The second writing project is going to ask you to synthesize what several sources say about one of the issues related to the novel Coronavirus (look back at week one assignments for topics/ideas). For this discussion board, think about what topic you may want to explore, and locate one online source that discusses that topic.

In an initial post by Wednesday:

Read and attach/link your article to the discussion board.

Explain who the author/source is and what that may tell us about the argument, give a brief overview of the argument(s), and then respond to the argument. What do you think of the argument?

By Sunday, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by locating an additional source for each that address the classmate’s issue. With your attach/linked additional source, explain how it can add to, complicate, or respond to the original source.

Evaluation:

• I will not grade your participation based on quantity, but rather on overall quality and regularity (ie., that you offer regular and valuable contributions to the class discussion). Your comments should offer new insights, work to advance the overall discussion, and provide constructive feedback, critique, and praise your peers.
• In order to receive full points for this discussion, you should follow these guidelines.
  • Are your comments expansive and relevant? Do you further the discussion in a meaningful way?
  • Did you respond to multiple peers and engage in multiple conversations?
  • Were you a regular and valuable participant over the life of the discussion without monopolizing the conversation? You will not receive full points for logging in once to post and make a couple replies. You should consistently follow and add to the conversation over the course of the week. For instance, try to make your post at least 24-48 hours before the discussion ends and then fill that time period with multiple reposes in multiple conversations. Do not log in once to post and respond to others.
  • Were you respectful and constructive in your feedback to your peers?

This assignment aligns to outcome 2. 4

————————————————————–

This is a discussion okay. It is one page long.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post db2 the issues 1 appeared first on Quality Nursing Writers.

Pick one of these pairs of works about a common subject. Analyze each work and compare it to the other using the following guiding questions:

For each work, analyze purpose:

What do you think the purpose is?
What specific aspects or elements of the work suggest the purpose you have identified?
For each work, analyze audience:

Identify primary/secondary audiences, as appropriate
Identify all relevant audience characteristics and categories for each audience (i.e., knowledge level, personality, biases, etc.)
Explain your reasons for characterizing the audience the way you do (i.e., What’s your evidence for your conclusions?).
Compare the two analyses:

Are the purposes the same for each work? Different? How do you know?
Are the audiences the same for each work? Different? How do you know?

Sample Solution

The post Purpose and Audience Analysis appeared first on homework handlers.