    Step Five: Remove Obstacles.
    Step Six: Create Short-Term Wins.
    Step Seven: Build on the Change.
    Step Eight: Anchor the Changes in Corporate Culture.

The post Kotters 8-Step Change Model Chart appeared first on nursing writers.