Screening for Disease in the Community”

Screening for DiseaseAlthough many individuals and organizations may endorse the goal of screening programs, the details and implementation are often controversial. For some types of screening, it can be quite challenging to weigh the human and economic costs and benefits and determine a clear recommendation. For instance, in an article in the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Michael Barry (2009) indicates that “serial PSA [prostate-specific–antigen] screening has at best a modest effect on prostate-cancer mortality during the first decade of follow-up. This benefit comes at the cost of substantial over-diagnosis and overtreatment. It is important to remember that the key question is not whether PSA screening is effective but whether it does more good than harm.”This week’s Learning Resources include articles about screening programs for four different diseases that contain potentially controversial recommendations. For this Discussion, you will select a disease and examine the epidemiological evidence to assess a recommendation for screening guidelines. In addition, you will consider possibilities for furthering policy to promote population health related to this disease.To prepare:Review the four articles concerned with screening and public policy listed in this week’s Learning Resources. All four articles contain potentially controversial recommendations for screening and prevention (See attached files for these articles).Select one article on which to focus for this Discussion.Analyze how the epidemiologic data could be used to formulate policy for improving population health.By tomorrow 04/17/2018 3pm, write a minimum of 550 words in APA format with at least 3 scholarly references from the list of required readings below. Include the level one headings as numbered below:Post a cohesive scholarly response that addresses the following:1) Summarize the recommendations of your selected article. Discuss ethical considerations and whether or not you believe the recommendations are justified.2) Describe the epidemiological evidence in support of your position.3) Identify whether the screening program you review is population-based or high-risk based and how that influences your assessment.4) How can the reported data be used to move policy forward for improving population health around this issue?Required ReadingsFriis, R. H., & Sellers, T. A. (2014). Epidemiology for public health practice (5th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.Chapter 10, “Data Interpretation Issues”Chapter 11, “Screening for Disease in the Community”Chapter 11 examines aspects of screening for disease, including characteristics of a good screening test and how screening programs can be evaluated.Nash, D. B., Fabius, R. J., Skoufalos, A., Clarke, J. L. & Horowitz, M. R. (2016). Population health: Creating a culture of wellness (2nd ed). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.Chapter 13, “Decision Support”This chapter addresses measurement and analysis tools used to support decision making for improvement, accountability, and research related to population health. The three main purposes of measurement in population health (improvement, accountability, research) provide the framework for this chapter.Note: You will need to review the following four articles to complete this week’s Discussion: (See attached file for the articles)U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2009). Screening for breast cancer. Retrieved from http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsbrca.htm (See attached File).This is a summary of the controversial USPSTF proposal regarding screening for breast cancer using mammography and breast self-examination. It includes the recommendations, rationale, and evidence supporting the proposal.Alvarez, G. G., Gushulak, B., Rumman, K. A., Altpeter, E., Chemtob, D., Douglas, P., … & Ellis, E. (2011). A comparative examination of tuberculosis immigration medical screening programs from selected countries with high immigration and low tuberculosis incidence rates. BMC Public Health, 11(3). Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/3 (See attached File).This article examines tuberculosis screening practices among migrants from high-incidence countries to low-incidence countries. Consider the benefits and challenges of standardizing screening requirements at the global level.Creighton, P., Lew, J.-B., Clements, M., Smith, M., Howard, K., Dyer, S., Lord, S., & Canfell, K. (2010). Cervical cancer screening in Australia: Modelled evaluation of the impact of changing the recommended interval from two to three years. BMC Public Health, 10, 734–747 (See attached File).This article examines the cost benefits and health consequences of screening for cervical cancer every 3 years as opposed to every 2 years. Researchers summarize other studies that support this change as well.Hugosson, J., Carlsson, S., Aus, G., Bergdahl, S., Khatami, A., Lodding, P., & … Lilja, H. (2010). Mortality results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial. Lancet Oncology, 11(8), 725–732 (See attached File).Prostate cancer screening can result in the detection of other cancers that may “never present during the patient’s lifetime (over-diagnosis) and it results in unnecessary treatments that can damage men’s quality of life (over-treatment).” However, this research study also demonstrates how prostate cancer screening also can reduces mortality rates in some instances.HealthMap. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.healthmap.org/enThis website tracks, maps, and describes current disease outbreaks around the world, along with sources of information about them. It provides a valuable picture of global public health issues.Association for Community Health Improvement. (2006). Planning, assessment, outcomes & evaluation resources. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20130709124030/http://www.communityhlth.org/communityhlth/resources/planning.htmlRequired MediaLaureate Education (Producer). (2012). Epidemiology and population health: Screening [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 8 minutes.In this week’s program, Dr. LaPorte discusses screening as it relates to epidemiology.Optional ResourcesFields, M. M., & Chevlen, E. (2006). Screening for disease: Making evidence-based choices. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 10(1), 73–76.Strong, K., Wald, N., Miller, A., & Alwan, A. (2005). Current concepts in screening for noncommunicable disease: World Health Organization Consultation Group Report on methodology of noncommunicable disease screening. Journal of Medical Screening, 12(1), 12–19.
Screening for Disease Although many individuals and organizations may endorse the goal of screening programs, the details and implementation are often controversial. ForRate this Solution

