Calculations shown | Economics homework help

1.     A prison psychologist recorded the number of rule infractions for 15 prison inmates over a six-month period to be 5, 4, 2, 4, 3, 5, 2, 0, 4, 4, 5, 5, 3, 4, and 3.

 

a.      Make a frequency table.

 

b.     Make a histogram based on the frequency table.

 

c.      Describe in words the shape of the histogram.

2.     Identify and solve this problem by hand.

 

The head of public safety notices that the average driving speed at a particular intersection averages μ = 35 mph with a standard deviation of σ = 7.5 mph. After a school speed limit sign of 20 mph is placed at the intersection, the first 40 cars travel past at an average speed of 32 mph. Using the .01 significance level, was there a significant change in driving speed?

 

a.      Use the five steps of hypothesis testing

b.     Sketch the distributions involved.

c.      Figure the confidence limits for the 99% confidence interval.

3.     You will have to use a combination of StatCrunch and hand calculations (e.g., effect sizes) to solve the following problems.

 

A social psychologist gave a questionnaire about concern for farm workers to seven participants before and after they attended a film about union organization of farm workers. The results are shown below with high scores meaning high concern. Using the .05 significance level, do these results support the hypothesis that the film affected concern for the lives of farm workers?

 

Scores on the Concern Measure

Participant      Before             After

A                     17                    20

B                     7                      4

C                     10                    11

D                     13                    15

E                      8                      5

F                      9                      8

G                     11                    14

 

a.      Use the five steps of hypothesis testing.

b.     Figure the effect size and find the approximate power of this study.

4.     You will have to use a combination of StatCrunch and hand calculations (e.g., effect sizes) to solve the following problems.

 

A team of cognitive psychologists studying the effects of sleep deprivation on short-term memory decay had eight participants stay in a sleep lab for two days. Four participants were randomly assigned to a condition in which they were not permitted to sleep during that period, while the other four participants were allowed to sleep when they wanted to. At the end of the two days, the participants completed a short-term memory task that yielded the results in the table that follows. Using the .05 significance level, did sleep deprivation reduce short-term memory?

 

Mean Number of Letters Remembered

Sleep Deprived           Normal Sleep 

7                                  9

8                                  8

7                                  11

9                                  7                     

 

a.      Create the appropriate graph for this problem.

b.      Use the five steps of hypothesis testing.

5.     A sports psychologist gave a questionnaire about healthy eating habits to randomly selected professional athletes. The results are displayed below. Using the .05 significance level, is there a difference in healthy eating habits among professionals in the three sports?

Baseball Players         Basketball Players      Football Players

32                                27                                27

27                                36                                23

26                                25                                26

35                                30                                20

 

a.      Make a graph for the data set. (done already)

b.      Figure the effect size of this study.

c.      Conduct a planned contrast for Baseball versus Football players (using Tukey’s HSD).

6.     A researcher is interested in the effects of sleep deprivation and caffeine intake on mood. Participants were randomly assigned to a sleep condition (normal or deprived) and a caffeine condition (0 cups, 2 cups, or 4 cups). After the manipulations, mood was measured (such that higher numbers indicated better mood). The results were as follows:

 

            Normal Condition                              Deprived Condition

            0 cups  2 cups  4 cups                          0 cups  2 cups  4 cups

            16        18        18                                0          5          6

            17        20        17                                6          4          8

            20        20        17                                3          4          6

            19        19        17                                2          2          7

            18        18        16                                4          5          8

 

Analyze these data using a factorial analysis of variance and including R2 for each effect.

 

7.     An advertising firm wanting to target people with strong desires for success conducted a study to see if such people differed in the types of television shows they watched. Randomly selected participants recorded the shows they watched for a week, then their desire for success was assessed, and finally they were divided into two groups. Low Success seekers watched 8 comedies, 15 romances, 6 documentaries, 13 dramas, and 3 news shows. High Success seekers watched 3 comedies, 3 romances, 9 documentaries, 7 dramas, and 8 news shows. Using the .05 significance level, is the distribution of type of shows watched different for participants having high and low desires for success?

 

a.      use the five steps of hypothesis testing.

b.     Figure a measure of effect size and indicate whether it is small, medium, or large.

 

 

Descriptive statistics of the scale that you are constructing and other scales used for validity analysis – M, SD, Min, Max (3 points) Information about the analysis of inter-item consistency

PSY 3094 Psychological Measurement – Scale Construction Project
The aim of this project is to develop a scale measuring a construct related to psychology and to report its psychometric properties. You will work in groups and prepare a report including the following componets given in the table below. The Assessment Rubric summarizes the details that should be included in each part of the report and how they will be graded. Please submit a copy of this rubric with your paper for grading.

