Assignment: Drafting a Process Evaluation

For this Assignment, you either build on the work that you completed in Weeks 6, 7, and 8 related to a support group for caregivers, or on your knowledge about a program with which you are familiar. Review the resource “Workbook for Designing a Process Evaluation”.

By Day 7

Submit a 4- to 5-page plan for a process evaluation. Include the following minimal information:

  • A description of the key program elements
  • A description of the strategies that the program uses to produce change
  • A description of the needs of the target population
  • An explanation of why a process evaluation is important for the program
  • A plan for building relationships with the staff and management
  • Broad questions to be answered by the process evaluation
  • Specific questions to be answered by the process evaluation
  • A plan for gathering and analyzing the information

control of hazardous energy

OSHA cited Cintas Corporation for forty-two willful violations of the lockout/tagout standard after a worker was killed when he fell into an operating industrial dryer while clearing a jam of wet laundry on a conveyor that carries the laundry from the washer into the dryer.

Read the News Release from the U.S. Department of Labor (Links to an external site.) from OSHA’s Archive.

For this activity, assume you have been hired as a safety consultant by Cintas Corporation to audit their energy control programs, particularly their lockout/tagout program. Provide a discussion as to what you would assess during your audit of their lockout/tagout program, being sure to address all the required procedures of a lockout/tagout program that is compliant with regulatory standards.

Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.

View the Control of Hazardous Energy rubric.

Your paper will automatically be evaluated through Turnitin when you submit your assignment in this activity.

Rubric

SFTY 590 6.4 Control of Hazardous Energy

SFTY 590 6.4 Control of Hazardous Energy

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, Grammar, Spelling, etc.

10.0 pts

Excellent 8-10 | The student always followed APA format and appropriately cited work and provided references. Very few, if any, grammatical errors and mistakes.

7.0 pts

Average 5-7 | The student usually followed APA format and usually properly cited work and provided references. Few grammatical errors and mistakes.

4.0 pts

Below Average 3-4 | The student sometimes followed APA format and did not always properly cite work and/or provide adequate references. Grammatical errors and mistakes were common.

2.0 pts

Poor 0-2 | The student failed to follow APA format, did not include citations and references. Frequent grammatical errors.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEnergy Control Programs Audit

90.0 pts

Excellent 80-90 | The student thoroughly identified and appropriately illustrated what he/she would assess during an audit of the company’s lockout/tagout program. The student did illustrate comprehension and application of the module content related to lockout/tagout at a high level. The student thoroughly addressed the required procedures of a lockout/tagout program and illustrated comprehension of regulatory standards.

79.0 pts

Average 71-79 | The student satisfactorily identified and appropriately illustrated what he/she would assess during an audit of the company’s lockout/tagout program. The student illustrated general comprehension and application of the module content related to lockout/tagout. The student did address the required procedures of a lockout/tagout program and satisfactorily illustrated comprehension of regulatory standards.

70.0 pts

Below Average 61-70 | The student identified and minimally illustrated what he/she would assess during an audit of the company’s lockout/tagout program. The student sometimes illustrated comprehension and application of the module content related to lockout/tagout. The student basically addressed the required procedures of a lockout/tagout program, but didn’t illustrate high levels of comprehension of regulatory standards.

60.0 pts

Poor 0-60 | The student failed to identify and appropriately illustrate what he/she would assess during an audit of the company’s lockout/tagout program. The student failed to illustrate comprehension and application of the module content related to lockout/tagout. The student did not address the required procedures of a lockout/tagout program and didn’t illustrate comprehension of regulatory standards.

90.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post control of hazardous energy appeared first on Essay Writers.

What makes Minnesota unique in terms of a model for health system reform?

Assignment Required Reading:http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/case-study/2013/mar/1667_edwards_medicaid_minnesota_case_study_final_v2.pdf
Review the case study by clicking on the link. Prepare a paper that answers the following questions.
What are accountable care organizations (ACOs)?What makes Minnesota unique in terms of a model for health system reform?Why are states experimenting with different models of integrated care?Are ACO’s a viable model to reduce the rate of growth in per-capita Medicaid spending? Why or why not?
Your paper should include the following:
Four to six pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.Three to five peer reviewed references cited in the assignment.Remember, you must support your thinking/opinions and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported; in-text references used throughout the assignment must be included in an APA-formatted reference list.References should be current, not more than five years old; additional references articles from the popular press such as the WSJ and Washington Post should also be considered.Format paper in APA writing requirements.

Discuss the t-4 program and other aspects of Nazi Eugenics through the early days of the Nazi regime through the concentration camp experimentation on camp inmates – custom papers

Discuss the t-4 program and other aspects of Nazi Eugenics through the early days of the Nazi regime through the concentration camp experimentation on camp inmates

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Discuss the t-4 program and other aspects of Nazi Eugenics through the early days of the Nazi regime through the concentration camp experimentation on camp inmates – custom papers appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.