module 05 powerpoint 1

This week, your assignment is going to be pieced together. You have created a business, identified trending issues, identified possible other ethical issues and done your best to get all of your employees on board.

All that is left is the presentation itself. For your submission this week you are asked to put together a PowerPoint presentation for your employees with accompanying/corresponding presenter notes for your reader. The PowerPoint slide presentation itself will include what is ethically expected of your employees on a day to day basis, all identified trending issues from Module 02, and all identified possible issues from Module 03 and guidance on what actions employees should be taking in these ethical dilemmas.

Given the fact that you are not presenting this PowerPoint and because a PowerPoint cannot present itself, you are asked to include accompanying “reader/presenter” notes in the notes section below each slide. These are the key notes that describe, explain and teach what the slide is trying to convey. Please note that a PowerPoint is not generally wordy and paragraphs should not be included on a slide. The slide itself is used as a visual for the audience and the notes section, which would be read by the presenter, is where the substance comes in.

Keep in mind it is HR’s job to expose all dilemmas that may plague their company or employees and adequately educate all employees so these concerns are not encountered in the workplace.

Your PowerPoint must be creative and a minimum of 10 slides not including the introduction or the reference slide.

Save your assignment as a Microsoft PowerPoint document.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post module 05 powerpoint 1 appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

Critical Reflection – custom papers

Critical Reflection
Order Description
Utilising Tilbury et al.’s “Generic Theories of Child Abuse and Neglect” analyse the material you reviewed for assignment 2(Annotated Bibliography- notion of intergenerational abuse). Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of this material, and the interventions that are more likely to flow from them.
Reflective analysis should include:
• use of theoretical and academic research material
• a consideration of your own personal perspective on the topic as it has developed over the course
of the unit
• an academic tone (though use of first person writing is acceptable in appropriate sections)i.e. using the academic research material in your own words
A minimum of five academic research materials is needed for this assessment with Tilbury et al included, and the assessment will be in this format below
Introduction
Personal starting point
History and the current situation
The potential positives of a separate system
My personal critical perspective of these proposals and a possible way forward
Conclusion
These are collection of journal articles you can choose from. Tilbury et al has already been uploaded to you during my assessment 2 Annotated Bibliography, which is a continuation of this assessment 3
• Fernandez, E 2014, ‘Child protection and vulnerable families: trends and issues in the Australian context’, Social Sciences, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 785-808.
• Higgins, D & Katz, I 2008, ‘Enhancing service systems for protecting children’, Family Matters, no. 80, pp. 43-50.
• Tilbury, C. 2007, ‘Theories about child abuse and neglect’, in Good practice in child protection, Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, Australia, pp. 19-44.
• Mandla K 2003, ‘Engaging with children and young people – beyond theory to practice’, paper presented to the eighth Australian Institute of Family Studies Conference, Melbourne, 12-14 February.
• Mason, J & Falloon, J 1999, ‘A children’s perspective on child abuse’, Children Australia, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 9-13.
• Lansdown, G 2010, ‘The realisation of children’s participation rights: critical reflections’, in B Percy-Smith & N Thomas (eds), A handbook of children and young people’s participation: perspectives from theory and practice, Routledge, London, pp. 11-23.
• Unicef n.d., Convention on the rights of the child.
• Douglas, H & Walsh, T 2009, ‘Mothers and the child protection system’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 211-29.
• Tilbury, C, Osmond, J, Clark, J & Wilson, S 2007, ‘Risk, harm and needs’, in Good practice in child protection, Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, Australia, pp. 58-79.
• Higgins D, Bromfield, L, Higgins J & Richardson N 2006, ‘Protecting Indigenous children: views of carers and young people on ‘out-of-home care”, Family Matters, vol. 75, pp. 42-9.
• Tilbury, C 2013, ‘Child protection proceedings in the children’s court in Queensland: therapeutic opportunities lost’, Australian Journal of Family Law, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 170-87.
• Ainsworth, F & Hansen, P 2012, ‘Doing harm while doing good: the child protection paradox’, Child & Youth Services, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 146-57.
• Keddell, E 2011, ‘Reasoning processes in child protection decision making: negotiating moral minefields and risky relationships’, British Journal of Social Work, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1251-70
• Mudaly, N & Goddard, C 2006, ‘Children’s voices: their experience of professional interventions’, in The truth is longer than a lie: children’s experiences of abuse and professional interventions, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK, pp. 103-19.
• Arney, F & Scott, D 2013, Working with vulnerable families: a partnership approach, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Port Melbourne, Australia.
• Breckenridge, J & Laing, L (eds) 1999, Challenging silence: innovative responses to sexual and domestic violence, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest, NSW.
• Butler, I & Shaw, I (eds) 1996, A case of neglect? Children’s experiences and the sociology of childhood, Avebury, Aldershot.
• Connolly, M, Crichton-Hill, Y & Ward, T 2006, Culture and child protection: reflexive responses, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, Philadelphia, PA.
• Doyle, C 2012, Working with abused children: focus on the child, 4th edn, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
• Lonne, B, Parton, N, Thomson, J & Harries, M 2009, Reforming child protection, Routledge, New York.
• Mason, J & Fattore, T (eds) 2005, Children taken seriously: in theory, policy and practice, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
• Mudaly, N & Goddard, C 2006, The truth is longer than a lie: children’s experiences of abuse and professional interventions, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, UK.
• Parton, N 1985, The politics of child abuse, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
• Scourfield, J 2003, Gender and child protection, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY.
• Thomas, N 2000, ‘Children, parents and the state’, in Children, family and the state: decision-making and child participation, Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, pp. 50-69.
• Tilbury, C, Wilson, L & Osmond, TC 2007, Good practice in child protection, Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Critical Reflection – custom papers appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

