Explain whether, given the system goals, requirements, and scope as they are currently understood, is the project schedule reasonable

COIT20248 Information Systems Analysis and Design Assignment 1 – About Systems Development

COIT20248 Information Systems Analysis and Design Assignment 1 – About Systems Development
Due date:
Week 6 Friday (22nd December 2017) 08:00 PM AEST ASSESSMENT
Weighting: 30%
Length: 1500 words (+/- 10%) 1
Objectives
This assessment relates to course learning outcomes 1, 2, 3 and 4 stated in the e-course profile.
Assessment 1 is an individual assessment. In assessment 1, you are assigned tasks which assess your course knowledge gained between weeks 1 and 5 about different facets of systems development. All students will have to write a report showing the answers to the questions in tasks 1-5 below.
Please note that ALL submitted A2-reports are passed through a computerized copy detection system and it is extremely easy for teaching staff to identify copied or otherwise plagiarised work.
• Copying (plagiarism) can incur penalties ranging from deduction of marks to failing the course or even exclusion from the University.
• Please ensure you are familiar with the Academic Misconduct Procedures, available from:
http://policy.cqu.edu.au/Policy/policy_file.do?policyid=1244
The tasks
For the purpose of this assignment, you are assumed to be one of the software consultants appointed to shoulder the system analysis responsibilities in, Global Business Systems in the project outlined in the case study.
You will plan and manage the project as well as investigate and document its system requirements. For your Assignment 1 submission, you will produce a report that discusses this project based on your understanding of it and the related investigation results through the tasks below.
Task 1: (10 marks)
Approaches to Systems Development
• How would Brisbane Multi Faith Temple go about developing its information systems? (5 Marks)
• Justify your choice of your selected approach to systems development. (5 Marks)
Task 2: (15 Marks)
Systems Requirements
• What are the primary functional requirements for the system in the case study? (10 Marks)
• What are the non-functional requirements for the system in the case study? (5 Marks)
Task 3: (15 Marks)
Project Cost Benefit Analysis
• Discuss your Project Cost Benefit Analysis. (7.5 Marks)
• Provide an excel spread sheet with details in a Project Cost Benefit Analysis. (7.5 Marks)
Task 4: (20 Marks)
Project Schedule
• Show a work breakdown structure and a project schedule as a Gantt Chart. Explain both of them and discuss how they relate to each other. (10 Marks)
• Given the system goals, requirements, and scope as they are currently understood, is the project schedule reasonable? Why or why not? (10 Marks)
Task 5: (25 Marks)
System Information Requirement Investigation Techniques
• Who are the stakeholders involved? (5 Marks)
• Explain your choice of the 3 most useful investigation techniques. (10 Marks)
• Justify the usefulness of these 3 investigation techniques. (10 Marks)
The Report (Important: The report makes up 100 marks – scaled to 30%)
You will produce a report that aims to explain your systems analysis results as per the layout and submission guidelines mentioned below.
Report Layout and Submission Guidelines
In the template file “COIT 20248 Assessment1TemplateFile” (in MS Word) provided to you, the report for ‘Systems Development’ has been organised using the following headings and guidelines.
Students are advised to observe the word count in each section when developing the report.
• Title Cover Page with clear details of course title/name, student number/name, lecturer & tutor (Provided in template file)
• Introduction (Provided in template file) *about 100 words o Introduction must clearly define the aims of the report.
o Introduction must identify the project objectives.
• The Approach to Systems Development – Task 1 *about 250 words
o How would Brisbane Multi Faith Temple go about developing its information systems?
o Justification for your chosen approach to system development
• Systems Requirements – Task 2. *about 250 words
o List the primary functional requirements for the system in the case study.
o List the non-functional requirements for the system in the case study. • Project Cost /Benefit Analysis – Task 3 *about 200 words
• Project Schedule – Task 4 *about 200 words
o Show work breakdown structure in the project as well as the project schedule Gantt Chart?
What are they and how do they relate to each other?
o Given the system goals, requirements, and scope as they are currently understood, is the project schedule reasonable? Why or why not?
• System Information Requirement Investigation Techniques – Task 5. *about 250 words
o List the stakeholders involved.
o Explain your choice of the 3 most useful investigation techniques.
o Justify the usefulness of these 3 investigation techniques.
• Reflections and Conclusions *about 100 words
o Present your reflections about this project (e.g. achievement and constraints). o Provide a brief summary of your findings
• References (must complete by showing 1 or more references with their related in-text citations)
Note: The recommended number of word in each section in the report is to be used as a rough guide.
Help
To help student members communicate, forums have been created for your use on the course Moodle website for Assessments 1 and 2. Please use them to help you work through your report.
Help on writing reports is contained in the Faculty Guide for Students – Chapter 4 – available here:
http://www.cqu.edu.au/ data/assets/pdf_file/0003/2289/Extract-of-Chapter-3.pdf
You may also benefit from a video supplied by the CQUniversity Academic Learning Centre available here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0v9ekxeoko
Assessment criteria – Assignment 1 marking guide
Marks for Assignment 1 will be allocated as follows:
TOPIC Weight Mark
Introduction (5 marks)
Clearly defines the aims of the report
Identifies the project objectives. 2.5
2.5
Approach to Systems Development – Task 1 (10 Marks)
• How would Brisbane Multi Faith Temple go about developing its information systems?
• Justify your choice of approach to systems development. 5
5
Systems Requirements – Task 2 (15 Marks)
• What are the primary functional requirements for the system in the case study?
• What are the non-functional requirements for the system in the case study? 10
5
Project Cost Benefit Analysis – Task 3 (15 Marks)
• Discuss your Project Cost Benefit Analysis
• Provide an excel spread sheet with details in a Project Cost Benefit Analysis 7.5
7.5
Project Schedule – Task 4 (20 Marks)
• Provide the project work breakdown structure & schedule – Gantt Chart
• Explain whether, given the system goals, requirements, and scope as they are currently understood, is the project schedule reasonable? Why or why not?
10
10
System Information Requirement Investigation Techniques – Task 5 (25
Marks)
• Who are the stakeholders involved?
• Explain your choice of the 3 most useful investigation techniques.
• Justify the usefulness of these 3 investigation techniques.
5
10
10
Reflections and Conclusions (5 marks)
• Present your reflections about this project (e.g. achievement and constraints).
• Briefly summarize your findings. 2.5
2.5
References 5
TOTAL: 100
Assessment mark will be weighted to 30%.


