annotated bibliographies 18

/in /by

1. List at least 15 sources in alphabetical order. These should From a economic book or economics article.

3. Include a 300 word summary of each source, which should include direct quotes. The goal here is for you to find the author’s thesis sentence. Please note: Your annotated bibliography entries will be much longer than the examples offered below.

4. Be proofread for grammar errors. For style guidance, go to https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Your bibliography should look something like this (only with longer entries):

author publisher date and introduction

Kirsch, Arthur. Shakespeare and Experience of Love. Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Arthur Kirsch in his study of Shakespeare works mainly focuses on analyzing the concepts that made Shakespeare’s work legendary. He explores Shakespeare’s plays such as Othello and Measure of Measure where he believes that the concepts of conflict and love approached by Shakespeare can be related to religion and psychology. In his explanation of the concept of love, he studies the characters in Othello such as Desdemona and Iago in trying to explain love and conflicts that develop from betrayal. He thinks that the

13 mins ago

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post annotated bibliographies 18 appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

Soc 205 assign 1 paper

/in /by

Assignment 1: The State Judicial Selection ProcessDue Week 5 and worth 200 pointsEach state within the United States has its own unique judicial selection process within its own court system. Using the Internet or Strayer databases, research the judicial selection process for different court systems from different states within the U.S. Court System. Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you:Discuss the judicial selection process of your state. Include, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Choose a second state, and describe the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Compare and contrast for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, identify the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Justify the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Justify the response.Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Detail the history and organization of the levels of the American court system and the issue of jurisdictional boundaries.Use technology and information resources to research issues in the criminal court and the judicial process in America.Write clearly and concisely about the American court system using proper writing mechanics and APA style conventions.Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.Criteria UnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% D Fair70-79% C Proficient80-89% B Exemplary90-100% A1. Discuss the judicial selection process of your state. Include, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Weight: 25%Did not submit or incompletely discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Did not submit or incompletely included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Insufficiently discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Insufficiently included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Partially discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Partially included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Satisfactorily discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Satisfactorily included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Thoroughly discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Thoroughly included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.2. Choose a second state, and describe the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely chose a second state, and did not submit or incompletely described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Insufficiently chose a second state, and insufficiently described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Partially chose a second state, and partially described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Satisfactorily chose a second state, and satisfactorily described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Thoroughly chose a second state, and thoroughly described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.3. Compare and contrast for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, identify the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, did not submit or incompletely identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Insufficiently compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, insufficiently identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Partially compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, partially identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Satisfactorily compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, satisfactorily identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Thoroughly compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, thoroughly identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.4. Justify the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Justify the response.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Did not submit or incompletely justified the response.Insufficiently justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Insufficiently justified the response.Partially justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Insufficiently justified the response.Satisfactorily justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Satisfactorily justified the response.Thoroughly justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Thoroughly justified the response.5. 3 referencesWeight: 5% No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirementsWeight: 10%More than 8 errors present7-8 errors present5-6 errors present3-4 errors present0-2 errors presentCriteria UnacceptableBelow 60% FMeets Minimum Expectations60-69% D Fair70-79% C Proficient80-89% B Exemplary90-100% A1. Discuss the judicial selection process of your state. Include, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Weight: 25%Did not submit or incompletely discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Did not submit or incompletely included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Insufficiently discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Insufficiently included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Partially discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Partially included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Satisfactorily discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Satisfactorily included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.Thoroughly discussed the judicial selection process of your state. Thoroughly included, at a minimum, the qualifications and steps that are taken in order to select judges for the different kinds of courts within your specific state.2. Choose a second state, and describe the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely chose a second state, and did not submit or incompletely described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Insufficiently chose a second state, and insufficiently described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Partially chose a second state, and partially described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Satisfactorily chose a second state, and satisfactorily described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.Thoroughly chose a second state, and thoroughly described the qualifications and the selection process for judges within that state.3. Compare and contrast for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, identify the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, did not submit or incompletely identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Insufficiently compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, insufficiently identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Partially compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, partially identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Satisfactorily compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, satisfactorily identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.Thoroughly compared and contrasted for both states the qualifications necessary for a prospective candidate to become a judge. Next, thoroughly identified the steps that the relevant persons / entities need to take in order to remove a judge from office for disciplinary reasons for each state.4. Justify the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Justify the response.Weight: 20%Did not submit or incompletely justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Did not submit or incompletely justified the response.Insufficiently justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Insufficiently justified the response.Partially justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Insufficiently justified the response.Satisfactorily justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Satisfactorily justified the response.Thoroughly justified the selection process for the state that you believe has the best system in place. Thoroughly justified the response.5. 3 referencesWeight: 5% No references providedDoes not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirementsWeight: 10%More than 8 errors present7-8 errors present5-6 errors present3-4 errors present0-2 errors present 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Soc 205 assign 1 paper appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