All questions need to be in apa format and approximate 300 each and sited

All questions need to be in apa format and approximate 300 each and sited

Question 1

Your assigned reading this week explains the importance of distinguishing between the types of ethics (e.g., mandatory, aspirational, principle, virtue). Understanding these differences is the foundation to ethical practice. The more professionals are anchored in an understanding of ethics and relevant applications, the more likely they will effectively apply their understanding to ethical dilemmas.

Discuss the differences between mandatory ethics and aspirational ethics.

• What are the differences between principle ethics and virtue ethics?

• Which type or types of ethics are represented in your profession?

You are encouraged to explore any applicable professional codes of conduct, i.e., American Psychological Association (APA) or American Correctional Association (ACA). Explain why you believe this is the case.

Question 2

Professionals in all areas from business to counseling commonly anticipate possible cultural differences with clients. At the same time, they inevitably encounter cultural differences with clients as well as with other professionals or with the views of organizations in which they work. These differences can compromise the services that clients receive unless effectively resolved.

For this discussion question, provide at least two examples from within your profession of situations in which the policies of real or fictitious organizations seem contrary to the best interests of a client due to cultural differences.

Discuss the implications of this for ethical practice.

Question 3

Privileged communication is a legal concept that prohibits the disclosure of confidential communications, while referring to confidentiality as the ethical responsibility of professionals to safeguard clients from unauthorized disclosures. This is one example of an important distinction that spans the legalities and ethical nature of professional practice. An understanding of these distinctions is not only characteristic of a responsible professional, but is also vital to the provision of ethically and legally accountable services in clients’ best interests.

Discuss the differences between confidentiality, privacy, and privileged communication, as well as the differences between the duty to warn and duty to protect. What would you think is the most important aspect of confidentiality as it relates to your profession?

Present a scenario in which you discuss some of your ideas in simple and clear language, as though you were having an actual discussion with a colleague who was in training. Then, discuss situations in which it is legally required that you breach confidentiality.

Question 4

A whistleblower, by definition, is someone who brings an unethical, immoral, or illegal business practice to the public’s attention. Whistleblowers have a difficult time in doing this, and they often find their lives changed because of their actions. Sometimes they are shunned and receive death threats. It is common for the family members to feel the effects of a whistleblower’s behavior.

Dr. Jeffrey Wigand became one of the best-known whistleblowers after his experience was turned into a movie, The Insider. He proved that tobacco companies were deliberately boosting the nicotine content of cigarettes, making them more addictive and cancer causing. However, like other whistleblowers, he suffered from tremendous stress and received death threats and other forms of intimidation for doing the right thing.

