eddd 8014 wk3 write a job description posting

You will use best practices to expand the applicant pool for under-represented and culturally diverse individuals.

To complete this Assignment you will:

  • Write a job description/posting that specifically cultivates under-represented and culturally diverse applicants.
  • Design interview questions and script the interview process as interviewees are brought in for a panel interview.
  • Describe how you utilize teacher leaders in their content area/grade level to add skills to the team that would help move the instructional process forward while creating buy-in about onboarding new members to the staff.
  • Describe what is said at the conclusion of the interview.
  • Identify how to follow up with the checking of references, questions to ask, calling the interviewee and offering the job.
  • Design the onboarding process for someone new to your organization, division/campus, etc.
  • The assignment should be 4–6 pages

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post eddd 8014 wk3 write a job description posting appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

Philosophy intro to ethics – multiple questions

I need answer for those 20 multiple choices questions for philosophy into ethics: 

 

 

 

 

Question 1 What is David Barash defining when he says, “the total of [living things’] reproductive success through their offspring plus that of their relatives”?

 

inclusive fitness

 

natural selection

 

 

adaptation by sociable behavior

 

Darwin’s theory of kin mutation

 

 

Question 2

When discussing whether two individuals will reciprocate altruism, Barash points out three important factors: benefit to the recipient of the act, cost to the altruist of the act, and what?

 

Whether the act is against any moral rules.

 

Whether the act is against the law.

 

 

Whether the recipient and the altruist are related or not.

 

Whether the altruist has been altruistic to cheaters or not.

 

 

Question 3

Which of the following is NOT a conclusion that Ashworth draws from the experience of trench warfare in World War I?

 

Soldiers on both sides would use unofficial truces as traps to kill each other

 

Soldiers on both sides would often violate direct orders in refraining from engaging with the enemy.

 

 

French and German soldiers extended empathy to each other in their exchanges.

 

Unofficial truces were a kind of reciprocal altruism.

 

 

Question 4

Does Malinowski’s report on “The Kula Ring” confirm the idea of reciprocal altruism?

 

No, because the New Guineans who take part in it are possessive, and only want to accumulate the necklaces and bracelets.

 

No, because the the Kula Ring has actually fragmented New Guinena society.

 

 

Yes, because the New Guineans sacrifice their youngest child when they receive the wrong kinds of bracelets.

 

Yes, because the Kula Ring has social, linguistic and cultural benefits beyond the trade in necklaces and bracelets.

 

Question 5

Which of the following ancient sources of ethics teaches “An eye for an eye?”

 

 

The Law of Hammurabi

 

Confucius

 

 

Question 6

Robert Trivers theorizes that early humans (hominids) evolved reciprocal altruistic behaviors because of their long lifespan and degree of mutual dependence. What do these two factors have in common?

 

They are both likely to help hominids survive during glacial periods.

 

They increase the number of times that hominids interact with each other, thus increasing the likelihood of remembering and reacting to past interactions.

 

 

They decrease the number of times that hominids interact with each other, thus decreasing the likelihood of remembering and reacting to past interactions.

 

They make it less likely that hominids will develop a faculty for recognizing each other.

 

 

Question 7

According to Trivers, if an individual is a “gross cheater” in a system of interactions characterized by reciprocal altruism, what is likely to happen to him or her?

 

He or she is likely to switch to subtle cheating long before they are found out.

 

He or she is likely to become the leader of that group.

 

 

He or she will be trusted because most humans are too stupid to understand when cheating occurs.

 

He or she will not be trusted and will be “exiled” in some way from interactions.

 

 

Question 8

What is “TIT FOR TAT”?

 

A strategy for resolving the Prisoner’s Dilemma

 

A strategy that involves “mirroring” whatever a game opponent did on their last move.

 

 

A game strategy that involves a pattern of 5 cooperations followed by 3 defections.

 

Both A and B above.

 

Question 9

Hume’s “naturalistic fallacy” is the idea that

 

…it is always wrong to derive an “ought” statement from a statement describing what “is” the case.

 

…it is always wrong to derive a descriptive statement about what “is” the case from what we believe “ought” to be the case.

 

 

…morality is based purely on sentiments and feelings.

 

…morality is based purely on rational calculations.

 

Question 10

What is Kant referring to when he says, “[it] is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes or because of its adequacy to achieve some proposed end; it is good only because of its willing, i.e. it is good of itself.”

 

The moral sense.

 

The moral emotions.

 

 

 

Question 11

Hume, like Rousseau, thinks that our capacity for sympathy is basic to our moral life. According to Kant, when we perform our obligations because we are sympathetic to others, which of the following is true?

 

He agrees with Hume and Rousseau that we are good to act from sympathy.

 

Our actions have derivative (partial) moral worth.

 

 

Our actions have no moral worth whatsoever.

 

We have acted in a rational way.

 

Question 12

By calling certain principles of ethics “axioms,” utilitarian Henry Sidgwick wants to imply that they are…

 

…false.

 

…absolutely obligatory.

 

 

…self-evident to all.

 

…applicable only to one’s own culture.

 

Question 13

Edward Westermarck thinks that, by and large, most of us in a givern society agree on most moral truths. Where there is difference, he says, there is…

 

…a difference in knowledge of relevant facts.

 

…a difference in how “reflective” some people are versus others.

 

 

…a difference in emotional constitution.

 

all of the above.

 

 

 

Question 14

Does reason play a common-sense role in ethics? Thomas Nagel believes that when someone injures us or steals from us, more than our feelings are hurt. What does he believe, beyond this?

 

That the person who injured or stole from us had a reason not to do what they did.

 

That the person who injured or stole from us had no reason to do what they did.

 

 

That the person who injured or stole from us mistakenly thought they were following their duty, as in Kant’s view.

