criminal law assignment 4

/in /by

Debbie the defendant walked onto the front patio of Larry’s house and grabbed a laptop that was sitting on a table on the patio. Once Debbie left the patio, she went around to Larry’s backyard. She saw a window open in the kitchen. Debbie reached in through the window and was able to take a digital camera sitting on a table by the window in the kitchen. As Debbie was walking from the backyard toward the front of the house to leave, she noticed Larry pulling into his driveway. Debbie yelled at Larry, “stay away from me, or I will kill you!” Debbie then jumped into the bushes next to Larry’s house to hide.

Larry saw Debbie walking from the backyard of his house carrying something in her hands, but he was not sure what she had. Larry was scared that someone would be walking from his backyard. Larry called 911 and reported “a suspicious person” in his yard. The police immediately responded and were able to arrest Debbie who was still in the bushes next to Larry’s house. At the time of arrest, Debbie was holding a digital camera and laptop. Larry said he recently bought the laptop for $750. He paid $150 for the digital camera.

Next, locate the Minnesota State statutes regarding the following crimes:
Robbery
Burglary
Theft
Assault

For your written assignment, assume you are the prosecutor. Write a paper that addresses the following questions:

  • Based on the wording of Minnesota statutes, what crimes, if any, do you feel Debbie committed?
  • What are the elements of the offense she should be charged with?
  • What are the differences between the possible crimes?
  • What is the likelihood that Debbie will be convicted of these crimes?

Please be sure to prepare your assignment following APA citation and format requirements. You must include proper citations to any source you relied on for information that you include in your paper.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post criminal law assignment 4 appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

Post an explanation of the criteria you could use to evaluate alignment between data collection methods and other research components, such as the problem, purpose, research questions, and design. The

/in /by

Post an explanation of the criteria you could use to evaluate alignment between data collection methods and other research components, such as the problem, purpose, research questions, and design. Then, reflecting on the course content, discuss the extent to which your newly acquired research knowledge and skills can support your role as an agent of positive social change. Be specific and provide an example(s).

Be sure to support your Main Issue Post and Response Post with reference to the week’s Learning Resources and other scholarly evidence in APA Style.

Read a selection of your classmates’ postings.

By Day 6

Respond to a classmate by further supporting his or her criteria for evaluating alignment or respectfully offering a differing perspective.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post Post an explanation of the criteria you could use to evaluate alignment between data collection methods and other research components, such as the problem, purpose, research questions, and design. The appeared first on Psychology Homework.