Title Page
including the title of the project, the Group No/Name, the Name, Surname and Student No of the group members

Main Text
organized in subtitles of Introduction, Preparation of the Scale, Data Collection, Data Analysis, Evaluation of the Scale
References
in APA style

Appendices:
You should refer to the relevant appendices in text
Adapted from Improving Student Learning through Classroom Action Research: A Guide to Becoming an Action Research; Florida Department of Education https://tr.scribd.com/doc/132663674/action-research-assignment-and-rubric
SCALE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
Group No / Name: ____________________________________________________ Title of Project: _________________________________________________________
Section
 
REQUIREMENTS & POINTS

POINTS RECEIVED

Introduction
5 points
3 points
0 points

A detailed description/definition of the construct that you are measuring
An adequate description/definition of the construct that you are measuring, but some important details are missing.
No definition of the construct that you are measuring
5 points
3 points
0 points

A detailed – clear description of the importance of measuring the construct
The importance of measuring the construct is stated, but why it is important is not clear.
The importance of measuring the construct and its reasons are not stated.
10 points
5 points
0 points

A detailed-clear description/definition of the variable that will be measured for criterion-related/construct validity and why it is selected/how it is related to the construct that you are measuring.
The variable that will be measured for the criterion-related/construct validity is described/defined, but why it is selected/how it is related to the construct that you are measuring is not clear.
No description/definition of the variable that will be measured for the criterion-related/construct validity and no statement about why it is selected
Preperation of the Scale
First version of the scale

–  Detailed description of how the first items are created (3 points)
–  presentation of the items (in Appendix) (5 points)
–  information about the scaling method (2 points)


Analysis of Content validity

–  Characteristics of experts (number, age, gender, their expertise level)(2 points)
–  How experts rated the items (2 points)
–  The results of experts’ ratings (3 points)
–  Content validity coefficient (3 points)


Finalization of the Scale

–  the solution for the items on which the experts do not agree (2 points)
–  the final list of the items (in Appendix) (2 points)
–  how the scoring of the scale should be done. ( 1point)

Data Collection
Sample

–  the number of participants (1 points)
–  how the participants are recruited ( 2 points)
–  demographic characteristics of participants (required : Age (M, SD, Min, Max), gender distribution; optional:education level, SES, other characteristics that are important for the construct you are measuring etc.) (2 points)


Measures/Instruments– demographic information form & presentation in Appendix (3 points)
Information about how the variable that is included for the criterion-related/construct validity is measured. If via a questionnaire, then

–  when and by whom the questionnaire is developed (1 point)
–  the number of items and the scale used for the rating (2 points)
–  how the score is computed (1 point)
–  psychometric properties of the original questionnaire and also in your data (2 points)
–  presentation of the questionnaire in Appendix (1 point)


Procedure

–  consent form (1 point)
–  presentation of consent form in Appendix (1 point)
–  order of the measures (1 point)
–  paper-pencil vs. online (1 point)
–  duration (1 point)


Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics of the scale that you are constructing and other scales used for validity analysis – M, SD, Min, Max (3 points)
Information about the analysis of inter-item consistency

–  how it is calculated (2 points)
–  report of the coefficient (3 points)
–  Interpretation of the score for inter-item consistency (high-low etc, whether it will change if some items aredeleted) (3 points)
–  Report of SEM (3 points)Information about the analysis of the criterion-related/construct validity
–  How it is calculated (3 points)
–  Report of the validity coefficient (3 points)
–  Interpretation of the score (5 points)Optional: Information about the analysis of split-half reliability (5 additional points)


Evaluation of the Scale
Evaluation of the scale that you are developing in terms of its reliability and validity (5 points) Limitations of the study (sample, problem of restricted range, procedural problems etc.) (3 points) A general conclusion ( 2 points)

References
5 points
2 points
0 points

All citations appearing the text match the reference list. The reference list is consistent in APA style and error free.
References partially match text citations. Reference list is inconsistent with regard to APA style.
References missing or do not match citations. Reference list is not consistent with APA style.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

2n +3n +7n = -4

2n +3n +7n = -4

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post 2n +3n +7n = -4 appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

Psilocybins relations to neural network patterns and potential use for treatment of psychiatric behaviors/disorders.

This research review paper will focus more on the results and discussion of the papers and how the five primary literature papers relate to each other and inform us as a whole on the topic: Psilocybins relations to neural network patterns and potential use for treatment of psychiatric behaviors/disorders. What does one tell us that informs us in a new way (or conflicts) with the others? Do they reinforce what we know? What do you make of disagreements between the papers? You’ll only talk about methods enough so someone could see how the data were collected (briefly, in a sentence of two). I have included the instructions, rubric, and 5 research articles to use.