 

That the person who injured or stole from us was merely acting out of emotional hysteria.

 

Question 15

Virginia Held believes that hitching moral truth to reason is basically a man’s invention. What, instead, does she favor as the bases for a feminist ethic?

 

Emotion and embodied feeling.

 

Women’s history.

 

 

Laws favoring womens’ control of their own bodies.

 

She has no such bases; she only makes a criticism of “male-biased” ethics.

 

Question 16

What phenomenon in evolutionary ethics does Robert Trivers spend his time documenting?

 

Sex selection

 

Kin altruism

 

 

Reciprocal altruism

 

Incest taboos

 

Question 17

What phenomenon in sexual ethics is Donald Symons describing in this passage? “It seems likely that parents (and perhaps other elder kin) have systematically attempted to inculcate one set of sexual attitudes in their daughters and another in their sons, since copulation exposes males and females to very different risks.”

 

The sexual double standard

 

Male jealousy

 

 

The female attitude toward adultery

 

Incest taboos

 

Question 18

Who is the author of the following text? “”Since reason alone can never produce any action, or give rise to volition, I infer, that the same faculty is as incapable of preventing volition, or of disputing the preference with any passion or emotion. This consequence is necessary.”

 

 

Question 19

Who is the author of the following text? “The presumed objectivity of moral judgments thus being a chimera, there can be no moral truth in the sense in which this term is generally understood. The ultimate reason for this is, that the moral concepts are based upon emotions, and that the contents of an emotion fall entirely outside the category of truth.”

 

 

Question 20

Who offers us this story to illustrate a point about morality? “I will refer to a pupil of mine, who sought me out in the following circumstances. His father was quarreling with his mother and was also inclined to be a ‘collaborator’; his elder brother had been killed in the German offensive of 1940 and this young man, with a sentiment somewhat primitive but generous, burned to avenge him. His mother was living with him, deeply afflicted by the semi-treason of his father and by the death of her eldest son, and her one consolation was in this young man. But he, at this moment, had the choice between going to England to join the Free French Forces or of staying near his mother and helping her to live.”

 

 

What is the study about?

Classics in the History of Psychology
You will probably need to read the article more than once to truly understand it.You should pay attention to the main topic of the paper, what kinds of questions the authors ask, how the ideas in the paper are organized, and what the tables, charts, and graphs show.It is best to take notes while you are reading the paper.What to Include in Your Summary:
Your goal is to write a summary of the article that is so clear that a classmate could understand it. In other words, your summary should show that you have read the article carefully and understand the content of the article. Your paper should be a summary of the following:
The topic(s) of the study — What is the study about?The goal(s) of the study — What is the question or questions at the heart of the article? What questions are the authors trying to answer?Who were the participants (subjects) in the study? Where did they come from?What answers did the authors find to their questions? In other words, what were the results of the study?What is your evaluation of this study? Are the results of this study important in the real world? Would the results of this study change the way we do things in some area of psychology?You do not need to provide details about the data analysis or statistics.A Few Helpful Hints:
You should check your paper for grammar and spelling.You must describe the study in your own words, and you cannot quote directly from the text. Any report that is entirely or partly copied word-for-word from a research article will automatically be rated as a “fail” paper. That is plagiarism, and we do check for it. Please see the UHD Student Handbook for the complete policy statement on Academic Honesty (pg 45) at: https://www.uhd.edu/student-resources/handbook/Documents/20162017.pdfAs stated in the UHD Academic Integrity policy: Cheating includes, but is not limited to:
Submitting material that is not one’s own.Using information or devices that are not allowed by the faculty member.Obtaining and/or using unauthorized material.Fabricating information.Violating procedures prescribed to protect the integrity of a test, or other evaluation exercise.Collaborating with others on assignments without the faculty member’s consent.Cooperating with or helping another student to cheat.Having another person take an examination in the student’s place.Altering exam answers and requesting that the exam be re-graded.Communicating with any person during an exam, other than the faculty member or exam proctor.As stated in the UHD Academic Integrity policy: Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to:
Directly quoting the words of others without using quotation marks or indented format to identify them.Using sources of information (published or unpublished) without identifying them.Paraphrasing materials or ideas of others without identifying the sources.**To avoid accidental plagiarism, visit UHD’s web site on a “Short Guide to Avoiding Plagiarism.” You can find this at https://www.uhd.edu/library/guides/plagiarism.html
STEP 3 – Write the Article Summary

Case study 6 national collegiate athletic association ethics and

Case Study 2: National Collegiate Athletic Association Ethics and Compliance Program

Due Week 6 and worth 200 points

 

Read “Case Study 6: National Collegiate Athletic Association Ethics and Compliance Program,” located on page 444 of the textbook.

 

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

  1. Determine the fundamental ways in which the NCAA’s ethics program failed to prevent the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.
  2. Examine the principal ways in which the leadership of the NCAA contributed to the ethical violations of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.
  3. Predict the key differences in the scenarios that occurred at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas if an effective ethics program was in place. Provide a rationale for your response.
  4. Postulate on two (2) actions that the NCAA leadership should take in order to regain the trust and confidence of students and stakeholders.
  5. Recommend two (2) measures that the HR departments of colleges and universities should take to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future. Provide a rationale for your response.
  6. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Describe the business ethics issues and definitions, theories, and frameworks important to organizational ethical decision making and the role of a human resource professional.
  • Determine the role of stakeholder interests, the interrelationship of ethics and social responsibility, and the role of corporate governance in ethics.
  • Analyze scenarios to determine the ethical character of decisions made and the related impact on the organization.
  • Write clearly and concisely about issues in ethics and advocacy for HR professionals using correct grammar and mechanics.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in business ethics and advocacy for HR professionals.