econ 413 assignments set kindle book will be provide

/in /by

Exercise 1.1 Suppose that chemical X is manufactured using a raw material B that is available from a location called the “mine.” Production of one ton of X requires 1/3 of a ton of B. A firm called X Enterprises, which has a contract to deliver 30 tons of X to a location called the “market,” is trying to decide where to locate its plant. The mine and the market are 50 miles apart. Overland shipment of both X and B costs $2 per ton per mile shipped. However, additional costs must be incurred because a river passes between the mine and the market, and the river has no bridge. Goods must be loaded onto barges to cross the river, which is located 16 miles from the mine. Barge operators charge $1 per ton of X shipped across the river. However, since the input B is highly toxic when mixed with water, barge operators must charge an extremely high price to transport B across the river. This price defrays the cost of insurance that the operators must carry to meet liability claims should they accidentally pollute the river with their cargo. The cost of shipping one ton of B across the river is $195.
(a) Using the above information, find the transport-cost-minimizing location for X Enterprises. The answer can be found by computing transport costs at four locations: mine, market, mine side of the river, and market side of river. Assume that the width of the river is negligible, so that it can be ignored. Show your work.
(b) Illustrate your results in a carefully drawn diagram like that presented in figure 1.6 (use graph paper). Plot the input shipping-cost curve by plotting the input shipping costs at the same four locations as in (a) and then connecting the dots (the curve is drawn backward). Similarly, plot the output shipping cost at the four locations, and then connect the dots to generate the output shipping-cost curve. Then, plot the total shipping-cost curve by adding the input and output shipping costs at each of the four locations, plotting the points and connecting the dots. Using the diagram, identifying the best location for X Enterprises, which should be the same as your answer in (a). Note that the shipping-cost curves for this problem are straight lines with jumps at the river.
(c) Explain your results intuitively.
(d) Suppose that a bridge were built across the river, which would eliminate the cost of crossing it. Repeat (a), (b), and (c) under this assumption.
Exercise 1.2 Consider four cities, A, B, C, and D, located as follows: A D B C Suppose that the residents of these cities consume widgets, with consumption in each city equaling 100 widgets. The firm that produces widgets must decide how to arrange its production. It could set up four factories, one in each city, with each factory producing 100 widgets. In this case, the firm incurs no cost for shipping its output. Or the firm could locate its factory in the centrally located city, D. The single factory must then produce 400 widgets, 300 of which are shipped to cities A, B, and C. The shipping cost per widget is $2. A final assumption is that widget production exhibits economies of scale, with the cost per widget in a factory falling as output rises.
(a) Suppose the cost per widget varies with output as follows: cost is $4 if factory output is 100 widgets; cost is $1 if factory output is 400 widgets. In this situation, find the best arrangement of production for the firm (i.e., one central factory or four separate factories). The best arrangement leads to the lowest total cost for the firm, where the total is the sum of production and shipping cost.
(b) Repeat (a) if the cost per widget varies with output as follows: cost is $4 if factory output is 100 widgets; cost is $3 if factory output is 400 widgets.
(c) Explain intuitively any difference in the answers to (a) and (b). (d) Suppose production costs are those given in (a), and let shipping cost per widget be given by t. Although t = 2 in (a), what value of t would make the two arrangements for production (centralized vs. separate factories) equivalent in terms of cost?

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post econ 413 assignments set kindle book will be provide appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

colorectal cancer – custom papers

/in /by

colorectal cancer
Rangachari, P. K., & Mierson, S. (1995). A checklist to help students analyze published articles in basic medical sciences. Advances in Physiology Education, 268(6 Pt 3), S21-5. (APA style)
APPENDIX: Critical Evaluation of a Published Paper (Rangachari, 1995, S24-S25)
The report should consist of a critical evaluation of the objectives of the study, the methods used, the results, and the conclusions. To help you, we have developed a checklist that follows closely the format of a scientific report, which is conventionally divided into the following sections: Introduction, Methods and Materials, Results, Discussion, a list of References, and a short Abstract or summary.
Introduction
1.    Did the authors indicate why the study was undertaken?
2.    Was the background information provided adequate to undestand the aims of the study?
Methods
1)    Were the methods described in sufficient detail for others to repeat or extend the study?
2)    If standard methods were used, were adequate references given?
3)    If methods were modified, were the modifications described carefully?
4)    Have the authors indicated the reasons why particular procedures were used?
5)    Have the authors indicated clearly the potential problems with the methods used?
6)    Have the authors indicated the limitations of the methods used?
7)    Have the sources of the drugs been given?
8)    Have the authors specified the statistical procedures used?
9)    Are the statistical methods used appropriate?
Results
1)    Were the experiments done appropriate with respect to objectives of the study?
2)    Do the results obtained make sense?
3)    Do the legends to the figures describe clearly the data obtained?
4)    Are the data presented in tabular form clear?
5)    Are the legends to the tables clear?
6)    Has appropriate statistical analysis been performed on the data?
Discussion
1)    Were the objectives of the study met?
2)    Do the authors discuss their results in relation to available information?
3)    Do the authors indulge in needless speculation?
4)    If the results obtained were statistically significant, were they also biologically significant?
5)    If the objectives were not met, do the authors have any explanation?
6)    Do the authors adequately interpret their data?
7)    Do the authors discuss the limitations of the methods used?
8)    Do the authors discuss only data presented or do they refer consistently to unpublished work?
References
1)    Do the authors cite appropriate papers for comments made?
2)    Do the authors cite their own publications needlessly?
Abstract
1)    Is the abstract intelligible?

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post colorectal cancer – custom papers appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.