Social, economic, and political philosophies

/in /by

  

Using the primary texts: 

Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom – 1786

Brutus I – Brutus 1787

Federalists I-Publius Alexander Hamilton 1787

Speech on Amendments to the Constitution

Property-James Madison 1792

Farewell Address-George Washington 1796

1: Your paper must be formatted having an Introduction, body of paragraphs, and conclusion, with a bibliography page with your sources at the end of your paper. The font should be Times New Roman, 12 size font, double spaced, and each paragraph should be indented for the first sentence on the left side.  This paper is 500-1000 words. For example, use the papers I have had on Blackboard in the content section as a guide. DO NOT REFER TO YOURSELF IN THIS PAPER LIKE “I THINK…” AND DO NOT USE CONTRACTIONS LIKE, “DON’T; WON’T; AIN’T!” YOU WILL BE DOCKED POINTS!

           *Paragraph 1: Introduction must have the thesis in the first paragraph. Tell me what you are writing your paper about.  Discuss the similarities and differences between the social, economic, and political philosophies of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists versus Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans (Anti-Federalists).

           *Paragraph 2: 1st Body Paragraph:  Discuss the similarities and differences between the social, economic, and political philosophies of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists versus Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans (Anti-Federalists) :   Why did these political factions emerge? How did each view the other? 

           * Paragraph 3: 2nd  Body Paragraph: Discuss the similarities and differences between the social, economic, and political philosophies of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists versus Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans (Anti-Federalists) :  From what segments of society did each faction draw its support? How did each faction view slavery? 

           * Paragraph 4: 3rd  Body Paragraph: Discuss the similarities and differences between the social, economic, and political philosophies of Alexander Hamilton and the Federalists versus Thomas Jefferson and the Republicans (Anti-Federalists) :   Was this the precursor to the debate over slavery in the Antebellum period?  

           * Paragraph 5: Conclusion: Close out your paper by writing and summarizing your finding’s.

2: Write out an outline to help you organize your paper. I will look over them by your request.

3: Write your paper on a Microsoft Word Document and make sure you have read your own work several times and edited it before you submit your paper. 

You will need to explain the historical context in which these texts were written, based on what you have read in the text and learned in class discussion and how they relate and help answer the prompt. No secondary sources, other than the provided text should be integrated into this paper’s analysis. 

Goals of this paper: The purpose of this assignment is to advance your ability to reason through a specific historical question and to communicate through written text your ideas. Your paper should critically consider the issue and or problem and deliver all relevant information. You should also provide a clear thesis statement. 

In a paper, this size, your introduction, and the thesis should appear in the first paragraph. Make sure to paraphrase your sources accurately. In other words, state what the source says, not what you wished it said or thought it said. You need to state the evidence fairly, even if you think it wrong or offensive. Your paper should use evidence to answer the historical question. Your paper should develop and organize your thoughts clearly and logically. Outlining is necessary, but not required, step in writing a well-organized paper. Your paper should draw a conclusion that addresses the paper’s chief topic or question and that states your answer to the question or your contribution to the topic.

Formatting:

Your paper needs to be typed, double spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman font. You will need to cite your sources using the Chicago Manual of Style. Here is a link to an online resource for those unfamiliar with this style:

https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org

You will need to use footnotes for in-text citations and your paper needs to have a works cited page with the sources you used in your paper.essay

Consider the health care issues and deficits you have recognized in your professional practice.

/in /by

Discussion: State Practice Agreements
Consider the following:
During NP clinical practicum experiences, we identify, as nurses, many health care issues that need to be addressed at the local, state, or national level. Addressing the need for change in health care policy is now an intricate part of your role as a social change agent.
For this Discussion, you will identify a change needed in your community and what your nursing legacy for positive social change will be.
To prepare:

Consider the health care issues and deficits you have recognized in your professional practice.
Identify a change needed in your community in health care policy and discuss how you could impart change during your career as an NP.
Consider your future as a NP and what your nursing legacy will be. How will you impart Social Change?

 
Post at least 250 words (no conclusion or introduction)

short paper employment law

/in /by

This short paper will help you synthesize information from the readings for this module and inform your thinking when you work on Section IX of the final project.

