June 2021 – Page 893 – Homework Handlers

topic 1 dq 1 11

June 21, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

Please respond with a paragraph to the following post, add citations and references.

I think that the perceived tension of scientism and postmodernism is very human at its core. Scientism concludes that “…all reality to physical or material phenomena.” (Shelly & Miller, 2006). Scientism believes that all reality is only explained by science. This belief centers on the exclusivity of science as the only reason for reality to exist. With this being said, postmodernism questions all the theories that are presented including that of science, henceforth scientism. This tension is very human at its core. Humans are naturally inquisitive and curious. Millions of years of innovation can be traced to this very humanly attitude. Both philosophies can be adapted as worldviews and neither right or wrong but more personal. There are many other worldviews that are all a preference of the person influenced by many factors including culture, experiences, knowledge, among others. With this being said, this tension I think is very healthy as we need some sort of conflict to express our own interests and choices. This tension brings about innovations in science and schools of enlightened thought processes in postmodernism. Religion and spiritualistic beliefs fall grow as a result of this tension which brings about a whole new belief system and thought process especially in health care delivery and systems. In healthcare, there needs to be a holistic understanding implementing elements of science as well as moral and ethical principles to be able to provide efficient and effective care of the whole individual. It is the responsibility of the health care provider or worker to work through these dilemmas to provide the best care possible guided by the philosophies they hold dear to their practice. As it is stated in the lecture, both these philosophies, among others lay a groundwork for the understanding of health care practice today.

References

Grand Canyon University. (2015).Worldview Foundations of Spirituality and Ethics. [Webpage]. Retrieved from Grand Canyon University Online Website: https://lc-ugrad3.gcu.edu/learningPlatform/user/us…

Shelly, J. A., & Miller, A. B. (2006). Called to care: A Christian worldview for nursing (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post topic 1 dq 1 11 appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

Developing and Testing Self-Report Scales

June 21, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

Chapter 15

Developing and Testing Self-Report Scales

*

Question

Tell whether the following statement is true or false:

Scale development begins with a sound conceptualization of the construct (the latent variable) to be measured, excluding its dimensionality.

Answer

False

Scale development begins with a sound conceptualization of the construct (the latent variable) to be measured, including its dimensionality.

Conceptualizing the Construct

Scale development begins with a sound conceptualization of the construct (the latent trait) to be measured, including its dimensionality.
Unobservable latent trait
Unidimensional

*

Type of Scale

Scale selection is done before items can be generated.

Two broad categories of multi-item reflective scales

Traditional summated rating (Likert)
Latent trait

*

Generating Item Pool

Sources
Existing instruments
Research literature
Concept analyses
In-depth studies
Clinical observations

Decisions about Item Features

Number of items
Response items
Positive and negative stems
Item intensity
Item time frames

*

Number of Items

Domain sampling model: homogeneous set of items from a hypothetical universe of items
Goal is to provide appropriate redundancy so idiosyncrasies can be cancelled out.
Recommends starting with 3 to 4 times as many items as you will have in your final scale

Response Options

Scale items contain:
A stem
Response options
For example, strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree

Positive and Negative Stems

The objective was to include items that would minimize the possibility of an acquiescence response set—the tendency to agree with statements regardless of their content.
Many experts currently advise again including negative and positive items on a scale.

*

Item Intensity

The intensity of the statements (stems) should be similar and fairly strongly worded.
Statements should not be so extremely worded as to result in universal rejection.

*

Item Time Frames

A time frame should not emerge as a consequence of item development.
It should be decided upon in advance, based on the conceptual understanding of the construct and the needs for which the scale is being constructed.

Wording the Items—Readability

Clarity
Jargon
Length
Double negatives
Double-barreled items

*

Question

Once content validity has been established at a satisfactory level, the scale must be administered to a development sample. What is the typical number of respondents who are representative of the target population?

100

150

250

300

Answer

D

Once content validity has been established at a satisfactory level, the scale must be administered to a development sample—typically 300 or more respondents who are representative of the target population.

