ユニカ ESコアドリル振動用160mmSDSシャンク 316 x 181 x 180 mm ES-V160SDS 1
商品番号:Coie1-U01-2280
価格 14,390円当店通常価格 16,930円
12345678910
カートに加える
In Unit VII, you will turn in a research paper that will analyze the operations of the emergency operations center at one level of government and the interface between the public and private sectors. In this unit, you will choose the topic for your research paper.
Choose a natural or man-made disaster that required the interaction of local, state, and federal governments and the activation of the NRF.
In a one-page document, identify the disaster (not to exceed 10 years old), include a brief description, and describe the importance of this disaster. Format your work in APA Style (6th ed.), and upload it to Blackboard.
The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.
Conduct research for your final research paper by reviewing reputable Internet sources, after-action reports, and the CSU Online Library. Reference material will include five references with two of the references from a peer-reviewed journal. These references may change as the paper is written.
Write an annotated reference list in APA format, and upload the file to Blackboard. See CSU’s Citation Guide and the official APA Style blog for format and reference examples in APA Style (6thed.): http://blog.apastyle.org/
The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.
The research proposal includes a title page and introduction that describes the type of disaster (natural or man-made), magnitude of the disaster, and affected population as well as a general overview of the emergency operations center. Your proposal should include a minimum of 200 words. Any sources that you use should be documented in APA style to avoid plagiarism.
Please save your file as a .docx, .doc, or .rtf file before submitting it in Blackboard.
Your final research paper will be due in Unit VII of the course.
The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.
Submit your final research paper during Unit VII including all components of it you worked on in the previous units. Be sure to carefully proofread your final copy prior to submission, keeping in mind the Success Center presentations and Citation Guide you learned about previously in the course.
The objective of the research paper is to conduct an analysis of an Emergency Operations Center at one level of government during a disaster. The research paper consists of a title page, introduction, body, conclusion, and reference page. The paper will consist of nine pages, including a title page and reference page.
The paper will analyze, describe, and evaluate three of the following criteria:
Prior to submission of the research paper, carefully proofread the final copy for errors in grammar, punctuation, and APA Style. The CSU Writing Center is a valuable resource with tutors who can assist you while you edit your work. See “Resources” on the course homepage for a listing of student resources.
Please save your file as a .docx, .doc, or .rtf file before submitting it in Blackboard.
The following resource(s) may help you with this assignment.
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post reach paper assignments appeared first on Essay Writers.
Comparison of published disaster triage schemes and their value in an MCI. (What is the overriding reason to have a triage scheme? What are the good points and bad points of each? Are there scenarios in which one is better than another?)
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post scholarly paper 6 appeared first on Essay Writers.
Answer the following questions in three well-developed paragraphs (450- 500 words) using APA formatting, integrating two evidence-based resources to include clinical practice guidelines as well as the course textbook.
Topic: Heart Failure
ML is a retired registered nurse (RN) who has been given the diagnosis of Stage A heart failure. She knows from her RN education that she will definitely be placed on digoxin as a therapy. She remembers something about halos as something to be attuned to.
s concern about halos should digoxin be prescribed.RUBRIC:
ote: Scholarly resources are defined as evidence-based practice, peer-reviewed journals; textbook (do not rely solely on your textbook as a reference); and National Standard Guidelines. Review assignment instructions, as this will provide any additional requirements that are not specifically listed on the rubric.
Note: The value of each of the criterion on this rubric represents a point range. (example: 17-0 points)
Discussion Question Rubric – 100 PointsCriteriaExemplary
Exceeds ExpectationsAdvanced
Meets ExpectationsIntermediate
Needs ImprovementNovice
InadequateTotal PointsQuality of Initial PostProvides clear examples supported by course content and references.
Cites three or more references, using at least one new scholarly resource that was not provided in the course materials.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 pointsComponents are accurate and thoroughly represented, with explanations and application of knowledge to include evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role. Synthesizes course content using course materials and scholarly resources to support importantpoints.
Meets all requirements within the discussion instructions.
Cites two references.
35 pointsComponents are accurate and mostly represented primarily with definitions and summarization. Ideas may be overstated, with minimal contribution to the subject matter. Minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is present but missing depth and/or development.
Is missing one component/requirement of the discussion instructions.
Cites one reference, or references do not clearly support content.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 pointsAbsent application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role development. Synthesis of course content is superficial.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No references cited.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40Peer Response PostOffers both supportive and alternative viewpoints to the discussion, using two or more scholarly references per peer post. Post provides additional value to the conversation.
All instruction requirements noted.
40 pointsEvidence of further synthesis of course content. Provides clarification and new information or insight related to the content of the peer’s post.
Response is supported by course content and a minimum of one scholarly reference per each peer post.
All instruction requirements noted.
35 pointsLacks clarification or new information. Scholarly reference supports the content in the peer post without adding new information or insight.
Missing reference from one peer post.
Partially followed instructions regarding number of reply posts.
Most instruction requirements are noted.
31 pointsPost is primarily a summation of peer’s post without further synthesis of course content.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
Did not follow instructions regarding number of reply posts.
Missing reference from peer posts.
Missing several instruction requirements.
Submits post late.
27 points40Frequency of DistributionInitial post and peer post(s) made on multiple separate days.
All instruction requirements noted.
10 pointsInitial post and peer post(s) made on multiple separate days.
8 pointsMinimum of two post options (initial and/or peer) made on separate days.
7 pointsAll posts made on same day.
Submission demonstrates inadequate preparation.
No post submitted.
6 points10OrganizationWell-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument. Writing is concise with a logical flow of ideas
5 pointsOrganized content with an informative purpose statement, supportive content, and summary statement. Argument content is developed with minimal issues in content flow.
4 pointsPoor organization and flow of ideas distract from content. Narrative is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work.
Purpose statement is noted.
3 pointsIllogical flow of ideas. Prose rambles. Purpose statement is unclear or missing.
Demonstrates incomplete understanding of content and/or inadequate preparation.
No purpose statement.
Submits assignment late.
2 points5APA, Grammar, and SpellingCorrect APA formatting with no errors.
The writer correctly identifies reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately).
Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions and overuse of conjunctions.
There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors.
5 pointsCorrect and consistent APA formatting of references and cites all references used. No more than two unique APA errors.
The writer demonstrates correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability.
There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors.
4 pointsThree to four unique APA formatting errors.
The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of incorrect use of thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused.
Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors.
3 pointsFive or more unique formatting errors or no attempt to format in APA.
The writer demonstrates limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language).
The writer struggles with limited vocabulary and has difficulty conveying meaning such that only the broadest, most general messages are presented.
Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous.
Submits assignment late.
2 points5Total Points100
The post Heart Probs appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.
