i need a 200 word monodrama about arthur miller 1

/in /by

 Write a 200+ word monodrama based on and from the perspective of your historical figure. The speech should be be informed by your research. So you should probably pick a major moment in this person’s life or career. While, of course, the words can be made up, the situation they are speaking in should be at least somewhat based on real history.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post i need a 200 word monodrama about arthur miller 1 appeared first on Quality Nursing Writers.

Media and Information Literacy Paper

/in /by

PROMPT: For this Essay, draw both The Social Dilemma and All the President’s Men to argue whether it is worth jeopardizing mental health and personal security to release compromising information to the public.

Give your essay a creative title that simultaneously grabs your readers attention and gives insight about what to expect to read in your essay. Scholars often accomplish this by having a creative title, followed by a colon, followed by a practical subtitle:
Creative Title: A Practical Subtitle
The Cookies of the Dark Side: An Analysis of Morality in Star Wars
Write the Work Cited on a separate last page. You must cite (and therefore write about) both all the Presidents Men and The Social Dilemma. You may also cite other sources.
o  You are also welcome (and encouraged) to quote directly from Konnikova or Field Guide to Lies and other sources weve covered this unit as evidence or explanation of your analysis.

All quotes and paraphrases require correct MLA in-text citations,

Provide textual evidence with summary, paraphrases, and quotes (sparingly), but avoid quoting long passages and dont let the quotes do the talking for youonly use quotes as textual evidence that you then analyze. All quotes and paraphrases should be in MLA format. (Consult the MLA section of Little Seagull.)

When necessary, provide brief summary statements to familiarize your readers with the scene under analysis, but do not allow plot summary to outweigh your analysis and evaluation.

Your essay response will be strengthened by careful, close readings of the texts. (The texts in this case refer to the films.) Rely on the text as verification of your own claims and evidence.

Do NOT use second person (you). Try to avoid using first person (I and “we”) as well, but, if you must, use it sparingly.

I expect your essays to demonstrate your understanding of the craft-related advice from Style, the content-related advice from They Say, I Say, and the grammatical concepts from Little Seagull.

Assume you know more about the films and about critical reasoning than your readers. As such, make sure you provide them with enough background and context to understand your argument.

Your introduction should establish context for your argument.

Your thesis statement must make an arguable claim.

The essay will be graded according to the requirements bullet-pointed above and this rubric:

Research outline and annotated bibliography

/in /by

Only need outline (please see attachment) and annotated bibliography right now. The actual paper is not needed right now.

PROBLEM: You have been directed by your corporate or organizational president to research one of the following situations/problems and prepare a formalized research paper. This paper should be addressed to the president, board of directors, and your professor. For this research, you should conduct a review of literature based on the current practices being used in today’s organizations (in terms of your selected research problem/situation).

For your research project, please select one of the following problem or situational areas to research. As you conduct your secondary and/or primary research, you should also develop a well-developed strategy as to how to implement your strategy into this organization. One way to view the selected problem is to think of a current or previous organization, in which you might focus your research efforts towards. For example, you may be facing the same problem in your current organization – so you could write this paper, based on addressing this particular problem with your current organization. If you do not see the relevance of any of these problems with your current or past employers – just write your paper as if you were employed with a Fortune 500 company or an organization currently in the news.

Here is the listing of potential problems or situations from you can select your research topic from:

1. Creation and implementation of an electronic usage (i.e., email, computer, or other computer technology) policy to be used in the organization.
2. Technological changeover from one computer system to a newer computer system (keep in mind the possible conversion problems).
3. Creation and implementation of a revised disciplinary policy to replace a current policy, which is not working (and lawsuits have resulted from the current, poorly written disciplinary policy).
4. Creation and implementation of a new compensation and benefits package (please remember that the president and board of directors may not be as accepting of this particular topic area… but it is worth the challenge of trying to convince them differently).
5. Creation and implementation of a new performance appraisal system or method of conducting performance appraisals.
6. Creation and implementation of an effective recruiting and retention program to enhance the quality of employees and management within the organization.

7. Rollout of a change management initiative.

8. Creation and implementation of a succession plan for mid level and C-Suite leaders.

AUDIENCE:
Please write your research paper as if your organizational or corporate president and/or board of directors (paper should be written in third person) would review and consider its findings and recommendations. However, your professor will be the final reviewer for this paper.

 You will be required to prepare an annotated bibliography with some of the articles/books you plan to cite in your final project. Please follow the sample provided with these instructions. You will be required to have 6-8 entries. 

Assignment 6 | Education homework help

/in /by

CHAPTER 11: COPING WITH BURNOUT Should Paul have demanded a higher salary at Liberation so he could have stayed? Have you ever known people who sacrifice themselves so much to a project or cause that they end up backing away from it and not coming back?
 
Have you ever been burned out while involved in a social cause–or any project for that matter? What caused it? Failure to sent boundaries? Too much time commitment? Too little progress? A sense of isolation? Does fear of burnout hold you back from social involvement?
 
