June 2021 – Page 1632 – Homework Handlers

Help | Psychology homework help

June 15, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

For this assignment, you will be analyzing a sexual harassment case study media presentation entitled “Capshaw vs. Capratek.” This presentation will provide you with a description of the case as well as valuable information that will help you identify the different ethical dilemmas and legal issues involved. You will need to utilize all of the information you have studied, discussed and applied up to this point to thoroughly complete this case study.

Assignment Directions

Review the Capella media presentation entitled Capshaw vs. Capratek. Carefully peruse all of the supporting materials that are presented in the presentation, which include
- Introduction.
- The email from the HR director to you, describing your responsibilities.
- Capratek’s Intranet.
- A timeline of events.
- Organization charts.
- Affidavits from Capratek employees.
- Support Documents.
- Conclusion.
Once you have reviewed all of the documentation, complete the following:
- Analyze and prioritize the legal issues and ethical dilemmas related to the Capshaw vs. Capratek case study. Make sure to reference the documentation provided in the case study that helped you complete your analysis.
- Describe the ethical principles and standards related to the various legal issues and ethical dilemmas.
- Develop an action plan designed to address each legal issue and ethical dilemma, supported by ethical theories, principles, models and best practices.
- Support your analysis and action plan with recent, relevant academic literature, a review of laws and legal precedents applicable to the case study, and documented examples of best practices employed by other organizations.
- Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.

Remember to use your Assignment Worksheet [DOC] to help you outline your work and organize your resources.

Assignment Requirements

Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Length of paper: Submit 8–10 typed, double-spaced pages (title and reference pages not included).
Format: Format resources and citations according to current APA guidelines for style and format.
Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.
Sources: Cite at least five sources.

SCORING GUIDE

Your Work will be evaluated using this criteria.

VIEW SCORING GUIDE

Scoring Guide Criteria

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:

Competency 1: Demonstrate ability to analyze ethical dilemmas.
- Analyze the legal issues and ethical dilemmas related to a sexual harassment lawsuit.
Competency 2: Incorporate appropriate resources and information to make effective ethical and legal decisions.
- Support your analysis and action plan with recent, relevant academic literature, a review of laws and legal precedents applicable to the lawsuit, and documented examples of best practices employed by other organizations.
Competency 3: Develop legally sound solutions to ethical challenges that are supported by ethical theories, principles, models, and best practices.
- Develop an action plan designed to address each legal issue and ethical dilemma, supported by ethical theories, principles, models and best practices.
Competency 4: Apply ethical principles and standards to prevent or mitigate ethical dilemmas.
- Describe ethical principles and standards related to various legal issues and ethical dilemmas.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.
- Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for members of the psychological professions.

——-link http://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/psy8755element20078/wrapper.asp

Policy And Regulation Supporting Informatics And Technology Integration

June 15, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

Informatics Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet

Research and select one health or nursing informatics policy (within the past 5 years) or regulation for further study.

Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain the health or nursing informatics policy/regulation you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following:
- Briefly and generally explain the policy or regulation you selected. (1 paragraph)
- Explain the impact of the policy or regulation you selected on system implementation. Be specific and provide examples. (1 paragraph)
- Explain whether or not the policy or regulation you selected will impact improvement in outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow. (1 paragraphs)
- Describe organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at your healthcare organization to address the improvement in outcomes and efficiencies by the policy or regulation you selected. Be specific. (1 paragraph)

TN006: Policy and Regulation Supporting Informatics and Technology Integration: Evaluate legislative policies and regulations for health and nursing informatics and their impact on improvement for outcomes and efficiencies in nursing practice.

Assessment Rubric

Rubric Criteria 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

Module 1: Policies and Regulations Impacting the Implementation of Health Information Technology

Create a 1-page fact sheet that your healthcare organization could hypothetically use to explain a health or nursing informatics policy/regulation that you selected. Your fact sheet should address the following:

 Briefly and generally explain the policy or regulation selected.

Learning Objective 1.1 – Analyze legislative policies and regulations for health/nursing informatics

A completed and properly formatted fact sheet is missing. The response explaining the legislative policy or regulation for health/nursing informatics selected is missing.