Content Validity

Satisfactory level
Development sample
300 or more respondents representative of target population

Field Testing the Instrument

Developing the sampling plan
Developing a data collection plan
Preparing for data collection

Question

Tell whether the following statement is true or false:

Exploratory factor analysis is used to reduce a small set of variables into a larger set of underlying dimensions, called factors.

Answer

False

Exploratory factor analysis is used to reduce a large set of variables into a smaller set of underlying dimensions, called factors.

Analysis of Scale Development Data

Basic item analysis

Inter-item correlation
Item–scale correlations

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA)

Factor extraction
Principal components analysis (PCA)
Factor rotation—orthogonal or oblique

*

Illustration of Factor Rotation

*

Scale Refinement and Validation

Revising the scale
Scoring the scale
Conducting a validation study

Confirmatory factor analysis

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

CFA is a second study often undertaken to validate the scale.
A subset of sophisticated statistical techniques (structural equation modeling)
Involves tests of a measurement model
Stipulates the hypothesized relationship between latent traits and manifest variables (items)

*

Interpretability of Scale Scores

Interpretability: the degree to which one can assign qualitative meaning
Percentile
Standard scores
Norms
Cutoff points

Critiquing Scale Development Studies

Methods used
Whether the evidence regarding the scale’s psychometric adequacy is sufficiently sound
See Box 15.1

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Developing and Testing Self-Report Scales appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

Midterm reflective Journal | | Nursing Homework Help Service

June 21, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

Hello-Please reference order NH34470 and NH34349 for this reflective assignment. Please include that course material that got me excited was the peer to peer reviews and seeing the development and progression of the paper. Components i did not adequately understand was how to go about login in my hours on core elms which I hope to address during week 8 with the instructor via zoom. Please see the rest of the instructions below:

Title your journal “Midterm Reflective Journal.” Reflect on your opinions on the coursework presented over the first eight weeks. What course material made you excited? Were there components that you did not adequately understand? Your reflection should be insightful and analytical. Please submit two to three pages and reference where you have met specific course objectives as listed:

Critically analyze evidence from varying research methods.
Demonstrate an understanding of the concepts related to the design and conduct of varied qualitative and quantitative research methods.
Analyze and apply the philosophical and/or theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative research methods.
Evaluate various evidence-based practice models for their effectiveness in meeting current organizational and interdisciplinary service needs.
Critically analyze and synthesize the evidence to identify an EBP problem in practice.
Develop Chapters I and II to address the identified EBP problem.

Inspection report. | Environmental science homework help

June 21, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

For this assignment, choose either Option A or Option B below.

*******Standards are attached below in word document******

Option A Conduct an inspection of a workplace for compliance with the means of egress requirements in 29 CFR 1910.36 and 1910.37, and prepare a report of your findings. You can use your current workplace or a local business or industry if you can get permission. Your report should contain the following items: a brief description of the workplace inspected; a compliance checklist prepared for the specific workplace and the standards being evaluated; noncompliance observed, including the full OSHA standard citations; recommended corrective actions; and a summary of overall compliance. The report should be a minimum of two pages in length (double-spaced), including the checklist. The report must follow APA guidelines for formatting, and the report must include a title page and reference page.

Option B Many workplaces use portable ladders to conduct work (e.g., painting, repairing) or to access supplies and materials. Locate any ladders used in your workplace, and conduct an inspection of them for compliance with 29 CFR 1910.23 and 1910.26. If you are able to observe any ladders in use, evaluate whether they are being used in accordance with the standards. Your report should contain the following items: a brief description of the workplace inspected; a compliance checklist prepared for the specific workplace and the standards being evaluated; noncompliance observed, including the full OSHA standard citations; recommended corrective actions; and a summary of overall compliance. BOS 4025, OSHA Standards 2 The report should be a minimum of two pages in length (double-spaced), including the checklist. The report must follow APA guidelines for formatting, and the report must include a title page and reference page. Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.