Point out the faulty reasoning in each of the following situations

Eco 372 week 1 DQ

Briefly, point out the faulty reasoning in each of the following situations:

You win a free, nontransferable ticket to a Sheryl Crow concert. Since the ticket is free and it will therefore cost you nothing to go, you decide to go to the concert. What will be your response if only ticket is included? Please provide justification with correlation to economic concepts you have studied. How will your answer change if everything including gas, food and baby sitter charges are also paid?
You paid nonrefundable tuition of $3,000 to take a 15-week course. Therefore, the opportunity cost of attending class each week is $3,000 divided by 15, or $200.
You like to avoid costs; every decision involves opportunity cost. So you don’t make decisions.
You have purchased 5 premium apples for $1.99 a pound, but when you get home, you discover they are mushy. Since you paid top dollar for these apples, you decide you have to eat them.

Please read the following passage and answer the questions:

Peak-hour traffic jams have become so horrific, some governments are beginning to look at a market solution to the problem. This is what economists call a tragedy-of-the-commons problem.

In Southern California, drivers are being charged premiums to travel in underused car pool lanes.

Singapore, Norway, and France are managing traffic with various tolls.

Peak surcharges are being studied for roads and bridges around New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and other cities.

Congestion pricing, as this traffic-control strategy is called, isn’t that radical. Peak prices are used to ration such things as Super Bowl tickets, opening night at the opera or a rock concert, airline tickets at Thanksgiving, and hotel rooms in Cancun. Why not roads?

Tollbooths would be required – millions of them. Besides their costs, they would slow up traffic even more.

In every public poll taken, responders hate the idea. “Lexus lanes” would accommodate the well-heeled while Joe Sixpack couldn’t afford it. The biggest fans of congestion pricing concede it could worsen inequality and “destroy what Joan Didion called America’s only community – the free road may be the last thing that rich and poor share equally.”

Varying tolls may not reduce congestion. Maine Turnpike officials found that knocking off as much as $1.60 off the Saturday morning tolls didn’t clear the Friday night backup.

But there is another side to the story.

With new technology, road authorities can now hand out credit-card-size transponders that could be mounted on dashboards, and pay tolls to overhead computers as they whiz by. No delays for toll booths.

A ten-mile stretch of privately-owned highway in Orange County, California, has been a great success. Studies have shown that by removing themselves from the freeway, the tollpayers are making the non-tollpayers’ commutes faster too.

Who knows? This may be one of those invisible-hand deals that benefits all – faster commutes all round, cleaner air, financial reward for road investors, and savings for taxpayers.

Sources: Kim Clark, “How to Make Traffic Jams a Thing of the Past,” Fortune, March 31, 1997, p. 34, and “The Road Less Traveled Is Private and Expensive,” Los Angeles Times, August 16, 2002.

Questions:

1. Is the problem here one of supply, or demand, or both?

2. Is this a shift-factor problem or a quantity-supplied or quantity-demanded problem?

3. Do you agree that market-based pricing equilibrium would make everyone happy?

4. How would you graph this?

5. Does the article imply a consumer surplus or a producer surplus without tolls?

Some have claimed that due to the deep recession of 2008 – 2009, Keynesian economics is making a comeback. Do you think this true? Why do you think this is?


 

. WITH BEST NURSING TUTORS .

get-your-custom-paper

The post Point out the faulty reasoning in each of the following situations appeared first on BEST NURSING TUTORS .

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Point out the faulty reasoning in each of the following situations appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

Juvenile Justice Viewpoints

: History of Juvenile Justice Provide a brief review (no more than 8 sentences) in your own words of how society’s views of juveniles have evolved to today’s treatment of juveniles in our current juvenile justice system structure. Be sure to review how juvenile offenders are treated currently versus how they were treated in the past. Note: This paragraph will require you to summarize and paraphrase what you learned in the Module 2 textbook readings about the history of juvenile justice. 3. Paragraph 2: Differences and Examples In your own words, explain the difference between a juvenile delinquent, a status offender, and an adult criminal offender. Provide examples of the types of offenses each category would engage in. Briefly describe in your own words how each of the youth categories (juvenile delinquent and status offender) are treated in the juvenile justice system, based on the Chapter 1 readings. 4. Paragraph 3: Correlates of Delinquency Consider the correlates of delinquency discussed in the Module 2 readings. Identify and summarize two correlates of delinquency that are relevant to the “Viewpoint” reading. For each correlate that you identify, provide specific facts and evidence from the “Viewpoint” reading to support your discussion. 5. Paragraph 4: Chronic Offenders In your own words, define the concept of the chronic offender. Consider the reading(s) on chronic offenders. Identify and discuss at least two causes of chronic offending that are discuss​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ed in the module readings and demonstrated in the “Viewpoint” reading. For each cause that you identify, provide specific facts and evidence from the “Viewpoint” reading to support your discussion. 6. Paragraphs 5-6: Policy Implications Consider the discussion of policy implications related to chronic offending issues in Chapters 1 and 2 of the textbook. Identify, research (using reliable, external (not your textbook) resources), and discuss one specific policy related to chronic offenders that could be useful in the case described in the Chapter 2 “Viewpoint” reading. Describe the policy, giving enough detail that your reader(s) understand the fundamental elements. Be sure to include how it is supposed to address issues related to chronic offending. Discuss how this policy would have been useful in the Chapter 2 “Viewpoint” case, providing facts and evidence from the case and textbook readings to support your discussion. . 7. Paragraph 7: Juvenile Waivers Consider the Chapter 2 “Viewpoint” reading and the module readings and resources. Address the following: Using evidence from the case study and the textbook readings, discuss whether Shatiek should remain in the juvenile justice system or be waived to adult court.

Sample Solution

The post Juvenile Justice Viewpoints appeared first on homework handlers.

Performance Appraisals and Performance History

Companies seek to promote employees that display the proper knowledge and abilities to function at a higher level. In many cases, the performance appraisal is a major factor in determining candidate’s performance history and eligibility for promotion. In at least 200 words, explain how past performance is a predictor of future performance and how an electronic database of performance appraisals improves opportunities for successful promotion.

Sample Solution

The post Performance Appraisals and Performance History appeared first on homework handlers.

Enterprise Resource Management (ERP)

How did Enterprise Resource Management (ERP) help improve business operations at Shell?

Sample Solution

The post Enterprise Resource Management (ERP) appeared first on homework handlers.