Have you ever felt let down by people you’ve worked with on a project, poitical or otherwise? How did you respond? How much do you think personal disappointment or rejection plays a part in people’s withdrawal from social causes. Similarly, how much do you think a healthy community can keep people involved, even when the challenges are difficult?
 
Do the examples from this chapter (and earlier ones) give you models for balancing larger commitments and personal lives?
 
How would you apply earlier concepts in this book, like the perfect standard, to explaining why people don’t always participate in important social causes? Does understanding the barriers to involvement make it easier to keep on when people don’t always respond to our call?
 
Have you ever felt let down by a political leader you worked for, voted for, or simply vested hopes in? If they’ve done some of what you hoped for but not enough, does this book offer ways to keep engaged nonetheless, to support them where you agree and speak out and challenge them where you don’t?
 
 
Relate the traps of purism to the perfect standard.
 
 
Do you think that the relationship of the civil rights movement to presidents Kennedy and Johnson or the labor movement to Roosevelt holds lessons for today. Explain. For extra credit, read a book on either or both of these movements and explore its lessons, like Frances Fox Piven and Richard Cloward’s Poor People’s Movements, Taylor Branch’s Parting the Waters and Pillar of Fire, or Doug McAfdam’s Freedom Summer.
 
 
If you’ve been involved in community issues, do you take the time to celebrate your achievements and victories? How could you do this more?
 
Why do you think Lieutenant Ehren Watada was able to maintain his stand without breaking down? Does thinking through potential adverse consequences in advance make it easier to later endure them?
 
Have you ever experienced a situation where acknowledging vulnerability or voicing uncertainty actually made you stronger? Describe.
 
Why is it important that Loeb almost didn’t go to the Hiroshima event that ended up so nurturing his soul? Have you ever held back from communities or events that actually might strengthen you if you participated?
 
Are there any other ideas in the chapter that could help prevent your burning out?
CHAPTER 12: THE FULLNESS OF TIME This chapter reviews many of the ideas found throughout the book about social involvement. List the messages Loeb gives here that you think are most useful or inspiring.
 
Does our current time seem one of possibility, of apprehension, or a mix of the two? Explain.
 
Talk about Jacob Riis’s stonecutter metaphor. Have you ever chipped away at a seemingly impossible task until suddenly you surmounted the barriers and you were able to achieve what you sought to accomplish? 
What does Loeb mean by radical patience? How did Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King, and Susan B. Anthony exemplify this? How can you relate this concept to your life and the things that you see need changing?
 
Did you know the story of Stanislav Petrov and how close we came to nuclear war in the eighties? What does this story say about our capacity, as Americans or as humans, to act in ways that produce potential disaster, and also to bury that potential? What are its lessons in terms of global climate change?
 
How does humor help us keep going in difficult situations or times? Can you think of examples, from the book or your experience? Does it seem incongruous that people like Desmond Tutu and the Dalai Lama seem to be constantly cracking jokes? What’s the relationship of their humor to their amazing achievements?
 
Loeb tells lots of stories about how stubborness can be a virtue, from Pete Knutson’s fishermen friends refusing to accept their skipper’s verdict that “It’s all over boys. We’re done for, ” to Stanford climate scientist Steven Schneider refusing to be demoralized by the climate change deniers, to the seventy-eight-year-old grandmother shaking her finger at the young Coast Guardsman. What do these invididuals have in common? How could they be models for you in keeping on?
 
What changes have you witnessed or read about that make you hopeful?
 
Meredith Segal talks about drawing strength from relatives who’ve worked for justice. Do you have relatives or friends whose courage you’ve admired in situations you can learn from? 
Sonya Tinsley talks about “picking your team,” and choosing those who try to live their convictions, versus the team of the cynics. Which team would you choose to live your life with? What are you hopeful about, and what motivates your hope? Has this book changed your sense of what you might be able to achieve?
 
Can you imagine yourself living to 100, like Hazel Wolf, and being involved your entire life? What qualities allowed Hazel to keep on? Can we learn from Hazel’s ability to take on the most serious issues, yet keep enough of a sense of humor so she never takes herself or others too seriously? How could you develop a balance between more personal activities that nurture your soul (like Hazel’s hiking and kayaking) and work that gives back to the community?
Has reading Soul of a Citizen made you feel more connected to the river of social justice that historian Vincent Harding describes? If so, how?
 
What does Vaclav Havel mean by calling hope “an orientation of the heart”? Do you agree? And if so, how can we teach people this orientation?
What are the differences and similarities between religious and secular frameworks for hope? What mix gives you hope in your life? We’re defining home in this case not as passive wishing, but as as Jim Wallis said, as “believing despite the evidence” and then, because of your actions, “watching the evidence change.”
 
How would you answer Rabbi Hillel’s question in terms of how you’ve lived your life, and how you want to live it from this point on?