Mouth Cancer caused by the use of Tobacco (smoking and smokeless) – custom papers

/in /by

Mouth Cancer caused by the use of Tobacco (smoking and smokeless)
Paper details:
1. Discuss the Normal and Abnormal Anatomy & Physiology leading to the condition.
2. Include what type of cell, tissue, organ and organ system involved. Show how it affects other organs or organ systems.
3. Include your Conclusion.
4. Include your bibliography or resources.
5. Provide five questions pertaining to your topic (with five choices each or choice for True or False and highlight your answer)
6. An Electronic copy should be available to submit to Turnitin.com when instructed.
7. A hard copy should be submitted. Typewritten (Font 12, double spaced)
8. Minimum of Two pages.
9. Reporters may be considered for discussion in class.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Mouth Cancer caused by the use of Tobacco (smoking and smokeless) – custom papers appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

Weekly news round-up | Education homework help

/in /by

 

Research the internet or local newspapers about an issue regarding child protection. The article/newspaper article must be within the last 6 months and you must DEAL WITH ONLY CURRENT NEWS ABOUT A CHILD PROTECTIVE ISSUE OR AN ISSUE that can manifest itself into a child abuse/neglect.

For instance: child poverty, lack of education, children’s death, lack of investigation procedures, etc.

Provide a copy of the article in your submission. If this article is on a newspaper you may scan the article for the class and instructor to review and attach it next to your review.

Please follow these instructions in detail as you will be evaluated in your ability to perform the following: 

1. Come up with a title for your article review paper. This title should reflect the focus of your review and NOT the title of the article. Decide between a declarative title, descriptive title or interrogative title. Write your cover page properly. Ensure that you follow APA guidelines for your paper. If you should have any questions about APA format, you are encouraged to use the APA resources available in the course.

2. Write the introduction of your review. The introduction of the article review will have the identification sentence. It will also mention the central themes of the article and the arguments and claims of the author. You also need to state the author’s thesis. Sometimes, the thesis has multiple points. The thesis may not be clearly stated in the article, so you may have to determine the thesis yourself.

Don’t: make statements in the first person (“I”).

Do: give an overall impression of the article using the 3rd person and a formal, academic style. 

  • Your introduction should only be 10-25% of your review.
  • End the introduction with your thesis. Your thesis should address the focus of the article you chose:
    • For example: Although the author has some good points, his article is biased and contains some misinterpretation of data from others’ analysis of the effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy in the prevention of child/abuse and neglect.

Summarize the article. Express the main points, arguments, and findings of the article in your own words, referring to your summary for assistance. Show how the article supports its claims. Make sure to include the article’s conclusions. This may be done in several paragraphs, although the length will depend on requirements established by your instructor or publisher. 

Don’t: cover specific examples, statistics, or background information familiar to experts in the field.

Do: capture the main points of each section, as space allows.


  • Use direct quotes from the author sparingly.
  • Review the summary you have written. Read over your summary several times to ensure that your words are an accurate description of the author’s article.

Write your critique. Use your outline of opinions to write several paragraphs explaining how well the author addressed the topic. Express your opinion about whether the article was a clear, thorough, and useful explanation of the subject. This is the core of your article review. Evaluate the article’s contribution to the field and the importance to the field. Evaluate the main points and arguments in the article. Decide if the author’s points help her argument. Identify any biases. Decide if you agree with the writer, then provide sufficient support as to why or why not. End by suggesting which audiences would benefit from reading the article.

Don’t: fill your review with a long list of unrelated critiques.

Do: tie your grievances and praise together into a coherent argument, forming your own thesis.

  • Support your critique with evidence from the article or other texts.
  • The summary portion is very important for your critique. You must make the author’s argument clear in the summary section for your evaluation to make sense.
  • Remember, this is not where you say if you liked the article or not. You are assessing the significance and relevance of the article.
  • Use a topic sentence and supportive arguments for each opinion. For example, you might address a particular strength in the first sentence of the opinion section, followed by several sentences elaborating on the significance of the point.