An incomplete, inaccurate, or vague fact sheet is provided that may align to some proper formatting. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the legislative policy or regulation for health/nursing informatics selected.

A completed, accurate, and properly formatted fact sheet is provided. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the legislative policy or regulation for health/nursing informatics selected.

 Explain the impact of the policy or regulation selected on system implementation. Be specific and provide examples.

The response explaining the impact of the policy or regulation selected for health/nursing informatics on system implementation is missing.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the impact of the policy or regulation selected for health/nursing informatics on system implementation.

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the impact of the policy or regulation selected for health/nursing informatics on system implementation.

Rubric Criteria 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

Learning Objective 1.2 – Analyze the impact of legislative policies and regulations for health/nursing informatics on system implementation

The response minimally synthesizes and integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

Module 2: The Role of Regulation for Improving Outcomes and Efficiency With Technology

 Explain whether or not the policy or regulation selected will impact improvement in outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.

Learning Objective 2.1 – Evaluate impact of legislative policies and regulations on outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow

The response explaining whether or not the policy or regulation selected will impact improvement in outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow is missing.

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains whether or not the policy or regulation selected will impact improvement in outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail whether or not the policy or regulation selected will impact improvement in outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow.

 Describe organizational policies and procedures that are/will be in place at a healthcare organization to address the improvement in outcomes and efficiencies

The response describing policies and procedures in healthcare organizations that are/will be in place to address the improvement in outcomes and efficiencies by

The response inaccurately or vaguely describes policies and procedures in healthcare organizations that are/will be in place to address the improvement in outcomes

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the policies and procedures in healthcare organizations that are/will be in place to address the improvement in

Rubric Criteria 0

Not Present 1

Needs Improvement 2

Meets Expectations

by the policy or regulation selected. Be specific and provide examples.

Learning Objective 2.1 – Analyze policies and procedures in healthcare organizations to support improvement in outcomes and efficiencies by legislative policies or regulations

the policy or regulation selected is missing.

and efficiencies by the policy or regulation selected. The response may provide accurate examples that partially support the policies and procedures for the healthcare organization. The response minimally synthesizes and integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

outcomes and efficiencies by the policy or regulation selected. The response provides specific, credible, and detailed examples that support the policies and procedures for the healthcare organization. The response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources and two competency-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

Mastery Rubric No Yes

Exceeds Expectations: Policy and Regulation Supporting Informatics and Technology Integration

Learning Objective – Evaluate legislative policies and regulations for health and nursing informatics and their

A fully developed and properly formatted fact sheet is not provided and fails to synthesize a health/nursing informatics policy or regulation and does not comprehensively detail the impact of the

A fully developed and properly formatted fact sheet is provided that synthesizes a health/nursing informatics policy or regulation and comprehensively details the impact of the policy

impact on improvement for outcomes and efficiencies in nursing practice

policy or regulation on system implementation and potential improvements in outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow. The fact sheet does not comprehensively describe policies and procedures in healthcare organizations that fully support the improvements in outcomes and efficiencies promoted by the health/nursing informatics policy or regulation examined.

or regulation on system implementation and potential improvements in outcomes and efficiencies for clinical care, patient/provider interactions, and workflow. The fact sheet also comprehensively describes policies and procedures in healthcare organizations that fully support the improvements in outcomes and efficiencies promoted by the health/nursing informatics policy or regulation examined.

Professional Skill Assessment

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

PS001: Written Communication: Demonstrate graduate-level writing skills.

Learning Objective PS 1.1: Use proper grammar, spelling, and mechanics.

Multiple major and minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are highly distracting and seriously impact readability.

Multiple minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics are distracting and negatively impact readability.

Writing reflects competent use of standard edited American English. Errors in grammar, spelling, and/or mechanics do not negatively impact readability.

Learning Objective PS 1.2: Organize writing to enhance clarity.

Writing is poorly organized and incoherent. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions are missing or inappropriate.

Writing is loosely organized. Limited use of introductions, transitions, and conclusions provides partial continuity.

Writing is generally well-organized. Introductions, transitions, and conclusions provide continuity and a logical progression of ideas.