In the transcripts provided for the final project case study, many legal risks occur through the actions of the characters. Based on the readings for this module, what laws are applicable in this situation and how are they applicable? Support your response with specific examples. Additionally, who should be accountable for the potential legal failures in this scenario? How can the supervisor and call center manager create a culture of accountability?

Your paper should include these critical elements:

  • Identification of applicable laws with supporting examples
  • Identification of accountable audience (individuals/parties)
  • Recommendation of strategies the call center can use to create cultural accountability

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper should be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.

Article: Summary of Major Laws of the Department of Labor “The Department of Labor (DOL) administers and enforces more than 180 federal laws.” This article provides a brief description of many of DOL’s principal statutes most commonly applicable to businesses, job seekers, workers, retirees, contractors, and grantees.

Library Article: Challenge of Contract Provisions a No-Go for Nova Scotia Engineer This article chronicles the story about a fired employee’s claim that his employment contract was void because of a non-compliant severance provision and an inaccurate job description.

Library Article: The Rise of the Workplace Ombudsman “One of the mechanisms for internal conflict resolution has been an ombudsman. This is a person (or office) that oversees or assists with the investigation and resolution of workplace complaints.” This article discusses how the rise of the workforce ombudsman came to prominence.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post short paper employment law appeared first on Essay Writers.

pinson book crituqe 1

/in /by

A book critique is a summary/evaluation of a book. The Pinson Book Critique must be 5–7 pages, double-spaced. This is a formal paper. Write in third person and follow current Turabian guidelines. The Pinson Book Critique must include a biographical entry, author information, content summary, and an evaluation.

  • Documentation

When you refer to any of the author’s points in either the Content Summary or Evaluation, paraphrase and do not quote. Then document by putting the page number of the comment to which you are referring (e.g., p. 70).

B. Bibliographical Entry

Pinson, J. Matthew. Perspectives on Christian Worship: Five Views. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2009. ISBN: 9780805440997.

C. Author Information

The purpose of this section is to identify the author (translator or editor) of the book. If available, present the author’s background, academic training, and practical experience. You can help a reader understand a book by describing the author.

D. Content Summary

This section must be no more than 2 pages. The first sentence must be as comprehensive and inclusive as possible; in other words, summarize the book in 1 sentence. The remainder of the summary is then an elaboration of this sentence, sharing your understanding of what the book is.

E. Summary

Be sure the summary covers the entire book. Do not be so detailed about the first part of the book that you do not adequately address the subsequent sections. To avoid this problem, organize the summary carefully and logically. Also, do not get bogged down in specifics. The task is to summarize the entire book, not to focus on selected details.

F. Evaluation

The evaluation is the most crucial part of the critique. This is not a summary of the book’s content, but instead it is a critical appraisal of what the author has to say. React to the book both positively and negatively. Because books, like people, are different, one cannot impose predetermined critical questions on the book.

You have already stated in your Content Summary the author’s major theme or thesis and purpose for writing the book. The following questions are guidelines to help you develop the evaluation section:

  • Does the author achieve his intended purpose?
  • Is the main theme convincing?
  • What presuppositions (i.e., with what ideas does he approach the subject) or basic assumptions does the author reveal in the work? Are they legitimate and valid?
  • Are his arguments logical, well supported, or convincing?
  • What evidence does the author provide to sustain his main theme?
  • What are his conclusions?
  • What is unique, significant, or interesting about the book?
  • Does it contain unusual historical, theological, or literary traits?
  • What biases (theological, philosophical, denominational, etc.) are evident?
  • What does the book/author teach us?
  • What is good about the book?
  • What is bad about the book?
  • Who should read the book?
  • How can a person implement these concepts in ministry (teaching, etc.)?
  • How does this book contribute to your understanding of the subject covered?

Avoid generalities such as, “Every person (minister, teacher, etc.) should read this book” or, “this is a (good, bad) book.” Do not assume anything. Write as though the reader knows nothing about the author, the author’s point of view, or the book’s contents.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post pinson book crituqe 1 appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.