 

. WITH BEST NURSING TUTORS .

get-your-custom-paper

The post Explain whether, given the system goals, requirements, and scope as they are currently understood, is the project schedule reasonable appeared first on BEST NURSING TUTORS .

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Explain whether, given the system goals, requirements, and scope as they are currently understood, is the project schedule reasonable appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

His 105 discussion

In the period 1940-1945, the US would go into a “war economy” that dramatically impacted the American economy and society.

The war economy helped to reduce unemployment as American males were drafted and deployed to war, females stepped up to take their positions in factories and manufacturing jobs.  This helped to change the perception of females in the workforce and what the role of women in society were.  Long term it spurred women to remain in the workforce and not be satisfied with staying home and just being homemakers.  Long term it provided more validity to women in the workplace and striving for equality as well.

Explanation:

The war economy helped to reduce unemployment as American males were drafted and deployed to war, females stepped up to take their positions in factories and manufacturing jobs.  This helped to change the perception of females in the workforce and what the role of women in society were.  Long term it spurred women to remain in the workforce and not be satisfied with staying home and just being homemakers.  Long term it provided more validity to women in the workplace and striving for equality as well.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post His 105 discussion appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

Improving Public Health Informatics

Consider the following business case study on Improving Public Health Informatics. As a competent project manager working for a consulting company, the Program manager has called you in for advice on the current project communication plan. Please bear in mind that you are acting independently, and as an experienced PM write a report on the following points:

  1. Report your assessment of the current project communication plan.
  2. Compare your assessment with sound project management practices.
  3. Recommend a communication plan for future project involving stakeholders from different sectors
  4. Justify your recommendation

Case Study: Improving Public Health Informatics

In the event of a major disease outbreak, senior managers need to respond in a timely fashion. To be able to do so, one needs to have all the latest information and data to make an appropriate decision. The County Health Department (CHD) ’ s strategic plan specifies increasing capacities for the program evaluation and response to major communicable disease outbreaks. Senior managers have identified the need to improve informatics capacity as an important step toward meeting these goals.

Currently, each community health services program of CHD has information systems that effectively track specific information for their assigned work. However, the systems were designed reactively without considering future expansions or an updated public health data plan. Each data base is almost a standalone system. While the state data bases are linked to CHD ’ s data bases, the environmental data bases are not linked with communicable disease data bases. Representatives from the Tuberculosis (TB) program, for example, had to enter identical client information in four different places. Moreover, the state mandates the public health department report the health conditions of its citizens and control infectious diseases. In order for this to happen, one needs informatics systems that are capable of tracking infectious diseases and reporting all investigations in a timely manner.

While the benefits of an integrated data base stand out, most employees in CHD are reluctant to change, particularly with regard to adopting and using a new technology as evidenced by the implementations of the EMR systems and other specifically designed data bases. To ensure success of the implementation, the project manager must provide relevant information to the stakeholders on a regular basis. This case focuses on project communication management, especially within the communication plan.

THE BIG PROJECT:

It all began when a new epidemiologist, hired by CHD, articulated the need to have an integrated public

health informatics system. With the new system, the reporting of infectious diseases as well as possible future outbreaks could be done in a timely fashion. The decision makers can then make an appropriate decision.