Professional Skill Assessment

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

Learning Objective PS 1.3: Apply APA style to written work.

APA conventions are not applied.

APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are applied inconsistently.

APA conventions for attribution of sources, structure, formatting, etc., are generally applied correctly in most instances. Sources are generally cited appropriately and accurately.

Learning Objective PS 1.4: Use appropriate vocabulary and tone for the audience and purpose.

Vocabulary and tone are inappropriate and negatively impact clarity of concepts to be conveyed.

Vocabulary and tone have limited relevance to the audience.

Vocabulary and tone are generally appropriate for the audience and support communication of key concepts.

PS005: Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: Use critical-thinking and problem-solving skills to analyze professional issues and inform best practice.

Learning Objective PS 5.1: Analyze assumptions and fallacies.

Analysis of assumptions is missing.

Response is weak in assessing the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument. Response does not adequately identify and discuss the implications of fallacies or logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Response generally assesses the reasonableness of assumptions in a given argument. Response identifies and discusses the implications of fallacies and/or logical weaknesses in a given argument.

Learning Objective PS 5.2: Generate reasonable and appropriate assumptions.

Assumptions are missing. Response does not adequately present and discuss key assumptions in an original argument.

Response presents and discusses key assumptions in an original argument.

Professional Skill Assessment

0 Not Present

1 Needs Improvement

2 Meets Expectations

Learning Objective PS 5.3: Assess multiple perspectives and alternatives.

Assessment of multiple perspectives is missing.

Response does not identify nor adequately consider multiple perspectives or alternatives.

Response identifies and considers multiple perspectives and alternatives.

Learning Objective PS 5.4: Use problem-solving skills.

Problems and solutions are not identified.

Response presents solutions, but they are ineffective in addressing the specific problem.

Response presents solutions that are practical and work in addressing the specific problem.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Policy And Regulation Supporting Informatics And Technology Integration appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

Race Crime & Masculinities Essay Questions

June 15, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

Race Crime & Masculinities Essay Questions

Length 12-15 (not counted cover page, references)

NB! Answer Only One of three Questions

Masculinity is never a tactic of finish product they are influenced by the gender ideals that we have come to except as proper (1993:67).

1) What are some of the reasons that some men might engage in violent crime to establish or prove their “masculinity. In answering, consider how power shapes masculinity in society. Patricia Hill-Collins (2005) and Michelle Alexander (2010) see Black men as situated near the bottom of the masculine hierarchy while white man predominately have the power this creates both subordinated and marginalized masculinities is driven by notions of racialized masculine identities (hooks, 2003 B). Connell criticizes the social scientist who failed to recognize race within masculinity and does concede that racialized identities within masculinity under theorized (Connell and Messerschmidt, 2005). Patricia Hill-Collins (2005) and bell hooks (2003b) view hegemonic masculinity as the basis for subordination and marginalization of Black men and their masculinities.

2) How does the policing (law enforcement and communal) of Black masculinities shape their construction of gender and sexuality among its potential targets, within Black communities?

3) According to Connell (1987:183), male rape can be more meaningfully explained as an ascendant form of masculinity that subordinates femininity and some forms of masculinity”. You are to critically assess this statement in relation to all genders as offenders and victims of rape. Further, it is mandatory that you theoretically frame your response within frameworks that recognize the saliency of social identities, including but not limited to class, race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and ability. In answering, consider how power shapes masculinity in society. Patricia Hill-Collins (2005) and Michelle Alexander (2010) see Black men as situated near the bottom of the masculine hierarchy while white man predominately have the power this creates both subordinated and marginalized masculinities is driven by notions of racialized masculine identities (hooks, 2003 B). Connell criticizes the social scientist who failed to recognize race within masculinity and does concede that racialized identities within masculinity under theorized (Connell and Messerschmidt, 2005). Patricia Hill-Collins (2005) and bell hooks (2003b) view hegemonic masculinity as the basis for subordination and marginalization of Black men and their masculinities

Choose a total of (5) readings from the course, and use your chosen readings as examples of understanding race crime & masculinities.