anxiety among american college students causes impacts and how to deal with

Title:

Anxiety among American college students; Causes, impacts and how to deal with

Discuss and expand how this topic enhance your intellectual, spiritual & social well-being and how can you apply it to your everyday life as you move on to higher level of learning.

A five (5) pages research paper. In MS Word format using 12pt font only, double- space, regular margin. The bibliography at the last page. The first and the last page are not included as the content of the five (5) pages. Use the APA style for quotation, references and citations.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post anxiety among american college students causes impacts and how to deal with appeared first on Essay Writers.

type up your description according to handout 1

Type up your description according to handout instructions.Written work should be in your own words

please please. So I will attach the handout so you can write about it. https://j.top4top.net/p_13379tn690.jpeg

* one page and double spaced in Full sentences

* Include and explain at least 3 features of Paleolithic life

* Extrapolates reasonable general theories about the people from the images

Finally it must be mentioned that these images are from which civilization

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post type up your description according to handout 1 appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

Socw 6361 week 11 | Social Science homework help

 

Week 11: Assessing Policy: Toward Evidence-Based Policy

Evidence-based policies are ones that achieve positive outcomes where they are evaluated with research.
—Bruce S. Jansson, Becoming an Effective Policy Advocate: From Policy Practice to Social Justice, 8th ed.

Social workers hope that a proposed policy will be effective and make a significant impact toward social change. However, as Jansson (2018) points out in the introductory quote, you will not know if your policy is effective until it has been evaluated with research and has a significant body of evidence that supports the policy’s goal.

In this final week of the course, you discuss evidence-based policies and evidence-based practices that support effective policies. In addition, you discuss the significant role that values play in determining the evaluation of specific policies. Finally, you also discuss the hard realization that even when policies and programs are evaluated and show great promise for effectiveness and success, they are not always enacted and implemented.

Learning Objectives

Students will:
  • Analyze influence of values on policy evaluation
  • Analyze practices of policy advocacy
  • Analyze advocacy roles of social workers

Learning Resources

Required Readings

SOCW 6361 Webliography
These websites will be required throughout the semester. Become familiar with these websites, especially when doing research for your assignments.

Community Toolbox. (2016). Chapter 8 Section 6: Obtaining feedback from constituents: What change is feasible? Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/structure/strategic-planning/obtain-constituent-feedback/main 

Community Toolbox. (2016). 12. Evaluating the Initiative. Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en/evaluating-initiative 

Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice  (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series.
Chapter 14, “Assessing Policy: Toward Evidence-Based Policy During Task 8” (pp. 488-503)

Midgley, J., & Livermore, M. M. (Eds.) (2008). The handbook of social policy (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Chapter 33, “The Future of Social Policy” (pp. 557–569) (PDF)

English, D. J., Brummel, S., & Martens, P. (2009). Fatherhood in the child welfare system: Evaluation of a pilot project to improve father involvement. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 3(3), 213–234.

Swank, E. W. (2012). Predictors of political activism among social work students. Journal of Social Work Education,48(2), 245–266.