COPD Case Study

/in /by

COPD Case Study

Patient and History:

D.Z. a 65 year old man is admitted to a medical floor for exacerbation of his chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). He has a past medical history of HTN, which has been well controlled by enalapril for the past six years and a diagnosis of pneumonia for the three years. He appears as a cachectic man who is experiencing difficulty breathing at rest. He reports a cough productive of thick yellow green sputum. DZ seems irritable and anxious when he tells you that he has been a 2 pack a day smoker for 38 years. He complains of sleeping poorly and lately feels tired most of the time.

His vital signs:

BP 162/84 P 124 R 36 T 102. F SaO2 88% room air.

Admitting diagnosis: Exacerbation of COPD etiology to be determined.

His admission orders:

Diet as tol, OOB with assistance, O2 to maintain sats >90% , IV D5W @ 50 ml/hr , Strict I/O, ABGs in am, CBC with diff. BMP, Theophylline level on admission, CXR q 24 hrs,

Medication List:

• Prednisone 60 mg PO q Day

• Doxycycline 100 mg PO q 12 hr x 10 days

• Azithromycin 500 mg IVPB q 24 hr x 2 days then 500 mg PO x 7days

• Theophylline 300 mg PO BID

• Heparin SQ 5000 units BID

• Albuterol 2.5 mg/3 ml NS and Atrovent 500 mg by nebs Q 4-6 hrs

•  Enalapril 10mg PO q am

8. Identify three expected outcomes of D.Z’s treatment.

You notice a box of dark chocolate on D.Zs over the bed table. He tells you that he wakes at night and eats 4-5 pieces of dark chocolate. Several of your COPD patients have identified their craving for dark chocolate in the past.

10. What would you do to address dietary and nutritional needs with DZ and his wife?

11. List six educational topics that you need to explore with DZ.

 

“Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!”

The post COPD Case Study appeared first on Coursework Geeks.

Cis 539 week 2 assignment 1 social media and privacy

/in /by

Assignment 1: Social Media and Privacy Issues

Due Week 2 and worth 120 points

Social networks afford individuals the venue and technology to connect with many “friends”, both known and unknown. An individual’s activities on social networks can have security implications, especially if they adversely affect the corporate reputations of their employers. This practice is more obvious on professional social network sites that identify the employee’s employer, such as LinkedIn.

Imagine that you are a CIO of a company. As the CIO, the security and privacy of your organization is one of your primary concerns. It is your responsibility to review the risks and vulnerabilities of social media to your company and provide your employees with guidelines on how to interact with social networking sites, such as Twitter and Facebook, when representing your company.

Write a four to six(4-6) page guidelines for accessing Web 2.0 sites that:

  1. Select and describe three (3) social networking sites you are presenting in the context of cloud computing.
  2. Examine the risks and vulnerabilities to your employer associated with the social networking sites that you have selected.
  3. Summarize the mitigating strategies you would recommend to your CEO that affirm the organization’s privacy and security practice among social network sites.
  4. Suggest three (3) ways that your social network policy can protect your employer against:
  5. identity theft
  6. cybercrimes
  7. abusive marketing
  8. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment. At least one (1) must be from a professional journal in the IT field. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Compare and contrast private with public clouds.
  • Summarize business applications that can migrate to the cloud.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in cloud computing environments.
  • Write clearly and concisely about cloud & virtual computing topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.