Due Week 5 and worth 100 points

When
looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to
resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage
in this aspect of critical thinking.

The
assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you
read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org
Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine
your thoughts.
* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in
Chapter 2 of the webtext.

In Part
II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your
ideas.

Part II – Writing
Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:

State
your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1. Identify
(3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your
position and explain why you selected these specific reasons. Explain
your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3)
premises opposing your position from the Procon.org website. Examine
at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated
the premises for and against your position. Discuss
the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have
influenced your biases. Discuss
whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the
“Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the
same.

The
paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:

Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph. Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and
supporting sentences. Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation,
mechanics, and spelling.

Your
assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The
format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment
to review the SWS documentation for details. Based on the guidelines in SWS, “A well-researched
assignment has at least as many sources as pages.” Since this assignment
requires you to write at least 3-4 pages, you should include at least 3-4
references.

The
specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases
involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of language. Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in
critical thinking skills and informal logic.
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.