How did Dr. Wigand show moral intelligence in this situation? Jeffrey Wigand put his economic future as well as coworkers and his family at risk to expose the tobacco companies. Would you have done the same thing?

Question 5

As the field of psychology and other disciplines has continued to expand, opportunities to engage in multiple professional activities have also increased. At the same time, this abundance of opportunities also presents ongoing challenges requiring an understanding of personal limits. To rise above these challenges, we as professionals need to understand their limits and apply this understanding to professional situations that we encounter.

Discuss the situations in which you believe you may now be or could be less competent, situations that could require you to make a professional referral. Discuss how you would make a referral and what you would say to your client. You can create a scenario of your choice with a client in which you need to make this referral. When discussing this scenario, address (1) the background and presentation of the client, (2) your working relationship with the client to date, and (3) why the referral is essential and ethically significant in this scenario. Using the Internet, research your professional code of ethics for examples related to conflicts and the need to refer your client or case out.

Question 6

Ethics is a code of thinking and behavior governed by a combination of personal, moral, legal, and social standards of what is right. Although the definition of “right” varies with situations and cultures, its meaning in the context of a community work involves many guiding principles with which most community activists and service providers would probably agree. Above all else, do no harm. Hippocrates put this in words over 2,000 years ago, and it’s still Rule Number One.

You have volunteered to run a community violence-prevention program, working with kids who are gang members or gang hangers-on. The kids trust you, and sometimes tell you about some of their less-than-savory activities. The police also know you work with gang members and often ask you for information about kids. What are you obligated to tell them or to keep from them?

If you are actively striving to do “good,” how far does that obligation take you? If there are issues affecting the community that have nothing to do directly with the one you’re concerned with, do you nonetheless have an obligation to become involved? What if you don’t really understand the whole situation, and your involvement may do as much harm as good—do you still have an ethical obligation to support or become active on the right side? What if your support or activism endangers or compromises your community intervention?

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post All questions need to be in apa format and approximate 300 each and sited appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

Identify the premises and conclusions in the following passages. Some premises do support the conclusion; others do not

Identify the premises and conclusions in the following passages. Some premises do support the conclusion; others do not