Required Media

TEDx Talks. (2016, May 12). Problem-oriented policing: Where social work meets law enforcement: Derrick Jackson. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK8glFZuQw8

Optional Resources

MSW home page
Use this link to access the MSW home page, which provides resources for your social work program.

Discussion 1: Policies and the Influence of Values

Ideology, politics, and the influence of values often override evidence-based policy. When there is evaluation conflict, a policy advocate must be prepared to defend his/her reasons for wanting to implement a policy. Because almost all proposed policies are circumscribed by politics (for reasons brought up by Jansson throughout the course when discussing the subtleties of policy implementation), you should be prepared for some conflict, ranging from having your research ignored, to having the accuracy of your data questioned, to having your personal values brought into question.

In this Discussion, you consider the assertion that the evaluation of specific policies is often strongly influenced by values. You also examine and evaluate ways to mitigate evaluation conflict to defend the feasibility of your policy.

By Day 3

Post a response to Jansson’s assertion that evaluating specific policies is strongly influenced by values with respect to the case of the evaluation of special services. How do the values of evaluation conflict adhere to social work values? What practices would you use to defend the feasibility of and effectiveness of your evidence-based policy?

By Day 5

Respond to a colleague with a discussion of why the evaluation of policies is often controversial and political and how the values of evaluation conflict adhere to social work values. What policy advocacy skills can social workers use to ensure that appropriate evaluations are being conducted on policies?

Response 

 Anna Lear RE: Discussion 1 – Week 11COLLAPSE

Social workers must be cautious and diligent to check personal bias when working with clients or advocating for positive social change.  Evaluation must be put through this same process.

In advocating for social change, the use of value based power and expert power are two essential tools necessary to identify and develop evidence based policy to advocate for change (Jansson, 2018).

Reference

Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice. (8th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning Series.

Thank you

Anna Lear

Response 

Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 11 Discussion 1 Rubric

Post by Day 3 and Respond by Day 5

To participate in this Discussion:
Week 11 Discussion 1

Discussion 2: Becoming a Lifelong Advocate

It is not enough to be compassionate. You must act.
—Tenzin Gyatso

As this course comes to a close, consider and reflect on how you can become a lifelong advocate for social change in your future social work practice. As a motivated policy advocate and social worker, your actions in your chosen profession will reflect your motivation to help relatively powerless, disenfranchised groups of people improve their resources, their opportunities, and their quality of life.

In this Discussion, you reflect upon your responsibility as a social worker, politically and professionally.

By Day 4

Post your thoughts on this question: As a social worker, what is your responsibility to engage in political action? Identify an area of social welfare where social work policy advocacy is needed.

By Day 6

Respond to a colleague with suggestions on how he or she can put his or her policy advocacy into action. Discuss which policy advocacy skills you can use as a social worker in all levels of practice.

Response

 Surnita Warner RE: Discussion 2 – Week 11COLLAPSE

Post your thoughts on this question: As a social worker, what is your responsibility to engage in political action?

The primary mission of the social work profession is to enhance human well-being and help meet the basic needs of all people, with particular attention to those who are vulnerable, oppressed, and living in poverty.(NASW, 2017) In providing this enhancement, Social Workers may have to pursue a change. These changes are social, which include working with politicians to change policies to benefit the well-being of the vulnerable population. As a Social worker, our responsibility to engage in political actions is to advocate for change by challenging social injustice. These actions include writing letters to politicians, surveying the community, and or making the media aware of the changes needed for the populations that are lacking resources.

 Identify an area of social welfare where social work policy advocacy is needed.

An area of social welfare, where social work policy advocacy is needed is in the homeless population. Currently, this population has been identified as vulnerable and lacking resources during this COVID- 19 pandemic. As the medical field has recommended masks to wear and to remain 6 feet away to refrain from receiving COVID-19, the homeless population lacks the resources to acquire masks. Therefore, the homeless population chances of receiving this worldwide disease is increased.

References

NASW. (2017)“Read the Code of Ethics: Ethical Principles.” www.socialworkers.org, 2019, 

www.socialworkers.org/About/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics/Code-of-Ethics-English.