(you will find it on the description)

Assume that you are concerned that your client has recorded revenues that did not occur what audit objective would you assess as having a high risk of material misstatement.  Describe the type of procedures auditors perform as a part of their risk assessment procedures. In replies to peers, discuss whether you agree or disagree with their ideas and the examples provided, and justify your response using the topic materials.

unit 6 essay assignment

Write a 350-500 APA format word essay on the following topic:

Your QA team that has prescribed a set of procedures to be followed by the project team whenever a modified code/patch/application is released to the client. Your Project Lead informs that a release is required urgently by an important client. He says, all the steps in the procedure prescribed have been followed but due to time constraints each step is covered only to the extent of 30-50%. Further, the client needs the release in the next 2 hours itself. What will be your decision? Allow or not to allow the release? Why?

Also, discuss the importance of an action plan to ensure the issue doesn’t occur again. Note the importance of your internal quality and how to manage issues when the customer requirements require a need to deliver sooner. You are the contractor, how could you improve future performance? Could an external quality auditor assist in future time concerns?

Ensure the response focuses on benchmarking of quality metrics.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post unit 6 essay assignment appeared first on Essay Writers.

Discussion post 300 words due tonight

Take a close look at Farmer’s discussion on the codes of medical practice and documents such as Tavistock, for instance (chapter 8). Notice the gap between rhetoric and practice. Now reflect on how these different practices apply to the rich and the poor (individuals and countries). What does Farmer say is the major issue in global ethics when considering the health of the poor? According to the rhetoric, how are humans classified? How are they (we) classified when considering medical practice in relation to health (and human) needs? Justify your answer.

Note: These discussions and readings are geared to help you gain knowledge, guide and challenge your thoughts about global health issues, so these tasks are not supposed to be “easy” or something you can complete last minute. There is no right or wrong in your answers. However, you must demonstrate that you have done the required readings for each assignment AND gone beyond the readings presenting reading-informed personal reflections. To demonstrate that you have done the readings, you need to always cite your sources in text and use examples from those reading to support your statements with evidence. For instance, if you are discussing a concept presented by Farmer, don’t take it for granted that because everyone reads the same texts, what you are referring to will be “obvious” to everyone else in the class. Instead assume that nothing is “obvious” until you make it so, but properly acknowledging your source. So, going back to our example of Farmer, once you present your statement discussing one of his concepts, ideas and/or examples, you need to cite this author. You can presented in several ways, but here are a couple of examples: 
1. According to Farmer, …..[introduce his idea/your position]… [if using a direct quote ALWAYS use “quotation marks” and indicate page number]…. (2005, p.13).
2. Given the evidence [explain what this evidence is]/ Given the concept of “…present the concept…”/ In the example of US inpatients in… [remember to provide enough detail so everyone knows what you are referring to], I believe that…..[here incorporate your personal reflection on the topic]… (Crisp 2010, pp.21-23).

Note: Aim for a well researched, balanced and analytical approach to the information provided in the readings in your discussion posts. Be as clear and informative as possible.
Remember, your main post should be of a minimum 200-word length; your long reply of at least 50 words and your follow-up post does not have a word limit, but it is still a required part of your grading for this assignment. However, grading will be based on the quality of your content rather than quantity of words. The word limit is only a minimum length grading mark.

Homeland security threat analysis

Part 2

Free societies are at risk for terrorist acts for several reasons: a) loose control of public information; b) weapons, communications equipment, and explosives are easy to obtain; c) the ease of creating and operating functional networks and financial systems in free societies. Consider the following factors when analyzing threats:

Existence: a group/individual’s presence to access a specific locale
 

Capability: an acquired, assessed, or demonstrated ability to conduct an attack
 

Motive: intent, objective to conduct an activity
 

History: previous background of activity
 

Targeting: preparation of/for specific violent acts against individuals or populations

Select one of the three examples you discussed in your previous case study NTAS. Identify and discuss factors used in target selection. Provide ways in which the United States can mitigate such future attacks on the homeland. Include a background/overview (i.e., lone shooter or cyberattack), current mitigation methodologies, future solutions you think would be successful deterrents or strategies. Defend your views.

Assignments should be at least three (3) full pages double-spaced, not counting the cover or reference page. Paper format: (a) Cover page, (b) Header, (c) Body. Submit your assignment by the last day of this module.

  • Relevance:      All content is connected to the question.
  • Precision:      Specific question is addressed. Statements, facts, and statistics are      specific and accurate.
  • Depth      of discussion: Student presents and integrates points that lead to deeper      issues.
  • Breadth:      Multiple perspectives and references, multiple issues/factors are      considered.
  • Evidence:      Points are well-supported with facts, statistics, and references.
  • Logic:      Presented discussion makes sense; conclusions are logically supported by      premises, statements, or factual information.
  • Clarity:      Writing is concise and understandable, and contains sufficient detail or      examples.
  • Objectivity:      Writer avoids use of first person and subjective bias.
  • References:      Sources are listed at the end of the paper.

Provide specific examples and facts to support your views. Your references should be from government, peer-reviewed, subject matter expert sources. Your paper will not be longer than 5 pages (excluding cover sheet and reference page).

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Homeland security threat analysis appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.