For this assessment, you will identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest associated with adverse quality and safety outcomes (for example, an increase in the incidence of falls or medical errors) and analyze the gap between current and desired performance

/in /by

For this assessment, you will identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest associated with adverse quality and safety outcomes (for example, an increase in the incidence of falls or medical errors) and analyze the gap between current and desired performance

Your quality and safety gap analysis will provide the basis for the remaining assessments in this course. Preparation As a nurse leader, you are fully aware of the hazardous nature of health care and that organizations must continually seek to improve the quality and safety of the care they provide to patients. For this assessment, you will identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest associated with adverse quality and safety outcomes (for example, an increase in the incidence of falls or medical errors) and analyze the gap between current and desired performance. Requirements ‹Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide. Be sure that your written analysis addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Quality and Safety Gap Analysis (linked in the Resources) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed. Conducting the Analysis Identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest that contributes to adverse quality and safety outcomes. Propose specific practice changes that will improve quality and safety outcomes and bridge the gap between current and desired performance. Prioritize proposed practice changes. Determine how proposed practice changes will foster a culture of quality and safety. Determine how a particular organizational culture or hierarchy might affect quality and safety outcomes. Justify necessary changes with respect to functions, processes, or behaviors, specific to your organization. Writing and Supporting Evidence Communicate analysis data and information clearly and accurately, using correct grammar and mechanics. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Additional Requirements Format your document using APA style. Use the APA Paper Template linked in the resources. Be sure to include: A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required. A running head on all pages. Appropriate section headings. Properly-formatted citations and references. Your analysis should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.

 

The post For this assessment, you will identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest associated with adverse quality and safety outcomes (for example, an increase in the incidence of falls or medical errors) and analyze the gap between current and desired performance appeared first on nursing assignment tutor.

You have the choice between the Bolshevik Revolution or the Cold War

/in /by

Concept notes are a synthesising note on a key concept, idea, or event. A concept note is a useful form of assessment because it allows students to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of a key term relating to their studies in a succinct and to-the-point manner. It is recommended that you choose a topic or term relevant to your essay. This will link your research and planning for your concept note and your essay. The work on your concept note will also provide you with some important material for your final essay.

For example, a concept note on the Bolshevik revolution as one of the most significant events of the 20th century might include, but not limited to, the following two key parts:

A brief account of the Bolshevik revolution, i.e. a brief statement on what this event was and its course

A brief discussion of the scholarly accounts of and/or debates on the causes and consequences of the revolution in terms of its impact on world politics during the short twentieth century.

A few concluding statements providing your own view on the historical significance of the revolution in light of your preceding discussion.

Concept notes are relatively short pieces of writing, but this can be deceptive. You will find you need to read widely, develop a concise style, and possibly produce several drafts of your concept note to achieve what is required. 

Please stick to 500 words for the word count and add 2-3% plagiarism as usual.

Your understanding of the “bystander” approach

/in /by

bareghamyan
View this TED Talk on violence against women and then answer the following questions:

What is your understanding of the “bystander” approach?
Explain an incident you have witnessed or participated in that demonstrates the “bystander” approach mentioned in this video.

Sample Solution

The post Your understanding of the “bystander” approach appeared first on homework handlers.

Should Marihuana be legalized?

/in /by

This essay is divided into two Parts: Assignment 1.1 is past due, I have an extension which is due August 1. –
Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part I – Prewriting
When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own
point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing
Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an
opposing view on an issue.
The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
In Part I of the assignment Saturday, , you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The
Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. Next, you will review the
Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your
thoughts.
Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your
ideas.
Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere
to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.

  1. Select one (1) of the approved topics from the www.procon.org Website and state your position on the issue.
  2. From the Procon.org Website, identify three (3) premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con
    section – whichever section opposes your position.
  3. For each of the three (3) premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these
    “believing” questions suggested by Elbow:
    a. What’s interesting or helpful about this view?
    b. What would I notice if I believed this view?
    c. In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?”
    The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:
    • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
    • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
    • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
    Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
    • This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS).
    • This prewriting assignment has no page requirement. There is no requirement at this time to include
    references in the assignment.
    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
    • Identify the informal fallacies, assumptions, and biases involved in manipulative appeals and abuses of
    language. Create written work utilizing the concepts of critical thinking.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in critical thinking skills and informal logic
    Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part II Synthesizing and Writing
    When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own
    point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.
    The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.
    For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a critical thinking process: “The Believing Game and How
    to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” by Peter Elbow. , reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to
    gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.
  • Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.
    In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.
    Part II – Writing
    Write at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
  1. State your position on the topic you selected for Assignment 1.1.
  2. Identify (3) three premises (reasons) from the Procon.org website that support your position and explain why
    you selected these specific reasons.
  3. Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three (3) premises opposing your position from
    the Procon.org website.
  4. Examine at least two (2) types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and
    against your position.
  5. Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
  6. Discuss whether or not your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the
    “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same. 
    The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:
    • Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
    • Address main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
    • Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
    • Based on the guidelines in SWS, “A well-researched assignment has at least as many sources as pages.”
    Since this assignment requires you to write at least 3-4 pages, you should include at least 3-4 references.

Sample Solution

The post Should Marihuana be legalized? appeared first on homework handlers.