Cyberlaw module7 discussion

 What are the legal consequences of the Erin Andrews’ invasion of
privacy case?  Is this case relevant to the recent allegations that some
Hilton hotel rooms have hidden cameras that videotape unsuspecting
guest?  (See  https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/05/us/hilton-worldwide-hotel-hidden-camera-lawsuit/index.html)  Minimum 250 words. 

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Cyberlaw module7 discussion appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

Cj 2300 mod 4 susie

 Follow the assignment guidelines as discussed in the syllabus. Susie leaves school and, while driving home, hits and kills her criminal law professor.   Outline a changing set of facts and circumstances which would make this an offense of capital murder, voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, and negligent homicide. 

  

Written Assignments – Topic Papers

The students will be presented with scenarios that require a resolution by the student based on information in the textbook.  Grades for problems will be based on the student’s ability to recognize and discuss the issue.  Each assignment is worth 50 points. (50 points X 2 assignments = 100 total points). The ultimate answer is not as important as the student’s ability to recognize the issues and apply the law to the facts in the scenario.  The response should include a statement of the law relevant to the issue and application of that law to the facts. These answers should be at least 700 words, double-spaced 12 point font, one inch margins.   Students shall reference the text at least FOUR (4) times in each paper and include a word count and bibliography (i.e., formal citation of the textbook) at the end of the paper. Internet sources will not be allowed. References must ONLY come from the text. However, the references must be independent (no doubling up of references).

Written assignments are designed to aid you in critically thinking about a variety of criminal justice topics and to get you engaged in the problem solving process. They may be utilized in the discussion board to stimulate dialogue and to prompt any questions you may have about the criminal justice system. Your responses should be thorough and scholarly. Avoid jargon and street language as you are completing each of the responses to these questions. For instance, “cop” is generally unacceptable, “police officer” is preferred. A person may be “mentally ill” or “legally insane,” not “nuts”.

Complete responses must be submitted by 11:59 P.M. EST pm the date due by posting through Blackboard. It is YOUR responsibility to make sure you have correctly attached the file and submitted the work. You can do this by going into your grade book and clicking on the green asterisk (!) to see what files attached. 

Scoring Rubric – 50 points total

· Length, grammar construction of paper – 10 points

Paper less than 700 words, poor grammatical usage, poor document construction – 0- 3 points.

Paper 700 + words, many grammatical problems, moderate document construction 4 – 6 points

Paper 700+ words, few grammatical problems, good paper construction 7 – 10 points

· Theoretical Source work – 10 points

No theoretical component, insufficient cites used, internet sources, no bibliography, theory cited not explained. Uses no references, the wrong references (internet, Wikipedia) or uses the same cite repeatedly. 0 – 3 points

Theoretical component lacking substance. Theory referenced but not explained mistakes with theory/citations. References not clearly marked. Some overlap on citations used. 4 – 6 points

Well cited, four references well marked in the text including page numbers, Citations/theory cited correctly. Bibliography well documented. 7-10 points  

· Critical thought 10 points

No expansion of theory – no insight. Does not relate own experience/observations to paper. 0 – 3 points

Some expansion of theory – little to moderate insight. Relates experience somewhat accurately. 4-6 points

Expands theory to own experiences and observations. Questions/confirms text/citations with own insight. 7-10 points.

· Fits Assignment Parameters 20 points

Assignment not followed. Does not address topics as noted. 0 – 5 points

Follows some aspects of assignment, but does not address all topics sufficiently 5 – 15 points

Addresses all aspects of assignments and goes beyond parameters as spelled out in the assignment 15 – 20 points  

· Referencing examples:

Direct – As stated by the Schmalleger, “At common law, all attempts were punishable as misdemeanors. (Schmalleger, pg. 117). 

Indirect – Schmalleger (2006 pg. 117) notes that all attempts were punishable as misdemeanors at common law.

Bibliography page: Schmalleger, Frank (2006).  Criminal Law Today An Introduction with Capstone Cases, 3e. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson / Prentice Hall.

Internet sources and information will not be used. 

Reply 1 and 2 ,150 words each one by 02/25/2020 at 4:00 pm

Re: Topic 4 DQ 1
“An environment that does not support its nurses through education, training, and debriefing of high-risk practice behaviors may lead to increased errors, decreased accountability, and poor patient outcomes.” (Thomas, 2018).
This quote from our text says a lot to me about leadership. Nurses need to be advocates for their patient’s care plans and safety of all the patients in the facility. The nurse also needs to be an advocate for the employer to be able to boldly and confidently speak highly of the services offered and how it will help the patient get their diagnosis and assist them in their care plan. If the nurse cannot speak highly or respect the employer, I believe this shows from the nurse and this will make the patient more leery or untrusting in the employer and the services that they provide. A patient wants to be with a nurse who loves their job and their place of employment so they can feel comfortable and trusting in the care that they will receive. Nurse leaders need to be able to speak freely amongst their staff to ensure the employees are happy with their role and that they can be a good example of the mission and vision statement for the organization.
Reference
Thomas, J., (2018). Chapter 4. Grand Canyon University (Ed.). Nursing Leadership & Management: Leading and Serving. Retrieved from: https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs451vn/nursing-leadership-and-management-leading-and-serving/v1.1/#/chapter/34Reply 2
Nurse leaders wno adovcate for their emploees with the use of education and training, and provide a supportive environment of behaviors that could reduce patient errors and increase accountability, are likely to have produce better patient outcomes.  Leadership in nursing, can drive these patient improvements, by advocating for nurse staffing issues (ie, patient ratio related to accuity, having ancillary staff, allowing nurses to self schedule).
As a surgical nurse, there has been a push for many years, to make surgical smoke evacuation for procedures which have the likelyhood to generate more smoke plume.  Electrocautery devices, laser prodedures and laparoscopic devices all have the capabiility to gerare surgical smoke.  Brething surgidal smoke plume, without evacuating the smoke during ertain cases is the equivalent to smoking up to 27 to 30 cigarrettes (Vortman, & Thorlton, 2020). 
Without the support from nurse leaders, regarding smoke evacuation in the Operating Room (OR), these hazards will continue to exist.  Leaders should be cognizant, and plan to budget for smoke evacuation devices.  Surgical patients, may not be aware of the hazards generated by inhaling surgical smoke plume.  Toxins in surgical smoke have been found to be toxic and harmful.  Surgiclal staff members have a much greater exposure for longer time frames, making them even more at risk during certain cases (Vortman, & Thorlton, 2020).  I believe you provided a well written post, and I do believe trust must exist between nurse leaders and staff members.  Good information, well done post!
Reference
Vortman, R., & Thorlton, J. (2020). Empowering Nurse Executives to Advocate for Surgical Smoke–Free Operating Rooms. Nurse Leader. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2020.10.004

imagine you are the owner of an it consulting business you have been contracted to help an organization operate effectively to protect their client s information what best practices would you implement to make sure that an organization protects client 1

magine you are the owner of an IT Consulting Business. You have been contracted to help an organization operate effectively to protect their client’s information. Chapter 15 covers best practices for audits, security policy, network management tools, software testing, etc. What best practices would you implement to make sure that an organization protects client information.

Requirements

2 pages

Provide a minimum of 3 references on the initial post.

Proper APA Format

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post imagine you are the owner of an it consulting business you have been contracted to help an organization operate effectively to protect their client s information what best practices would you implement to make sure that an organization protects client 1 appeared first on Essay Writers.