Chapter 1 INSTRUCTIONS Identify the premises and conclusions in the following passages. Some premises do support the conclusion; others do not. Note that premises may support conclusions directly or indirectly and that even simple passages may contain more than one argument. Example Problem A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. —The Constitution of the United States, Amendment 2 Example Solution Premise: A well-regulated militia is necessary for the security of a free state. Conclusion: The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. PROBLEMS 5. Standardized tests have a disparate racial and ethnic impact; white and Asian students score, on average, markedly higher than their black and Hispanic peers. This is true for fourth-grade tests, college entrance exams, and every other assessment on the books. If a racial gap is evidence of discrimination, then all tests discriminate. —Abigail Thernstrom, “Testing, the Easy Target,” The New York Times, 15 January 2000 6. Good sense is, of all things in the world, the most equally distributed, for everybody thinks himself so abundantly provided with it that even those most difficult to please in all other matters do not commonly desire more of it than they already possess. —René Descartes, A Discourse on Method, 1637 7. When Noah Webster proposed a Dictionary of the American Language, his early 19th-century critics presented the following argument against it: “Because any words new to the United States are either stupid or foreign, there is no such thing as the American language; there’s just bad English.” —Jill Lepore, “Noah’s Mark,” The New Yorker, 6 November 2006 8. The death penalty is too costly. In New York State alone taxpayers spent more than $200 million in our state’s failed death penalty experiment, with no one executed. In addition to being too costly, capital punishment is unfair in its application. The strongest reason remains the epidemic of exonerations of death row inmates upon post-conviction investigation, including ten New York inmates freed in the last 18 months from long sentences being served for murders or rapes they did not commit. —L. Porter, “Costly, Flawed Justice,” The New York Times, 26 March 2007 9. Houses are built to live in, not to look on; therefore, let use be preferred before uniformity. —Francis Bacon, “Of Building,” in Essays, 1597 10. To boycott a business or a city [as a protest] is not an act of violence, but it can cause economic harm to many people. The greater the economic impact of a boycott, the more impressive the statement it makes. At the same time, the economic consequences are likely to be shared by people who are innocent of any wrongdoing, and who can ill afford the loss of income: hotel workers, cab drivers, restaurateurs, and merchants. The boycott weapon ought to be used sparingly, if for no other reason than the harm it can cause such bystanders. —Alan Wolfe, “The Risky Power of the Academic Boycott,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 17 March 2000 11. Ethnic cleansing was viewed not so long ago as a legitimate tool of foreign policy. In the early part of the 20th century forced population shifts were not uncommon; multicultural empires crumbled and nationalism drove the formation of new, ethnically homogenous countries —Belinda Cooper, “Trading Places,” The New York Times Book Review, 17 September 2006 12. If a jury is sufficiently unhappy with the government’s case or the government’s conduct, it can simply refuse to convict. This possibility puts powerful pressure on the state to behave properly. For this reason a jury is one of the most important protections of a democracy —Robert Precht, “Japan, the Jury,” The New York Times, 1 December 2006 13. Without forests, orangutans cannot survive. They spend more than 95 percent of their time in the trees, which, along with vines and termites, provide more than 99 percent of their food. Their only habitat is formed by the tropical rain forests of Borneo and Sumatra —Birute Galdikas, “The Vanishing Man of the Forest,” The New York Times, 6 January 2007 14. Omniscience and omnipotence are mutually incompatible. If God is omniscient, he must already know how he is going to intervene to change the course of history using his omnipotence. But that means he can’t change his mind about his intervention, which means he is not omnipotent —Richard Dawkins, The God Delusion (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2006) 15. Reason is the greatest enemy that faith has; it never comes to the aid of spiritual things, but more frequently than not struggles against the divine Word, treating with contempt all that emanates from God —Martin Luther, Last Sermon in Wittenberg, 17 January 154 INSTRUCTIONS Some of the following passages contain explanations, some contain arguments, and some may be interpreted as either an argument or an explanation. What is your judgment about the chief function of each passage? What would have to be the case for the passage in question to be an argument? To be an explanation? Where you find an argument, identify its premises and conclusion. Where you find an explanation, indicate what is being explained and what the explanation is. Example Problem Humans have varying skin colors as a consequence of the distance our ancestors lived from the Equator. It’s all about sun. Skin color is what regulates our body’s reaction to the sun and its rays. Dark skin evolved to protect the body from excessive sun rays. Light skin evolved when people migrated away from the Equator and needed to make vitamin D in their skin. To do that they had to lose pigment. Repeatedly over history, many people moved dark to light and light to dark. That shows that color is not a permanent trait —Nina Jablonski, “The Story of Skin,” The New York Times, 9 January 2007 Example Solution This is essentially an explanation. What is being explained is the fact that humans have varying skin colors. The explanation is that different skin colors evolved as humans came to live at different distances from the Equator and hence needed different degrees of protection from the rays of the sun. One might interpret the passage as an argument whose conclusion is that skin color is not a permanent trait of all humans. Under this interpretation, all the propositions preceding the final sentence of the passage serve as premises. PROBLEMS 15.The Treasury Department’s failure to design and issue paper currency that is readily distinguishable to blind and visually impaired individuals violates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, which provides