LCO_Presentation

/in /by

At residency, you will present your book review in a MS PowerPoint or Prezi presentation.  You are expected to provide an overview (similar to an abstract) of your book.

You should include the following information:

  • The title and a brief introduction of your selected leadership book (similar to an abstract)
  • Background information on the author(s)
  • A description of the major theme of the book
  • An explanation as to your interest in selecting this particular book for your leadership book review
  • Describe the main theories and principles (at least five) presented in the book
  • How each of the theories and principals presented in the book directly relate to being a leader
  • Show how the theories and principals presented in the book relate to specific leadership standards
  • Explain how each of the theories and principles presented in the book directly relate to your development as a leader
  • Closing comments to summarize the theories and principals presented in the book
  • Your critique of the book as it relates to developing leaders
  • How could the information you gained through reviewing this book on leadership enhance your knowledge base and development as a leader
  • Why or why would you recommend this book to your fellow class members

Organization of the Presentation:

  • Concise in presentation
  • Sections are clearly identified
  • Include an agenda slide
  • 10-12 slides
  • Approximately 15 minutes in length
  • No grammar, spelling, punctuation, or typing errors
  • Speaker notes must be included on all slides

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post LCO_Presentation appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

Discussion: assessing musculoskeletal pain | Nursing homework help

/in /by

  

Discussion: Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain

The body is constantly sending signals about its health. One of the most easily recognized signals is pain. Musculoskeletal conditions comprise one of the leading causes of severe long-term pain in patients. The musculoskeletal system is an elaborate system of interconnected levers that provides the body with support and mobility. Because of the interconnectedness of the musculoskeletal system, identifying the causes of pain can be challenging. Accurately interpreting the cause of musculoskeletal pain requires an assessment process informed by patient history and physical exams.

In this Discussion, you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting.

                                           To prepare:

· By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to one of the following specific case studies for this Discussion. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

· Your Discussion post should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style Discussion posting format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP notes have specific data included in every patient case.

                                      Case : Ankle Pain

A 46-year-old female reports pain in both of her ankles, but she is more concerned about her right ankle. She was playing soccer over the weekend and heard a “pop.” She is able to bear weight, but it is uncomfortable. In determining the cause of the ankle pain, based on your knowledge of anatomy, 

· what foot structures are likely involved? 

· What other symptoms need to be explored? What are your differential diagnoses for ankle pain? 

· What physical examination will you perform? What special maneuvers will you perform? Should you apply the Ottawa ankle rules to determine if you need additional testing?

With regard to the case study you were assigned:

· Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.

· Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study you were assigned.

· Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?

· Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

Post an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. 

Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. 

List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each. 

staffing for crime control quot please respond to the following

/in /by

Read the article titled “Staffing the ‘Small’ Department: Taking Stock of Existing Benchmarks and Promising Approaches”, located here. You may also view the article here. Next, give your opinion as to which of the five (5) typical approaches to staffing discussed in the article is the most efficient in general. Justify your response.
Imagine that you are the executive officer of a newly established police precinct. Determine two (2) possible approaches that you could utilize to estimate the staffing for investigation responsibilities. Support your response.

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

doscussion response

/in /by

R. G
1 posts
Re: Topic 2 DQ 2

To provide a balance between respect for persons, potential benefits and burdens of the research, and justice, proper adherence to research guidelines and regulations should be performed. In 1976, a conference was held by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research at the Smithsonians Belmont Conference Center. This was the start of the development of the Belmont Report that emphasizes the fundamental principles of research along with the Nuremberg Code of 1947 and the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 (Tappen, 2016). Another way to balance principles, the study must be approved by a hospital based institutional review board (IRB) and before it is approved, the IRB may ask for it to be revised and can even be rejected. IRBs vary across research and healthcare institutions therefore requirements vary. Some commonly requested information for IRBs to request in their applications include conflicts of interest, investigational drugs, environmental concerns, participant safety, and data monitoring (Tappen, 2016).

To balance respect for persons in my study It would be helpful to use various modalities for participant education and informed consent in addition to offering all material in the participant’s language of choice (Tappen, 2016). Providing various forms of the educational material about the study prior to the official informed consent helps improve comprehension to ensure participants are positioned to optimally understand the components of the study and informed consent (Lindsley, 2019). While providing educational material and answering any participant questions I would also deliver the information in a simple, objective, thorough, and truthful manner (Tappen, 2016).

To balance justice within the study, I would create clear inclusion and exclusion criteria for participants based upon the objectives of the study (The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979).

To balance the benefits and burdens of research, I would first do as much research as I could to determine the consequences or potential risks/harms of research on participants through evaluating previous studies and other factual resources (The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 1979). Study design would then attempt to minimize the known risks to participants. I would also obtain IRB approval to ensure the study benefits justify the potential risks from an unbiased perspective (Tappen, 2016).

References:

Lindsley, K. A. (2019). Improving quality of the informed consent process: Developing an easy-to-read, multimodal, patient-centered format in a real-world setting. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(5), 944951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.022

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/

Tappen, R. M. (2016). Advanced nursing research from theory to practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

The post doscussion response appeared first on nursing writers.