 

The communicable disease section of the county health department has taken the lead in championing this

project. The team includes two IT engineers and the epidemiologist, who will be overseeing the project. The team is responsible for gathering business processes and information system requirements, working closely with stakeholders, and at the same time, training IT engineers using the best practices developed by the Public Health Informatics Institute (PHII). The project duration is expected to be from six to twelve months

 

and the team will provide monthly updates as well as ad hoc updates whenever specific information is needed by the stakeholders.

 

The team has extensive experience in working together on previous successful projects such as the EMR implementation, EPIC implementation, and the communicable disease data bases ’ state wide expansion. It is the team’s firm belief that this project, to integrate a variety of data bases into a system that can communicate to one another, is doable.

 

PM: The initial idea of this project was formulated several years ago but it did not get the support it needed. Now we are bringing it back to life. And I know that you guys (IT engineers) are in favour of it and are ready to take the lead in this, with interoperability and data sharing in mind, while at the same time conforming to Public Health Informatics Institute ’ s best practices.

 

Dan: Correct. However, I am wondering who is going to fund this project as the health department is struggling and currently lacks the necessary resources.

 

PM: There is a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) which is affiliated with the Public Health Informatics Institute who specifically funds the struggling local health department ’ s public health information systems to meet their daily operational needs. I am going to put together the grant proposal and I need inputs from you guys.

Tim: Let me know what you need.

Dan: Do we have full support of the department leadership this time?

PM: Yes, this time we have the absolute support of the entire leadership team. However, we have to make

sure that we keep them updated with project status. In fact, learning from past projects, communication is very important for system implementation. We have to make sure that we communicate well with all project stakeholders.

Tim: I agree.  But, all stakeholders? That will be tough.

COLLABORATIVE PROCESS AND COMMUNICATION PLAN

To engage project stakeholders, the team followed a collaborative process (Figure 10.3 ). By following the process, external and internal stakeholders understood the information system’s support role as well as how it worked. The team also developed a communication plan and used it to avoid communication breakdown and, more importantly, to ensure that appropriate correspondence existed between all stakeholders in the project.  An example of the communication plan is shown in Table 10.4

Figure 10.3 The Collaborative Methodology Process

Table 10.4 Communication Plan

Ref: CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT, PROGRAM, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT Dragan Z.

Milosevic, Peerasit Patanakul & Sabin Srivannaboon Copyright 0 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.

Marking criteria:

Example of marking criteria is shown in following table. Marks are allocated as follows:

Note: The Marking Criteria Varies For Each Assignment

Section to be included in the report Description of the section Marks
Introduction Executive summary and background of the case study 5
 Case Study Assessment

 

 

1.       Report on the current

communication Plan

 

 

 

2.       Communication Plan assessment Vs project management

practice

  

 

 

Discuss if the communication plan adopted in this project is realistic enough in terms of communicating to all stakeholders of the project.

 

 

 

Comparison of assessment from the case study and project management practices.

  

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

Recommendation Publicly run projects are quite different from privately run projects. Recommend different communications plan that would be needed in a project involving stakeholder from different sectors, example unions, government agencies, contractors etc.. opposed to a private organization project. 10
Evaluate/justification justification of your proposed communication plan recommendation 5
Conclusion Write summary of the report 5
Reference style Follow IEEE reference style 5
Total 50

 

 

Example Marking Rubric for Assignment #: Total Marks 50

Note: The Marking Rubrics Varies For Each Assignment

Grade Mark HD40-50 DI 35-44 CR 30-34 P 25-29 Fail<25
Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Introduction 

/5

All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated Topics are relevant and soundly analysed. Generally relevant and analysed. Some relevance and briefly presented. This is not relevant to the assignment topic.
Identification 

/10

Demonstratedexcellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately Demonstrat ed excellent ability to think critically but did not source reference material appropriately Demonstratedability to think

critically and sourced reference material appropriately

Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately Did notdemonstrate

ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Analyse 

/10

Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed
Design 

/10

All elements are present and very well integrated. Components present with good cohesive Components present and mostly well integrated Most components present Proposal lacks structure.
Evaluate/justific ation 

 

/5

Excellent use of creditable sources. Accurate referencing. Obvious thatoutstanding effort

made

Extremely good effort Good effort made but not outstanding Made someeffort. For

example, Web searches only

Very little attempt to reference. Lazy effort with inaccuracies
Conclusion 

/5

Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments Consistency logical and convincing Mostly consistent logical and convincing Adequate cohesion and conviction Argument is confused and disjointed
Reference style 

/5

Clear styles with excellent source of references. Clear referencing style Generally good referencing style Sometimesclear referencing style Lacks consistency with many errors

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Improving Public Health Informatics appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

Provide examples of experimental and nonexperimental research design

nursingessayswriters.com is a leading academic writing agency created to offer exclusive writing services to students. As our name suggests, we offer cheap academic writing services to nursing students from all parts of the world.

We offer a wide range of academic writing services from admission essays and term papers to nursing research proposals, theses, and dissertation services. All writers at nursingessayswriters.com are academically qualified with a strong foundation in the field of medicine.