The readings for this course share some basic premises: raced, gendered & hegemonic patriarchal masculinities influences mens actions and the way men perceive themselves, other men, children, LGBTQI persons and women.

Your essay is not a summary of any theorist or author’s work. Rather your essay should engage in a substantive way (employ and work with textual evidence) from select course readings/film/documentaries or other text/context you chose as a focal point for the paper. Read carefully and think before you write. Precision, depth and imagination, rather than volume (breadth), are what counts.

Finally, a good essay is like a road map. The introduction is a road map for their reader – professor – TA. A reader should be able to read the introduction to see if they want to take the trip/journey at all, and if so what they should expect along the way. Secondly, writing is a process that requires revision: revise, revise, revise!!! And, revision is far more than editing; by definition it is rethinking – strong expository writing is preceded by active, critical READING.

Few points to consider when peer reviewing students paper.

The essay outline as provided by the instructor.
You must include the eight (8) sections/parts/subheadings, think of it as your academic GPS.

1) Title (Cover page) page: 1

Title of your paper

Your Banner ID Number (e.g., 100123456).

Institutional Affiliation

Student legal name

2) Abstract: page 2

In 150-300 words or less, provide a brief summary of what your paper is about. In 150-300 words or less, provide a brief summary of what your paper is about. An abstract is an excerpted passage, brief, summary or short statement that describes your paper. It contains for example but not exclusive the theoretical framework, scope, purpose, methodology, results, and contents of the work. Does the abstract have keywords?

3) Introduction

Define the problem, its nature, scope, extent and importance!
Define the terms, theories, concepts to be used and why!
State how you plan to add new knowledge to the given topic.
4) Literature Review. This is another subheading or section.

Discuss the work of prior researchers. This means summarizing the work that others have done (of course, you may have to read additional literature that precedes 2000 to become familiar with the activists, theoretical and scholarly debate in the literature) and find a way to discuss the existing works thematically, conceptually, or methodologically.

How is prior work or theorists relevant to your current literature review?
Provide a synthesis and criticism of existing works (theoretical, conceptual, operational, methodological, and analytical).
What shortcomings (policy, law, procedures) and deficiencies exist in prior works?
It is not sufficient to simply inform the reader about the previous works. In other words, are the weakness or gaps in the authors arguments and line of thought.
A literature review is a way improving and building upon the work of other scholars. We are in the business of modifying the wheel, not reinventing it.
What remedies can you recommend improving the existing state of knowledge?
5) Claims/results/findings. This is another subheading or section.

What are your main findings/claims/arguments?
What arguments are you making?
What evidence are you providing in support of your argument and claim?
Findings should be presented in thematic categories.
6) General discussion and conclusion. This is another subheading or section.

Does your finding/argument contravene or contradict the findings of prior research?
Does your finding support the current knowledge about a given topic?
Discuss the implications of your work for researchers and policymakers.
Discuss the limitations of your own work.
Discuss what future policy research you would recommend!
7) References. This is on a separate page at the end of your paper, under the subheading references.

Use APA format: Please refer to the examples in the Concise Guide to APA Style, Seventh Edition, which is adapted by the American Psychological Association (APA) from its Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Seventh Edition. https://apastyle.apa.org/ (Links to an external site.)

If you want you can use these points or the above 7 sections for peer review

Do you define key Crime and Masculinities terms, phrases and associated concepts as we have used them in this course?
Does your thesis of paper reflect your grasp of key terms and concepts in this course?
Do you adequately explain the theories or ideas you are using from lectures in assigned readings in critical race theory?
Do you provide evidence for conclusion you reach in your paper?
What is supporting evidence appropriate and convincing?
Do you offer an interesting and thoughtful conclusion to your paper?
Do you have a number of grammatical punctuation and sentence structure errors? Are you critical in discussion your observations or do you just offer a summary?
You are articulating novel ideas and interpretations of the material, from refereed journals on Crime and Masculinities
The paper follows prescribed APA formatting
In addition you can consider what is the central claim of this paper, in your opinion?
What data did you find most convincing in this paper and why?
Which sections of the paper did find most confusing and what would make the section clearer?
Which sections of the paper do you feel the student should expand