Romeo and juliet film and text comparison

/in /by

 

OPTION 1: Read Romeo and Juliet and watch one of the following adaptations: Gnomeo & Juliet (2011), Chicken Rice War (2000), Romeo Must Die (2000), Romeo + Juliet (1996), Romeo and Juliet(1968), Romeo and Juliet (1966), West Side Story (1961), Romeo and Juliet (1954), Romeo and Juliet (1936). 

Now, for the play/film pair that you chose, address all parts of this question.

  1. Clearly identify two scenes from the written play that also appear in the film (however loosely) that you think are significant to the overall story, and explain why.
  2. Offer an assessment of how well you think the film portrayed the two scenes. In other words, was the film’s portrayal of these two scenes effective or ineffective? Why?
  3. Use at least two of the terms and concepts from Discussion 5.1 that you or your classmates posted to explain why the scenes portrayed in the film were effective or ineffective. For example, perhaps the film used specific music and lighting in a scene to effectively emphasize the tension of the scene. Underline or boldthe vocabulary, concept or technique you use as an interpretative tool in your post. 
  4. Finally, give your overall opinion about how the themes of this play translate to our contemporary world and why you think this play has had so many film adaptations.

humanities philosophy

/in /by

500 words or moe

6. Alain De Botton, in The News: A User’s Manual, alleges that news audiences suffer not so much from ignorance as indifference. Does he take one to be worse than the other? Could we be guilty of both? Explain his reasoning

4. Susan Stewart’s writing in “The Role of the Humanities in Contemporary Life” may be interpreted as a defense of the study of the humanities, but perhaps she is up to something else. What do you think? Explain your reasoning. If you see Stewart to be defending the humanities, from what or whom is she defending them, and what sort of defense does she offer? If she is engaged in some other sort of intellectual activity, describe what you take that to be.



 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post humanities philosophy appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

Practicum: Evidence-Based Practice And Evaluation Of The Project Through Measureable Goals

/in /by

APA format. 3 paragraph Read all Instructions. Age group 40-60  with uncontrolled Blood pressure in poor population

Please discuss the following points in your Practicum Discussion:

1.Identify one evidence-based behavior change that would promote health in your selected population.

2.Suggest one specific culturally sensitive, evidence-based, measureable intervention to address the health problem for your selected population.

3.Think in terms of measuring outcomes. What outcomes would you expect to see once the intervention(s) are in place? Be specific.

References

Required Readings

Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2016). Public health nursing: Population-centered health care in the community (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Chapter 15, “Evidence-Based Practice” (pp. 342–354)
Chapter 23, “Public Health Nursing Practice and the Disaster Management Cycle” (pp. 503–528)
Chapter 24, “Public Health Surveillance and Outbreak Investigation” (pp. 529–544)
Chapter 25, “Program Management” (pp. 545–567)

Required Media

Laureate Education (Producer). (2009a). Family, community and population-based care: Emergency preparedness and disaster response in community health nursing [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Practicum: Evidence-Based Practice And Evaluation Of The Project Through Measureable Goals appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

Case study 2: buenas dias

/in /by

CASE ANALYSIS 2 (Required to Complete Turnitin Check Before Forum Submission)
**Pay attention to the Case Analysis Grading Rubric found in the Application Assignment/Case Analysis Resources folder in Getting Started section.**
This case analysis requires you to analyze a family enterprise case situation, answer questions, and demonstrate knowledge based on information gained from prior and current course material by applying one concept from the course material in your response to each question.  Course concept material that you use may come from the readings, audio lectures, and/or required videos.  In addition, two credible external sources (outside of course material and at least one for each question) are required to support your case analysis.  Please see below.
Assigned Case:
Read the following case by clicking on the link:  Buenas Diaz
Answer the following questions:

Question 1
In order to maximize the likelihood that Carlos and Maria will agree to allocate money for the restaurant renovations, how should Flora frame her renovation proposal to them?  Be specific.  Think of this proposal meeting as a negotiation, where Flora needs to understand and appeal to each of the sibling stakeholders from both a family perspective (e.g., continuity, harmony, etc.) and a business perspective (e.g., costs, possible financing alternatives, etc.).Question 2 
Should the family renovate the restaurant?  Why or why not?Answering Case Questions:

  • Responses which are purely opinion and anecdotal are not considered to be substantive in nature.
  • Each question response should provide depth of analysis, significant insight, and application to at least one course concept.
  • Each question response should include at least one external source (outside of course material).
  • Make it easy to find your different responses by using a heading for each question (e.g., Question 1, Question 2).
  • Do not mix responses together.
  • Review the Case Analysis Grading Rubric.  A Turnitin score of 20% or less is required.  Must submit to Turnitin Check link first.

Case Analysis Submission Process:
Step 1:  Turnitin Check for Case Analysis (REQUIRED:  Submit Here First Before Forum)
First, submit your Case Analysis as a Microsoft Word file to the Case Analysis assignment link via the submission box shown below.
A Turnitin score will be generated.  If not at 20% or less, resubmit assignment until threshold is achieved.
Allow 24 hours for Turnitin report generations.Step 2:  Case Analysis Forum (REQUIRED:  Submit to Forum After Turnitin Check)
Second, once your Case Analysis has received a Turnitin score of 20% or less, copy and paste the same information/assignment to the Case Analysis Forum link. 
You must submit your Case Analysis to the forum for final grading.External Sources:

  • Two credible external sources to support information required, one for each question response (eg., Question 1 and 2 each have an external source).

Assigned textbook chapters from the course do not count as external sources.
Review the Case Analysis Grading Rubric.  A Turnitin score of 20% or less is required.  Submit to Turnitin Check link first.Turnitin Requirements:

  • For each case analysis, your similarity score must meet a threshold of no more than 20%.

A case analysis with greater than 20% similarity must be revised and resubmitted to Turnitin until the 20% threshold is achieved.
For resubmissions, it may take up to 24 hours for a new similarity score.
It is the student’s responsibility to allow enough time for Turnitin report generations and resubmission of their assignment to Turnitin if their initial report did not meet the 20% threshold.
A case analysis with more than 20% threshold will receive a zero.