that no disabled person shall be “subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by any Executive agency.” —Judge James Robertson, Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, American Council of the Blind v. Sec. of the Treasury, No. 02-0864 (2006) 16.Rightness [that is, acting so as to fulfill one’s duty] never guarantees moral goodness. For an act may be the act which the agent thinks to be his duty, and yet be done from an indifferent or bad motive, and therefore be morally indifferent or bad —Sir W. David Ross, Foundations of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939) 17.Man did not invent the circle or the square or mathematics or the laws of physics. He discovered them. They are immutable and eternal laws that could only have been created by a supreme mind: God. And since we have the ability to make such discoveries, man’s mind must possess an innate particle of the mind of God. To believe in God is not “beyond reason.” —J. Lenzi, “Darwin’s God,” The New York Times Magazine, 18 March 2007 18.Many of the celebratory rituals [of Christmas], as well as the timing of the holiday, have their origins outside of, and may predate, the Christian commemoration of the birth of Jesus. Those traditions, at their best, have much to do with celebrating human relationships and the enjoyment of the goods that this life has to offer. As an atheist I have no hesitation in embracing the holiday and joining with believers and nonbelievers alike to celebrate what we have in common —John Teehan, “A Holiday Season for Atheists, Too,” The New York Times, 24 December 2006 19.All ethnic movements are two-edged swords. Beginning benignly, and sometimes necessary to repair injured collective psyches, they often end in tragedy, especially when they turn political, as illustrated by German history —Orlando Patterson, “A Meeting with Gerald Ford,” The New York Times, 6 January 2007 20.That all who are happy, are equally happy, is not true. A peasant and a philosopher may be equally satisfied, but not equally happy. Happiness consists in the multiplicity of agreeable consciousness. A peasant has not the capacity for having equal happiness with a philosopher —Samuel Johnson, in Boswell’s Life of Johnson, 1766 Chapter 2 INSTRUCTIONS Identify the premises and conclusions in the following passages. Some premises do support the conclusion; others do not. Note that premises may support conclusions directly or indirectly and that even simple passages may contain more than one argument. Each of the following passages may contain more than one argument. PROBLEMS 1. The [Detroit] Pistons did not lose because of the lack of ability. They are an all-around better team. They lost because of the law of averages. They will beat the [San Antonio] Spurs every two times out of three. When you examine the NBA finals [of 2005], that is exactly how they lost the seventh (last game) because that would have been three out of three. The Spurs will beat the Pistons one out of three. It just so happens that, that one time was the final game, because the Pistons had already won two in a row. —Maurice Williams, “Law of Averages Worked Against Detroit Pistons,” The Ann Arbor (Michigan) News, 8 July 2005 2. Hundreds of thousands of recent college graduates today cannot express themselves with the written word. Why? Because universities have shortchanged them, offering strange literary theories, Marxism, feminism, deconstruction, and other oddities in the guise of writing courses. —Stanley Ridgeley, “College Students Can’t Write?” National Review Online, 19 February 2003 3. Racially diverse nations tend to have lower levels of social support than homogenous ones. People don’t feel as bound together when they are divided on ethnic lines and are less likely to embrace mutual support programs. You can have diversity or a big welfare state. It’s hard to have both. —David Brooks (presenting the views of Seymour Lipset), “The American Way of Equality,” The New York Times, 14 January 2007 4. Orlando Patterson claims that “freedom is a natural part of the human condition.” Nothing could be further from the truth. If it were true, we could expect to find free societies spread throughout human history. We do not. Instead what we find are every sort of tyrannical government from time immemorial. —John Taylor, “Can Freedom Be Exported?” The New York Times, 22 December 2006 5. The New York Times reported, on 30 May 2000, that some scientists were seeking a way to signal back in time. A critical reader responded thus: It seems obvious to me that scientists in the future will never find a way to signal back in time. If they were to do so, wouldn’t we have heard from them by now? —Ken Grunstra, “Reaching Back in Time,” The New York Times, 6 June 2000 INSTRUCTIONS Each of the following famous passages, taken from classical literature and philosophy, comprises a set of arguments whose complicated interrelations are critical for the force of the whole. Construct for each the diagram of premises and conclusions that you would find most helpful in analyzing the flow of argument in that passage. More than one interpretation will be defensible. PROBLEMS 1. A question arises: whether it be better [for a prince] to be loved than feared or feared than loved? One should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, one must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowards, covetous…. and that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined, because friendships that are obtained by payments may indeed be earned but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon. Men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserves you by a dread of punishment which never fails. —Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince, 1515 2. Democratic laws generally tend to promote the welfare of the greatest possible number; for they emanate from the majority of the citizens, who are subject to error, but who cannot have an interest opposed to their own advantage. The laws of an aristocracy tend, on the contrary, to concentrate wealth and power in the hands of the minority; because an aristocracy, by its very nature, constitutes a minority. It may therefore be asserted, as a general proposition, that the purpose of a democracy in its legislation is more useful to humanity than that of an aristocracy. —Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 183


 


The post Identify the premises and conclusions in the following passages. Some premises do support the conclusion; others do not appeared first on nursing assignment tutor.