Conclude the article review. In a paragraph, summarize the main points of the article, as well as your opinions about its significance, accuracy, and clarity. If relevant, also comment on implications for further research or discussion in the field.

  • This should only be about 10% of your overall essay.
  • For example: This critical review has evaluated the article “Protective Measures employed by a corrupt child abuse and fractured system” by Theresa McManon . The arguments in the article show the presence of bias, prejudice, argumentative writing without supporting details, and misinformation. These points weaken the author’s arguments and reduce his credibility.

Proofread. Reread the review. Look for grammar, mechanics, and usage mistakes. Make sure to cut any extra, unneeded information.

  • Make sure you have identified and discussed the 3-4 key issues in the article.

Assignment: Rough Draft Of Signature Assignment

/in /by

Length: 5–7 pages, 7–9 paragraphs, 1250–1600 words
This writing project includes a comprehensive application of the elements of critical reasoning that we are studying in this course. The main objective is to use the critical thinking strategies described in the course to analyze and evaluate contrasting arguments. You can preview the requirements for the final paper in the Week 8 assignment below.
This is not an opinion piece or persuasive essay. The goal is to present contrasting arguments using information from credible sources and to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these positions using content from the course.
As you put this together, are you following the critical analysis process that we emphasize in critical reasoning? This means fairly considering all research equally before reaching a conclusion.
Your rough draft should include 1–2 paragraphs for each of the following elements:

Introduction: Identify the issue/topic. Provide the necessary background and important recent developments. Define key terms and concepts.
Arguments and Counterarguments: Summarize the best arguments on both sides of the issue. Include relevant research from credible sources used to support each conclusion.
Evaluation of Critical Thinking: Assess the strength of the arguments and the quality of thinking surrounding this issue.

Identify weaknesses in critical thinking such as fallacies, rhetorical devices, vague language, and cognitive biases. Provide specific examples of how these weaknesses appear in arguments, using terminology and definitions from the course
Evaluate the quality of scientific and anecdotal evidence using the standards of inductive and deductive reasoning described in the course. Consider the quality of causal relationship, analogies, generalizations, and/or moral reasoning.

Conclusion: Analyze the totality of research and offer a critical thinker’s response to the issue. Identify your own position and experience with the issue and explain how your thinking of the subject has evolved as a result of your analysis.

You must use a minimum of 5 research references in APA Style and include in-text citations in your paragraphs. Include a minimum of 3 academic peer-reviewed books or journal articles. Other sources may be used as supplemental sources, such as journalistic, government, web-based, or media sources. Sources should not include dictionaries, encyclopedias, or general information websites like Wikipedia. Consult your instructor regarding any source of which you unsure. Use the WCU Library as your best resource.
Must be in APA 7th edition will upload title page. 5-6 pages with 5 scholarly sources. With subheadings in bold of Introduction ,  Arguments and Counterarguments, Evaluation of Critical Thinking & Conclusion
over one of these topics listed below.
Topic Selection: Students should select a topic they are very interested in that has academically legitimate research that supports a two-sided argument. Suggested topics include:

Gender neutral bathrooms
Police brutality/excessive force
Sex education in shool
Immigration reform
Taxpayer-funded health care
Refugees seeking asylum
Physician‐assisted suicide
Gun laws
Marijuana legalization (specify medical vs. recreational use)
Spanking to discipline children
Organic vs. non-organic foods
E‐cigarettes vs. tobacco cigarettes
Human-caused climate change (check with your professor on specifics)
Effects of social

 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Assignment: Rough Draft Of Signature Assignment appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

two introductions

/in /by

Requirement:To get started on your essay #1 on Free Speech (see below), I would like you to try writing two different versions of an introduction. Choose your topic, and write an introduction. Then, try to write a different or better introduction for the same topic. These small assignments count towards your final Essay #1 grade.

Make sure you have read the Essay #1 assignment (Essay #1 free speech topics, reposted below) and chosen one of the topics to write on. This is the topic you should address for the thesis worksheet, introductions, etc.


last week you already take the thesis worksheet and have the full essay.

For this one, you just need upload two introductions( we already have one last time)

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post two introductions appeared first on Essay Writers.