Gandhi with social justice – custom papers

Topic: Gandhi with social justiceOrder DescriptionResearch a topic of interest related to Gandhi and his ideas. The paper should be 4 pages (excluding cover and reference pages).. The paper should include at least three references. It should be typed and double-spaced.I want you to write about Gandhi with social justice. Specifically talking about the cast system (Untouchability) including a little bit of religion. You could use any reliable sources from book or articles. Also, at the conclusion please provide an opinion or point of view.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

discussion 1 ethical dilemmas the trolley problem in theory and in the real world

View the following videos.

  • Trolley Car Dilemma – Harvard’s Michael Sandel (14:59) (Links to an external site.) – In this video, Havard professor Micahel Sandel discusses the classic Trolley Dilemma and its various versions to an ethics class. As you view the video reflect on the scenario presented to you in module overview.
  • The Trolley Problem and Ethics of Driver-less Cars (5:07) (Links to an external site.) – While the various Trolley Dilemmmas represent hypothetical (and thus somewhat unrealistic) situations, this video depicts a modern, real-world example of the application of the same kinds of dilemmas and decisions.

After watching the videos, post a thoughtful critique addressing the following questions:

  1. How would you respond to each of the variants of the Trolley Problem described below? Be thorough and justify your reasoning. Note: You cannot add any elements to change the situation – i.e., you cannot rush in and untie the people from the tract, etc. You must make the choice between only the options given. For each scenario, think about whether or not the answers to the following two questions differ: What is the right thing to do and What would you do? In each of these cases 1-4 the result will be the death of 1 person and saving the lives of 5 people.
    1. Original problem – you are the trolley driver; decision is to pull switch or not.
    2. Fat man variant – you are an observer on a bridge; decision is to push fat man or not.
    3. Fat man/villain variant – you are an observer on a bridge; decision is to push fat man or not; fat man is the villain who put the five people in danger on the tracks.
    4. Loved one variant – you are the trolley driver; decision is to pull the switch or not; the 1 person that would die if you pull the switch is a dear loved one of yours (parent, child, spouse, etc.)
    5. Man sleeping in his yard variant – you can divert trolley’s path by colliding another trolley into it, but if you do, both will be derailed and go down a hill, and into a yard where a man is sleeping in a hammock. He would be killed.
  2. What if instead of killing 1 person to save 5, your action would result in killing 4 people to save 5? Would you change your behavior in any of the situations? Why or why not?
  3. Transplant variant – This version addresses some of the same core issues as the Trolley Problem but with the following scenario: A brilliant transplant surgeon has five patients, each in need of a different organ, each of whom will die without that organ. Unfortunately, there are no organs available to perform any of these five transplant operations. A healthy young traveler, just passing through the city the doctor works in, comes in for a routine checkup. In the course of doing the checkup, the doctor discovers that his organs are compatible with all five of his dying patients. Suppose that if the young man were to disappear, no one would suspect the doctor. Should the doctor to kill that tourist and provide his healthy organs to those five dying persons to ave their lives? How is this the scenario the same and how does it differ from the Trolley Problem?

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post discussion 1 ethical dilemmas the trolley problem in theory and in the real world appeared first on Essay Writers.

Need Help With This Assignment Must Be Original With All Requested Information ALSO DQ QUESTION IS ATTACHED

Assignment 3: RA Working Ahead

Case Scenario:

You work for a large corporate business. One of the managers at the company receives an anonymous e-mail message claiming that a certain employee, Bob, has been acting strangely and muttering threats to get even with others. The manager calls the police, who, after obtaining Bob’s permission, search his car and workstation but find no evidence of any weapons. Bob denies ever making any sort of threat and says he was just having a bad day.

The manager asks you to conduct a threat assessment on Bob. The manager says that the company has the right to conduct a threat assessment, but Bob is liable to sue if he is fired as a consequence of your findings, so the threat assessment has to stand up to scrutiny in court. In addition, Bob must be determined by you to have “fully cooperated” with the assessment in order to avoid termination. Therefore, you can expect him to participate in any form of assessment you choose even though he may lie or misrepresent his answers. If you state Bob lied during the assessment, he will be fired. This, too, must stand up to scrutiny in court.

You review Bob’s personnel record. He has been late to work several times and has even come to work drunk. He missed one week of work three years ago while jailed on a drunk and disorderly charge. He took personal leave to cover the missed time, and the arrest was discovered only by a report in the newspaper.

At the time of his arrest, he had a gun in his possession, for which he had a permit and which he could carry as a concealed weapon. Bob has been divorced twice and has no children. He currently lives alone. He has completed the eleventh grade but not his General Educational Development (GED). School records reveal he was often truant and was suspended three times for fighting. He served two years in the military and was honorably discharged after being found to have a “severe personality disorder that made him unsuitable for duty.”

Part 1: Planning

Tasks:

On the basis of the case scenario, create a 3- to 5-page plan in a Microsoft Word document addressing the following questions:

  • What is the purpose of the specialized interview?
  • How will you plan the assessment?
  • Whom will you interview and why?
  • What will you tell Bob about the nature and purpose of the evaluation and its potential consequences? Why?
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of a telephone interview?

In addition, answer the following:

  • What assessment instruments will you administer to Bob? Why?
  • How will you evaluate the truthfulness of his responses?
  • What methods will you use to deal with Bob’s defensive posture in interviews?

Part 2: Client Statement

In Part 1, you created a broad plan of action to investigate the threat Bob poses to the company. To conduct the risk assessment for Bob, in this part of the assignment, you will explore the existing risk assessment questionnaires you can administer to him.

Tasks:

Create a 1- to 2-page reference paper (below the plan you created in Part 1) addressing the following:

  • Identify a single risk assessment questionnaire or instrument used by psychologists. Find four references—web-based references or published scientific reports—on the instrument or on the process of risk assessment.
  • Your list of references should include at least two articles for and two articles against the risk assessment questionnaire or instrument in general (write a 1-paragraph summary of each reference you provide).

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

Submission Details:

  • By Wednesday, August 16, 2017, save your compiled document as M1_A3_Lastname_Firstname.doc and submit it to the M1 Assignment 3 Dropbox.
Assignment 3 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Described the purpose of the interview and prepared a well-articulated plan to conduct the assessment.
16
Identified the assessment instruments and methods you would use with Bob and justified their use.
12
Identified the methods you would use to evaluate the truthfulness of Bob’s responses.
12
Provided the information you would disclose to Bob before conducting the investigation and justified it.
12
Stated the advantages and disadvantages of a telephone interview.
12
Submitted a well-structured report providing an appropriate rationale for your choices.
8
Identified a risk assessment questionnaire used by psychologists that you can use for your investigation.
8
Listed at least two articles for and two articles against the risk assessment questionnaire or risk assessment in general.
8
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
12
Total:
100

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Need Help With This Assignment Must Be Original With All Requested Information ALSO DQ QUESTION IS ATTACHED appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

Innovation | ECO 100 Principles of Economics | Strayer University

 

The world around us is changing all the time, and those changes are revolutionizing the way we work and the careers we pursue.

Think about how one innovation has affected you at home, work, or school. 

In paragraph 1, explain how the innovation has altered the way that you complete daily tasks. 

In paragraph 2, explain how the innovation, itself, has changed over time.